Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 20309 Ker
Judgement Date : 30 September, 2021
MJC No.533/2011 1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANIL KUMAR
Thursday, the 30th day of September 2021 / 8th Aswina, 1943
MJC NO. 533 OF 2011 IN RSA.NO.604/2004
O.S.No.4/1994 OF THE SUB COURT, KOTTARAKKARA.
RFA.No.133/2003 OF THE DISTRICT COURT, KOLLAM.
APPLICANTS/APPELLANTS:
1.V.RAMAKRISHNAN,S/O.VELAYUDHAN,AGED 65 YEARS, RETD.GOVT SERVANT,LAL
BHAVAN,MULLIKKAD, CHIRAVOOR MURI,CHITHARA VILLAGE,KOLLAM.
2.OMANA,W/O.V.RAMAKRISHNAN,LAL BHAVAN,MULLIKKAD,CHIRAVOOR
MURI,CHITHARA VILLAGE,KOLLAM.
3.MANGLAL V.R.,S/O.OMANA, KRISHNA, MULLIKKAD,CHIRAVOOR MURI,CHITHARA
VILLAGE,KOLLAM.
4.ANILAL V.R.,S/O.OMANA, UTHRADAM, MULLIKKAD,CHIRAVOOR MURI,CHITHARA
VILLAGE,KOLLAM.
5.AJITHLAL V.R.,S/O.OMANA, LAL BHAVAN, MULLIKKAD,CHIRAVOOR
MURI,CHITHARA VILLAGE,KOLLAM.
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT:
1.SAINA,D/O.LEELA,KARIKKATHIL VEEDU,MULAYARAKONAM MURI,NILAMEL
VILLAGE.
2.R.SHEEJA,D/O.LATE RAMAKRISHNAN,KUZHIVILA VEEDU,KARIYARA
MURI,CHITHARA VILLAGE,KOLLAM.
3.R.SABIN, S/O.LATE RAMAKRISHNAN,KUZHIVILA VEEDU,KARIYARA
MURI,CHITHARA VILLAGE,KOLLAM.
4.R.STAILY,S/O.LATE RAMAKRISHNAN,KUZHIVILA VEEDU,KARIYARA
MURI,CHITHARA VILLAGE,KOLLAM.
5.LEELA,W/O.LATE RAMAKRISHNAN,KUZHIVILA VEEDU,KARIYARA MURI,CHITHARA
VILLAGE,KOLLAM.
6.BABU RAJAN,S/O.KUNJU RAMAN,KARIKKATHIL VEEDU,MULAYARAKONAM
MURI,NILAMEL VILLAGE, KOLLAM.
7.SUGATHAN,S/O.SADASIVAN,NEDUMPACHA PUTHEN VEEDU,KARIYARA
MURI,KARIYARA VILLAGE.
8.MADHUSOODANAN,S/O.CHELLAPPAN,NEDUMPACHA PUTHEN VEEDU,KARIYARA
MURI,KARIYARA VILLAGE.
9.MINIMOL,D/O.PRABHA,K.M.P.HOUSE,KALLUVETTAMKUZHY, CHITHARA MURI,
CHITHARA VILLAGE.
10.PRABHA,D/O.BHARATHY,NEDUMPACHA PUTHEN VEEDU,KARIYARA
MURI,CHITHARA VILLAGE, KOLLAM.
MJC No.533/2011 2/2
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case praying that in the circumstances
stated in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court be pleased to
restore the above case into file, in the interest of justice.
This MJC coming on for orders upon perusing the MJC and the
affidavit filed in support thereof and this Court's judgment dated
25-10-2011 in RSA-604/2004 and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. M.K.
Chandramohan Das, Advocate for Petitioners &
Sri.K.P.Satheesan, Sri.K.K.Gopinathan Nair, Sri.M.R.Jayaprasad
and Sri.K.K.Rajeev, Advocates for respondents 1,2 and 4 to 6 and Sri.
V.E.Abdul Gafoor and Sri. Mohammed Savad, Advocates for the 9th
respondent, the Court passed the following:
ORDER
No representation for the petitioners. Service not complete in MJC. No fresh steps seen taken. Petitioners called absent. MJC dismissed for default.
Sd/- N.ANIL KUMAR JUDGE
30-09-2021 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!