Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Peter E.I vs The Village Officer
2021 Latest Caselaw 21411 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 21411 Ker
Judgement Date : 29 October, 2021

Kerala High Court
Peter E.I vs The Village Officer on 29 October, 2021
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
     FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 7TH KARTHIKA, 1943
                       WP(C) NO. 12397 OF 2020
PETITIONER:

          PETER E.I, AGED 63 YEARS,
          S/O.IGNATIOUS, EDAKKATTU HOUSE, KUMBALANGI NORTH,
          KOCHI-682007.

          BY ADV S.SUJIN



RESPONDENTS:

    1     THE VILLAGE OFFICER,
          KUMBALANGI, VILLAGE OFFICE, KOCHI, PIN-682007.

    2     THE TAHSILDAR,
          TALUK OFFICE, FORT KOCHI, KOCHI, PIN-682001.

    3     THE SUB REGISTRAR,
          OFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, MATTANCHERRY,
          KOCHI, PIN-682002.

    4     THE STATE OF KERALA,
          REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY,
          GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001.

          BY ADV.SRI.ASHWIN SETHUMADHAVAN - SR.GP


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
29.10.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 12397 OF 2020
                               -2-

                             JUDGMENT

The petitioner submits that when he approached

the 1st respondent - Village Officer, to remit land

tax with respect to the property owned by him, he

was asked to first apply for and obtain an

encumbrance certificate with respect to it. He

says that he consequently approached the 3rd

respondent - Sub Registrar for the said

certificate; but that no action has been taken

thereon until now and that this is now causing him

irreparable prejudice, because he is being

incapacitated from remitting land tax on his own

property.

2. However, the learned Senior Government

Pleader - Sri.Ashwin Sethumadhavan, submitted that

a statement has been filed on record on behalf of

the 1st respondent, wherein, it has been shown that

only a portion of the petitioner's property has WP(C) NO. 12397 OF 2020

been assessed to tax; while the Transfer of

Registry of the others have not yet been effected

in his name.

3. The learned Senior Government Pleader

submitted that it is only to help the petitioner

that the 1st respondent requested him to obtain an

encumbrance certificate from the 3rd respondent. He

added that once the said certificate is obtained,

all requisite action for allowing the petitioner

to remit land tax, after effecting the Transfer of

Registry of the property in question in his

favour, will be completed.

4. It is luculent from the afore submissions

of the learned Senior Government Pleader that the

petitioner's request for remittance of land tax

has not yet been rejected; but he has only been

asked to obtain an encumbrance certificate from

the 3rd respondent, for which, he says that he has

already been made an application. However, since WP(C) NO. 12397 OF 2020

the said application is not on record, I am of the

firm view that petitioner must be directed to

approach the 3rd respondent with a fresh

application, so that he can then be directed to be

disposed of it without any delay.

Resultantly, I order this writ petition and

permit the petitioner to approach the 3rd

respondent with an application for issuance of

encumbrance certificate of the property covered by

his title documents; and if this is done within a

period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a

copy of this judgment, said Authority shall

consider the same and issue the said certificate

as expeditiously as is possible, but not later

than one week thereafter.

On the petitioner obtaining the encumbrance

certificate as afore, he will be at liberty to

approach the 1st respondent, who shall thereupon

consider his request for Transfer of Registry of WP(C) NO. 12397 OF 2020

the extents which have not yet been given the said

benefit, and to remit the land tax on all his

property covered by the title documents, without

any avoidable delay, but not later than two weeks

thereafter.

Sd/-

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE akv WP(C) NO. 12397 OF 2020

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 12397/2020

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT FOR BASIC TAX ISSUED BY THE SPECIAL VILLAGE OFFICER, DATED 17.06.2019

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT FOR BASIC TAX ISSUED BY THE SPECIAL VILLAGE OFFICER, DATED 23.09.2019.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT FOR BASIC TAX ISSUED BY THE SPECIAL VILLAGE OFFICER, DATED 23.09.2019.

RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS : NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter