Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Salahudeen Alias Attukaran Salam vs State Of Kerala
2021 Latest Caselaw 19206 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 19206 Ker
Judgement Date : 14 September, 2021

Kerala High Court
Salahudeen Alias Attukaran Salam vs State Of Kerala on 14 September, 2021
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                  PRESENT
               THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.R.ANITHA
     TUESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 23RD BHADRA, 1943
                          CRL.MC NO. 1677 OF 2021
   (FOR QUASHIN THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.22/1998 OF VATTAPPARA
POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT AS AGAINST THE PETITIOENR
AND FOR CLOSING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINS IN S.C.NO.55/2018 ON THE FILE
              OF ASSISTANT SESSIONS COURT, NEDUMANGAD)
PETITIONER/3RD ACCUSED:

           SALAHUDEEN ALIAS ATTUKARAN SALAM
           AGED 53 YEARS
           S/O ABOOBAKER KUNJU,
           NAZIYA MANZIL,
           KOPPAM,
           MANNIKKAL, VEMBAYAM P.O.
           THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 615.

           BY ADV A.S.SHAMMY RAJ


RESPONDENTS/STATE AND INJURED PERSONS:

     1     STATE OF KERALA,
           REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
           HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
           HIGH COURT P.O.
           ERNAKULAM-682 031.

     2     SHAJAHAN
           AGED 50 YEARS
           S/O ABDUL LATHEEF,
           CHANTHAVILA VEEDU,
           KANYAKULANGARA,
           THEKKADA, VEMBAYAM P.O.
           THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 615.
 Crl.M.C.No.1677 OF 2021

                                 2




     3      RASEENA BEEVI
            AGED 42 YEARS
            W/O SHAJAHAN,
            CHANTHAVILA VEEDU,
            KANYAKULANGARA,
            THEKKADA, VEMBAYAM P.O.
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 615.

            BY ADV K.S.PRAVEEN


            ADV.C.SEENA - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR



      THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
14.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 Crl.M.C.No.1677 OF 2021

                                       3




                                 ORDER

Dated this the 14th day of September 2021

The petitioner is the 3rd accused in Crime No.22/1998 of

Vattapara Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram District, registered

under Sections 143, 144, 147, 148, 149, 458, 324, 120(b), 114, 307,

395 of Indian Penal Code r/w Section 27 of the Arms Act, and the

accused in S.C. No.55/2018 of Assistant Sessions Court,

Nedumangad.

2. This Crl.M.C. has been filed seeking to quash final report

as Annexure-A1 in Crime No.22/1998 Vattappara Police Station,

Thiruvananthapuram District, and all further proceedings in S.C.

No.55/2018 on the file of Assistant Sessions Court, Nedumangad, as

against the petitioner.

3. Annexure-A1 is the certified copy of the final report. It is

alleged by the prosecution that on 04.2.1998 at about 11.30 p.m, the

accused 1 to 9 trespassed into the residence of the defacto

complainant and accused persons kicked opened the door of the

southern room of the said house and the 1st accused shouted that Crl.M.C.No.1677 OF 2021

"how dare you filed a case against us before police, so we will kill

you" and took a sword and made a chop injury on the left wrist, and

by that time the 2nd accused made a chop injury on the left elbow of

the defacto complainant using a knief. 3rd accused made a chop injury

on the right palm and fingers using a knife, and when the defacto

complainant fell down, the accused 4 and 6 made chop injury on both

legs of defacto complainant and the 5 th accused made a cut injury on

the left foot, and 7th accused made a cut injury on the right knee, and

the 8th accused made a cut injury on the right toe of the defacto

complainant. Thereby, they committed the offence aforementioned.

4. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the

case against accused Nos.5 and 8 has also ended in acquittal as per

the judgment in S.C. No. 2493/2006, dated 18.12.2017 of the

Assistant Sessions Judge, Nedumangad. He produced the copy of the

judgment as Annexure-A4. The case of the petitioner was split up

and subsequently, it was renumbered as S.C. 55/2018.

5. As per Annexure-A2 judgment in S.C. No.598/1999 dated

01.7.2002 the case against accused Nos.2, 4, 6, 7 and 9 were

acquitted.

Crl.M.C.No.1677 OF 2021

6. In the mean time, the 1st accused filed Crl.M.C.

No.1608/2003 to quash the proceedings against him in the light of

the judgment of acquittal other accused persons. Taking into account

the judgment of acquittal of other accused persons, proceedings

against the 1st accused in Crime No.22/1988 which was pending as

L.P. No.98/1999 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate

Court-I, Nedumangad, was quashed by this Court. Annexure A3 is

the copy of the judgment in Crl.M.C. No.1608/2003 dated 30.8.2005.

7. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, case

against all other accused except the petitioner herein had been

disposed of and case against the accused Nos.2, 4, 6, 7 and 9 and

also the accused Nos.5 and 8 entered into acquittal after full fledged

trial. The learned counsel would contend that no useful purpose

would be served in continuing the proceedings as against the

petitioner, who is the 3rd accused. As per Annexure-A3 order in

Crl.M.C. No.1608/2003 case against 1 st accused has already been

quashed by this Court as per the order dated 30.8.2005.

8. Annexure-A2 and A3 judgments would reveal that none of

the witnesses including the victims could identify the assailants. Crl.M.C.No.1677 OF 2021

Nothing incriminating came out against against any of the accused

persons who stood trial in the earlier cases. None of the injured

witnesses or eye witnesses stated the name of the petitioner/3rd

accused also. So the continuation of the proceedings against

petitioner in S.C. No.55/2018 would be waste of time and an abuse

of process of law.

9. In the said circumstances, especially in view of the fact

that the case against the prime accused has already been quashed by

this Court, I don't think that any useful purpose would be served in

continuing the proceedings against the petitioner.

In the result, Crl.M.C. stands allowed and the entire

proceedings against the petitioner in Crime No.22/1998 of Vattappara

Police Station, which is pending as S.C. No.55/2018 on the file of

Assistant Sessions Court, Nedumangad is here by quashed.

The Crl.M.C. is allowed as above.

Sd/-

M.R.ANITHA JUDGE SMF Crl.M.C.No.1677 OF 2021

APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 1677/2021

PETITIONERS' ANNEXURE ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO 22/1998 OF VATTAPPARA POLICE STATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 1.7.2002 IN SC NO 598/1999 ON THE FILE OF ASSISTANT SESSIONS COURT, NEDUMANGAD.

ANNEXURE A3 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 30.8.2005 IN CRO.MC NO.1608/2003 ON THE FILE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.

ANNEXURE A4 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 18.12.2017 IN SC NO.2493/2006 ON THE FILE OF ASSISTANT SESSIONS COURT, NEDUMANGAD.

ANNEXURE A5 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF PASSPORT OF PETITIONER BEARING NO.P1669472 ISSUED ON 16.2.2017 AND VISA ENTRIES.

ANNEXURE A6 TRUE COPY OF THE RESIDENT IDENTITY CARD ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY UAE GOVERNMENT BEARING NO.104273149.

ANNEXURE A7 ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT SOWN BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT/DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT DATED 25.2.2021.

ANNEXURE A8 ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 25.2.2021.

//TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter