Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 18391 Ker
Judgement Date : 7 September, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 16TH BHADRA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 3380 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
NAWAS, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O. BAVUMMAL ABUBACKER,
MAKKADIPARAMBIL VEEDU, GYM ROAD, PONNANI (P.O)
PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT
BY ADV K.B.ARUNKUMAR
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF
THRISSUR, RAMAVARMAPURAM (PO)
THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN 680 631
2 THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
VADAKKEKAD POLICE STATION, KADIKKAD,
KERALA PIN 679 561
3 BEEVATHUKUTTY, W/O. ABUBACKER, BAVUMMAL,
EDAKKARA, ANDATHODU (PO), CHAVAKKAD TALUK,
THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN 679 564
4 NIRZIL, S/O.ASHRAF, BAVUMMAL EDAKKARA,
ANADATHODU (PO), CHAVAKKAD TALUK,
THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN 679 564
BY ADVS.
GOVERNMENT PLEADER - SRI.E.C.BINEESH
SMT.K.NANDINI
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
07.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WPC 3380/21
2
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court
alleging that the respondents-Police Officers are
illegally intervening in his civil rights and
forcing him to hand over the key of his shop-
room, which is the subject matter of Ext.P1 Suit,
to respondents 3 and 4. He says that the action
of respondents 1 and 2 is in flagrant violation
of law and therefore, prays that they be directed
not to harass him in any manner whatsoever.
2. In response, the learned Government
Pleader - Sri.E.C.Bineesh, submitted that the
above allegations of the petitioner are wholly
untrue and that a statement has been filed on
behalf of the 1st respondent, wherein, it has been
explained that he was never summoned to the
Police Station nor was he ever compelled to hand
over the key of the shop room to the party
respondents. He, therefore, prayed that this Writ WPC 3380/21
Petition be dismissed with exemplary costs.
3. In reply, Sri.K.B.Arun Kumar - learned
counsel for the petitioner, submitted that it is
only because of the pendency of this Writ
Petition that the harassment by respondents 1 and
2 has now ceased and therefore, prayed that this
Writ Petition be ordered, recording the averments
in the statement filed on behalf of the 1st
respondent.
In the afore circumstances, I close this Writ
Petition, recording the afore submissions of the
learned Government Pleader; with a resultant
direction to respondents 1 and 2 to summon the
petitioner, if it becomes so required for any
purpose in future, only after issuing him an
appropriate notice under Section 41A of the Code
of Criminal Procedure.
Sd/-
RR DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
JUDGE
WPC 3380/21
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 3380/2021
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S NO.
1123/2019
EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT
AND COUNTER CLAIM FILED BY THE
PETITIONER IN EXHIBIT P-1
EXHIBIT P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LEASE DEED DATED
20-10-2020
EXHIBIT P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION
DATED 05-02-2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER THROUGH E-MAIL BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT R3(a): PHOTOCOPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DATED 23/12/2020.
EXHIBIT R3(b): THE COPY OF THE LEGAL NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 19/03/2021.
EXHIBIT R3(c): THE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY 3RD RESPONDENT BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 03/02/2018.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!