Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 19757 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 September, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021/1ST ASWINA, 1943
W.P.(C) NO.17271 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
ABDULLAH C.P., AGED 70 YEARS,
S/O. MAMMADKUTTY HAJI, AYSHA MANZIL,
VELIMUKKU SOUTH P.O, TIRURANGADI TALUK,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL
RESPONDENTS:
1 UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY,
MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAY,
NEW DELHI, PIN - 110 001.
2 THE SECRETARY,
MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAY,
NEW DELHI - PIN - 110 001.
3 THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA,
G. 5 & 6, SECTOR 10, DWARAKA, NEW DELHI,
PIN - 110 075, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR.
4 THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY,
LAND ACQUISITION (NH 66), MALAPPURAM P.O,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676 505.
5 THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR,
LAND ACQUISITION (NH 17), UNIT - 1,
VALAKULAM P.O, TIRUR TALUK,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676 508.
BY ADVS.
SRI.K.P.SATHEESAN (SR.)
SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM)
SRI.SABU PULLAN
SRI.GOKUL D. SUDHAKARAN
SMT.AMMINIKUTTY, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER
SRI.K.SUDHINKUMAR - SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 23.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No.17271 of 2021
2
JUDGMENT
The petitioner claims to be the
owner of 11.02 Ares of land, comprised
of in Re-survey No.381/11-2 (old Survey
No.449/8) of Moonniyoor Village of
Tirurangadi Taluk, and says that the
entire extent has been now acquired by
the 3rd respondent-National Highway
Authority of India (NHAI), for
development of a Highway.
2. The petitioner asserts that no
Award has been issued in his favour by
the Competent Authority for Land
Acquisition(CALA), under the provisions
of the National Highways Act (NH Act for
short) and that said Authority is
refusing to do so, asking him to produce W.P.(C) No.17271 of 2021
the copies of the Purchase Certificate
obtained by him with respect to the
property.
3. The petitioner asserts that the
afore requirement made against him,
through Ext.P2, is untenable because,
even though he has been in possession of
the property under a 'kanam' right even
prior to 01/01/1970, he had not applied
for and obtained a Purchase Certificate
in his name. He says that, therefore,
the condition in Ext.P2 is impossible;
and consequently prays that the CALA be
directed to grant him the eligible
compensation, without insisting on
production of a Purchase Certificate or
the application made by him for such
purpose.
4. The learned Senior Government W.P.(C) No.17271 of 2021
Pleader, Smt.K.Amminikutty, opposed the
afore claim of the petitioner, saying
that the CALA has only acted as per law,
because compensation cannot be disbursed
to the petitioner, unless his title over
the property is established. She then
submitted that, admittedly the
petitioner only has a 'kanam' right over
the property; and therefore, that unless
he is able to demonstrate his ownership
and title over it, further action
pursuant to Ext.P1 notice, issued under
the provisions of Section 3E(1) of the
'NH Act' cannot be taken forward. She
thus prayed that petitioner be directed
to produce documents to establish his
title over the property in question for
continuation of the proceedings by the
CALA, thus culminating in an appropriate W.P.(C) No.17271 of 2021
Award and disbursement of compensation.
5. Sri.Sudhin Kumar, learned
Standing Counsel for the 'NHAI', adopted
the afore submissions of
Smt.K.Amminikutty, adding that even
though the amounts have been made
available by the Authority concerned for
disbursal, it cannot be done unless the
petitioner establishes his exclusive
title over the property in terms of law.
He explained that it is, therefore, that
the CALA has directed the petitioner to
produce either his Purchase Certificate
or at least his application to show the
same having been applied.
6. I must say that I cannot find the
requirement in Ext.P2, asking the
petitioner to produce his Purchase
Certificate or the application made by W.P.(C) No.17271 of 2021
him for such purpose, to be unfair or
illegal, because, as rightly stated by
the learned Senior Government Pleader,
unless the petitioner is able to
establish his title over the property in
question, an Award cannot be issued in
his favour, nor can the eligible
compensation disbursed.
7. In other words, it is for the
petitioner to prove his title over the
required property and since he says that
he has not applied for a Purchase
Certificate yet, I am of the view that
he should be given an opportunity of
establishing the same through other
methods, as is validly known to law.
8. In the afore circumstances, I
direct the petitioner to mark appearance
before the CALA at 11.00 am on W.P.(C) No.17271 of 2021
11/10/2021, on which day, he may produce
all relevant documents in his possession
to establish his title over the property
in question, which shall then be
assessed by the said Authority, taking
note of the petitioner's contention that
he had not applied for a Purchase
Certificate with respect to the property
in question; thus culminating in an
appropriate Award, as expeditiously as
is possible, but not later than one
month thereafter.
The Writ Petition is thus ordered.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN ss JUDGE W.P.(C) No.17271 of 2021
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 17271/2021
PETITIONER EXHIBITS:
Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 23.02.2021.
Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 4.08.2021
Exhibit P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED 03.06.2021.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!