Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Abraham Parayil Mathew Varghese vs Union Bank Of India
2022 Latest Caselaw 4864 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4864 Ker
Judgement Date : 29 April, 2022

Kerala High Court
Abraham Parayil Mathew Varghese vs Union Bank Of India on 29 April, 2022
        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                           PRESENT
      THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
 FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL 2022 / 9TH VAISAKHA, 1944
                WP(C) NO. 14519 OF 2022
PETITIONER:

         ABRAHAM PARAYIL MATHEW VARGHESE
         AGED 48 YEARS
         S/O.MATHEW VARGHESE,
         PARAYIL HOUSE,
         ECTTICHUVADU P.O., RANNI,
         PATHANAMTHITTA -689 675.
         BY ADV E.V.MOLY


RESPONDENT :

         UNION BANK OF INDIA
         REGIONAL OFFICE,
         KOTTAYAM, 3RD FLOOR,
         AMALA TOWERS,
         ADICHIRA JUNCTION,
         KOTTAYM-686 630.
         REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER.

         ADV.A.S.P.KURUP, SC



THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 29.04.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO.14519 of 2022
                                                2



                        MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
                        .......................................
                         W.P.(C) No.14519 of 2022
                    ................................................
                   Dated this the 29 th day of April, 2022

                                         JUDGMENT

The petitioner has availed a loan to the tune of

Rs.37 lakhs from the respondent bank by creating

security interest upon immovable property consisting of

4.39 Ares of land. Due to Covid-19 pandemic

repayments were not made in time and the same led

to proceedings for recovery against the petitioner.

Ext.P1 is the possession notices issued under Sections

13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of

Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest

Act, 2002.

2. The limited prayer of the petitioner in this writ

petition is to grant instalment facility to pay the

overdue amounts and to regularise the loan account.

3. I have heard Smt.Moly.E.V., the learned counsel for

the petitioner as well as Sri.A.S.P.Kurup, the learned WP(C) NO.14519 of 2022

Standing Counsel for the respondent.

4. The learned Standing Counsel, upon instructions,

submitted that the total overdue amount is

Rs.9,35,000/- and the respondent Bank is willing to

accept repayment of the overdue amount in limited

instalments and to regularise the loan account.

5. Taking into account the averments in the writ petition

and after hearing the learned counsel on either side, I

deem it appropriate to grant '10' equal monthly

instalments to the petitioners to wipe off the overdue

amounts due to the respondent bank.

6. In the said circumstances, this writ petition is disposed

of, with a direction to the respondent-Bank to accept

repayment of the entire overdue amount of

Rs.9,35,000/- along with bank charges and to

regularise the loan account of the petitioners on the

following conditions:

(i). The overdue amount of Rs.9,35,000/- along with

bank charges shall be repaid in '10' equated monthly

instalments, on condition that the 1 st instalment shall WP(C) NO.14519 of 2022

be paid within two weeks and the remaining

instalments shall be paid on or before the 25 th day of

every succeeding month.

(ii). Petitioner shall continue to pay the regular EMI's

with the accrued interest, if any, continuously over

and above the instalments to pay off the overdue

amounts.

(iii). In the event of two defaults at any point of time

in repaying the instalments, the petitioners will lose

the benefit of this judgment and the respondent bank

will be at liberty to proceed against the petitioners on

the basis of the recovery proceedings already initiated.

(iv) In order to enable the petitioners to repay the

entire amounts, all coercive proceedings initiated

against the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., JUDGE

AMV/29/04/2022 WP(C) NO.14519 of 2022

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 14519/2022

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION NOTICE DATED 22.02.2022 RECEIVED BY THE PETITIONER Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE SALE NOTICE DATED 19.03.2022 RECEIVED BY THE PETITIONER

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS : NIL

TRUE COPY

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter