Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The President vs State Of Kerala
2021 Latest Caselaw 19536 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 19536 Ker
Judgement Date : 17 September, 2021

Kerala High Court
The President vs State Of Kerala on 17 September, 2021
WP(C) NO. 19369 OF 2021                 1

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                   PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
     FRIDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 26TH BHADRA, 1943
                          WP(C) NO. 19369 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
          THE PRESIDENT,
          ST. THOMAS EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST, ST.
          THOMAS CHURCH, MALAYATTOOR, FUNCTIONING AS THE
          MANAGER, ST. THOMAS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,
          MALAYATTOOR, ERNAKULAM-683 587.

             BY ADVS.
             N.SATHEESH
             K.JANARDHANA SHENOY
             MARTIN CHACKO
             S.RAKHEE
             PRIYA CAROL


RESPONDENTS:

      1      STATE OF KERALA,
             REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL
             EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

      2      THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION,
             DIRECTORATE OF GENERAL EDUCATION, JAGATHY,
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014.

      3      THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR,
             HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, ERNAKULAM, EDAPPALLY-682
             024.

      4      THE DIRECTOR,
             DIRECTORATE OF MINORITY WELFARE, GOVERNMENT OF
             KERALA,
             4TH FLOOR, VIKAS BHAVAN,
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033.
             SRI BIJOY CHANDRAN SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER


       THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON    17.09.2021,   THE    COURT   ON   THE   SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 19369 OF 2021                   2

                                   JUDGMENT

St. Thomas Higher Secondary School is a school run by the

St.Thomas Educational and Charitable Trust. The petitioner herein is the

President of the Trust and the Manager of the school. The institution is

owned by the Roman Catholic School Minority Community and is under

the management of the Roman Catholic St. Thomas Church, Malayatoor.

The petitioner asserts that the school is an educational institution

established and administered by the Christian Religious community and

hence, entitled to protection under Article 30(1) of the Constitution of

India.

2. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition concerns

the non-issuance of the minority certificate, the production of which is a

condition precedent to make admissions to the seats earmarked as

community quota in the school.

3. The petitioner states that on 22.11.2019, the petitioner had

submitted Ext.P4 application before the 1st respondent seeking issuance

of minority status certificate. The said request was responded with Ext.P5

communication wherein it is stated that the Government has appointed

the 4th respondent as the competent authority under Section 10 of the

National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions (NCMEI) Act,

2004 to decide on the application regarding issuance of No Objection

Certificate for the establishment of educational institutions by minorities.

It is also stated that the Secretary General, Education Department is the

competent authority under Section 12(B) of NCMEI Act to decide on the

application regarding minority status of educational institutions.

4. In the light of Ext.P5, the petitioner is stated to have filed an

application for issuance of NOC. Since no action was taken, the petitioner

approached this Court and filed W.P.(C) No.16792/2020 seeking

directions. By Ext.P6 judgment dated 19.8.2020, the petitioner herein

was permitted to admit students to the 20% community quota in the

higher secondary school for the academic year 2020-2021 and directions

were issued to open the web portal to facilitate the admission process.

Further direction was issued to the 4th respondent to consider Ext.P4

application submitted by the petitioner and take a decision within three

months. The petitioner contends that the 4th respondent considered the

request made by the petitioner and issued Ext.P7 No objection certificate

in granting minority status to the St. Thomas Higher Secondary School.

Armed with Ext.P7, the petitioner is stated to have approached the 1st

respondent and filed Ext.P8 application seeking issuance of minority

certificate. It is contended that the 1st respondent has not taken any

action to date. The explanation offered is that the 1st respondent has not

established the administrative mechanism to process the applications.

5. The petitioner contends that the admission procedure for the

academic year 2021-2022 has commenced and the submission of online

applications to community quota seats will start on 20.9.2021. In

response to the application submitted by the petitioner, Ext.P9 verification

report has been issued wherein it is stated that the admission to

community quota seats will be based on the submission of the minority

certificate. According to the petitioner, unless the certificate sought for

by the petitioner is submitted, they will not be permitted to make

admissions to the community quota. It is contended that the petitioner

has been enjoying the minority status and they have been admitting

students in the minority quota from the very inception of the school. They

are also stated to have remitted fees in the Government treasury for

admitting the students to the minority quota as is evident from Ext.P10.

It is owing to the delay on the part of the respondents in expeditiously

considering the application submitted by the petitioner that this stalemate

has occurred. It is in the afore circumstances that the petitioner is before

this Court seeking directions to the respondents 1 and 2 to permit the

petitioner to make admission to 20% seats in the Higher Secondary

Section of St.Thomas Higher Secondary school for the seats earmarked

towards community quota and for further directions.

6. I have heard Shri. N. Satheesh, the learned counsel for the

petitioner and Smt. Nisha Bose, the learned Senior Government Pleader

appearing for the respondents.

7. The records reveal that the petitioner has been enjoying

minority status from the year 2000 onwards and till last year they were

being permitted to make admissions in the minority quota, as per the

Rules. This aspect of the matter has been considered by this Court while

passing Ext.P6 judgment. It also appears that when the condition for the

production of minority status certificate was imposed, the petitioner had

approached this Court and had filed W.P.(C) No.14871 of 2019 and during

the pendency of the writ petition, the respondents had permitted the

petitioner to make admissions under the community quota. Even during

the last academic year, taking note of the filing of the application by the

petitioner before the competent authority, this Court had directed the

respondents to admit the students to the community quota for the

academic year 2020-2021. I find that the competent authority has

considered the application and has issued a no-objection certificate in

favour of the petitioner herein. However, the records reveal that the

petitioner approached the 1st respondent seeking issuance of the minority

certificate only on 18.8.2021. Of course, the petitioner has a contention

that in view of the restrictions imposed in the State due to the Pandemic

they were not in a position to approach earlier. They also contend that

the respondents have been delaying the acceptance of the application by

stating that they have not been able to establish a mechanism to process

the application. Be that as it may, I find that this Court had by exhibit P6

judgment issued directions to the respondents to permit the petitioner to

admit students in the minority quota for the academic year 2020-2021.

The petitioner is in a better position now that the 4th respondent has

issued Exhibit P7 NOC.

8. Now that the admission procedure for the academic year

2021-2022 is slated to commence on 20.9.2021 and as the respondents

have not taken a decision on Ext.P8 application filed by the petitioner, in

view of Ext.P9, the petitioner would not be able to make admission to the

seats earmarked towards community quota. It is by now settled that a

school which is otherwise a minority school would continue to be so

whether the Government declared it as such or not and the declaration by

the Government is at best only a recognition of an existing fact that it is

being administered by a minority community. (See N. Ammad v.

Manager, Emjay High School and Ors [(1998) 6 SCC 674]). It is

equally settled that Minority Educational Institutions has the right to

preserve certain percentage of seats for their community candidates and

are entitled to give them preference in admission to maintain the minority

character of the institution (See St. Stephen's College v. University of

Delhi [AIR 1992 SC1630]).

9. Having considered the entire facts, I am of the view that in

view of Ext.P7 and the pendency of Ext.P8 application, necessary

directions can be issued to the respondents to permit the petitioner to

make admissions to the seats earmarked towards community quota as

per the prospectus for admissions to the Higher Secondary Section of St.

Thomas Higher Secondary School. There will be a direction to the

petitioner to file an affidavit before the 1st respondent undertaking that

they shall produce the Minority Status Certificate before the end of the

academic year. The 1st respondent shall process Ext.P8 application in

the light of Ext.P7 and take a decision within a period of three months

from the date of production of a copy of this judgment.

This writ petition is disposed of with the above observations.

Sd/-

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V JUDGE sru

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 19369/2021

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. K. DIS.

26427/69/G4 DATED 30.07.1969 APPROVING THE CONSTITUTION OF THE CORPORATE EDUCATIONAL AGENCY ST. THOMAS CHURCH, MALAYATTOOR.

Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER G.O.

(MS) NO. 179/2000/G.EDN. DATED 02.06.2000.

Exhibit P3            A TRUE COPY OF THE TRUST DEED NO.
                      3/IV/2018 DATED 16.01.2018.

Exhibit P4            A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED
                      22.11.2019 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER
                      BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P5            A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO GEDN-
                      F3/10/2020-G.EDN. DATED 3.2.2020 FROM THE
                      IST RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P6            A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HONBLE
                      COURT DATED 19.08.2020 IN WPC NO.
                      16792/2020.

Exhibit P7            A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.
                      233/MSC/2020/MWD DATED 23.12.2020 OF THE
                      4TH RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P8            A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED
                      18.08.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER
                      BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P9            A TRUE COPY OF THE VERIFICATION REPORT
                      DATED 08.09.2021.

Exhibit P10           A TRUE COPY OF THE TREASURY TRANSATION
                      DETAILS DATED 09.08.2021 OF THE PETITIONER
                      SCHOOL FOR THE YEAR 2021-22.
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter