Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 19138 Ker
Judgement Date : 13 September, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH
MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 22ND BHADRA, 1943
CRL.A NO. 580 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY THE SPECIAL JUDGE UNDER SC/ST (POA)
ACT, ALAPPUZHA, DATED 26.08.2021 IN CRL.MP.NO.1606/2021 IN CRIME
NO.661/2021 OF AMBALAPUZHA POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
APPELLANT/ACCUSED:
AJEESH A.,
AGED 35 YEARS,
S/O. ASHOKAN, MURUGANADU, KARUMADI VILLAGE, AMAYIDA
MURI, AMBALAPUZHA, P.O. ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
SRI.P.VINODKUMAR
SRI.ASHOK AMMANCHY
SRI.VIMAL KUMAR
RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, AMBALAPUZHA
POLICE STATION, THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM PIN:682 031.
2 MRS. REMANI,
AGED 39 YEARS,
D/O. KESVASAN, KOCHUPARAMBIL HOUSE, AMBALAPUZHA (PO),
ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.P.PRASANTH
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
13.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.Appeal No.580 of 2021
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 13th day of September,2021
This appeal is directed against an order passed by
Special Judge under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled
Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Alappuzha in
Crl.M.P.No.1606/2021 in Crime No.661/2021 of
Ambalappuzha Police Station, Alappuzha District.
Crl.M.P.No.1606/2021 is an application filed by the
petitioner/appellant under Section 438 of the Code of criminal
procedure (for short the 'Cr.P.C.') seeking for a direction to
the respondent to release him on bail in the event of his
arrest. The Special Judge has dismissed the application for
the reason that jurisdiction under Section 438 Cr.P.C is barred
under Sections 18 and 18A of the Scheduled Castes and
Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,1989 (for
short 'the Act').
2. The FIS is produced as directed by this Court. The
allegations raised by the defacto complainant in the first Crl.Appeal No.580 of 2021
information statement are prima facie sufficient and
satisfactory to attract the offence allegedly committed by the
appellant under Section 3(1)(s) of the Act. Therefore,
invocation of jurisdiction under Section 438 Cr.P.C is barred
by the Act itself as rightly observed by the court below in the
impugned order.
The appeal fails for the reasons and is dismissed. The
learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant
intends to surrender and seeks for regular bail. There is no
bar for him in moving an application under Section 439
Cr.P.C. and in such an event, the court below shall pass
orders in accordance with law, at the earliest.
Sd/-
MARY JOSEPH JUDGE
MJL Crl.Appeal No.580 of 2021
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE A: TRUE COPY OF THE F.I.R IN CRIME
661/2021 OF AMBALAPUZHA POLICE
STATION
RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P A TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!