Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 18618 Ker
Judgement Date : 8 September, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 17TH BHADRA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 18323 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
JOSEPH ALEXANDER
AGED 59 YEARS
S/P P.V.JOSEPH, PUTHUVELIL HOUSE, PALLICKACHIRA P.O,
PAIPAD VILLAGE, CHANGANACHERRRY TALUK-686537.
BY ADVS.
K.SHAJ
C.IJLAL
RESHMA.P.
ARUN CHAND
JOSEPH MARY DAS
BHARAT VIJAY P.
MAJID MUHAMMED K.
ANANDU R.
ARUL K.S
NEERAJA GOWRI A.S
GAYATHRI SATHYAN
VINAYAK G MENON
RENJIT GEORGE
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE COMMISSIONER OF LAND REVENUE
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF LAND REVENUE, PUBLIC
OFFICE BUILDING, MUSEUM ROAD,
OPPOSITE ZOO, VIKAS BHAVAN P.O,
THIRUVANANTHAPURM-695033.
2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
COLLECTORATE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, KOTTAYAM-686002.
3 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF SURVEY,
COLLECTORATE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, KOTTAYAM-686002.
4 THE DISTRICT SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT,
COLLECTORATE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, KOTTAYAM-686002.
5 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS,
WP(C) NO. 18323 OF 2021 2
COLLECTORATE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, KOTTAYAM-686002.
6 THE TAHSILDAR,
CIVIL STATION, TALUK OFFICE, CHANGANACHERRY TALUK,
CHANGANACHERRY-686101.
7 THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR
CIVIL STATION , TALUK OFFICE, CHANGANACHERRY
TALUK, CHANGANACHERRY-686101.
8 THE VILLAGE OFFICER
VILLAGE OFFICE, PAIPAD VILLAGE, PAIPAD,
CHANGANACHERRY -686537.
9 VIGILANCE AND ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU
REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF
POLICE, KOTTAYAM UNIT, KOTTAYAM-686001.
10 LAWRENCE JOHN
SNEHATHEERAM HOUSE, NALUKODI P.O, PAIPAD,
CHANGANACHERRY-686548.
BY ADV.
SMT.AMMINIKUTTY, SR GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 08.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 18323 OF 2021 3
JUDGMENT
On the strength of various averments and
assertions in this writ petition, the petitioner
seeks that Ext.P11 be set aside; and in the
alternative, that Ext.P9 application made by him
under Section 13A of the Kerala Survey and
Boundaries Act, 1961, be directed to be disposed of
by the 2nd respondent within a time frame - until
which time, further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P11
be ordered to be deferred.
2. The learned learned Senior Government
Pleader, Smt.Amminikutty, submitted that challenge
against Ext.P11 may not be acceded to by this Court
at this stage because, admittedly, the petitioner
has approached the 2nd respondent with Ext.P9. She
then submitted that there does not appear to be any
legal impediment in Ext.P9 being disposed of by the
said respondent; but prayed that this Court may not
make any affirmative declarations on the entitlement
of the petitioner to any relief and leave it to be
decided by the competent Authority, in terms of law.
In the afore circumstances, I order this writ
petition and direct the 2nd respondent to dispose of
Ext.P9 application, following due procedure and
after affording an opportunity of being heard to the
petitioner; thus culminating in an appropriate order
thereon, as expeditiously as is possible.
Needless to say, until the afore exercise is
completed and the resultant order communicated to
the petitioner, all further action pursuant to
Ext.P11 shall stand deferred; and I make it further
clear that this Court has not considered the
petitioner's contentions against the said order on
its merits, and that they are all left open to be
pursued by him in future, if so required.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE MC/8.9
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 18323/2021
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DATED 24/05/2014 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER IN FORM NO.10 AS PER THE KERALA SURVEY MANUAL BEFORE THE 6TH RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF REPORT NO.B5-822/14 DATED 03.07.2014 SUBMITTED BY THE 8TH RESPONDENT TO THE 7TH RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P3 THE TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO.B7/8222/14 DATED 16/07/2014 ISSUED BY THE 7TH RESPONDENT TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P4 THE TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO.S.D.B7/8222/14 DATED 14/08/2014 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE 7TH RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P5 THE TRUE COPY OF MEMORANDUM OF ALTERNATIONS TO BE MADE IN THE RECORDS OF PAIPAD VILLAGE IN RESPECT OF SURVEY NO.449 IN SUB-DIVISION NO.6 IN FORM NO,97 IN CHAPTER XVI OF THE KERALA SURVEY MANUEL PREPARED BY THE OFFICE OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P6 THE TRUE COPY OF FORM NO.93 IN CHAPTER XVI OF THE KERALA SURVEY MANUEL ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE 6TH RESPONDENT FOR NECESSARY CHANGES IN THE VILLAGE RECORDS IN RESPECT OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PETITIONER.
Exhibit P7 THE TRUE COPY OF QUICK VERIFICATION REVISED REPORT OF THE 9TH RESPONDENT DATED 03.04.2018.
Exhibit P8 THE TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO.C/256/2019/K.DIS DATED 22/05/2019 ISSUED BY CONVENER OF DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE FOR REGULARISATION OF UNAUTHORISED CONSTRUCTIONS AND TOWN PLANNER, KOTTAYAM.
Exhibit P9 THE TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 15.01.2019 ALONG WITH THE COPY OF THE APPLICATION WITH ENDORSEMENT RECEIVED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER THE RTI ACT.
Exhibit P10 THE TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO.DCKTTM/6211/2016-C5 DATED 18/04/2018 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P11 THE TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO.L.R.K5-
46700/2015 DATED 30.11.2020 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!