Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.G.Divakaran & Others vs Thankachan P.I. & Another
2021 Latest Caselaw 20809 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 20809 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 October, 2021

Kerala High Court
K.G.Divakaran & Others vs Thankachan P.I. & Another on 6 October, 2021
MACA NO. 1526 OF 2011
                                1


           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                             PRESENT
                THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
 WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 14TH ASWINA, 1943
                      MACA NO. 1526 OF 2011
    AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OPMV 810/2006 OF MOTOR
        ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, OTTAPPALAM, PALAKKAD
APPELLANT/S:
    1     K.G.DIVAKARAN, AGED 64 YEARS, S/O.GOVINDAN,
          KURUVIKUNNEL HOUSE, PULAKKODE P.O.,,
          CHELAKKARA(VIA), THRISSUR DISTRICT.

    2     DEVAKY DIVAKARAN AGED 58 YEARS, W/O. DIVAKARAN,
          KURUVIKUNNEL HOUSE,, PULAKKODE P.O.,
          CHELAKKARA(VIA),THRISSUR DISTRICT.

    3     DEEPA RAVI AGED 36 YEARS W/O. RAVI, KURUVIKUNNEL
          HOUSE, PULAKKODE P.O.,, CHELAKKARA(VIA),THRISSUR
          DISTRICT.

    4     SHEEBA AGED 31 YEARS D/O. DIVAKARAN
          KURUVIKUNNEL HOUSE, PULAKKODE P.O.,,
          CHELAKKARA(VIA),THRISSUR DISTRICT.

          BY ADV SRI.SHEJI P.ABRAHAM
RESPONDENT/S:

    1     THANKACHAN P.I., PISHARATH HOUSE, KATTILAPOOVAM
          P.O.,, THRISSUR-680 028.

    2     ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
          DIVISIONAL OFFICE, 3RD FLOOR, MAHESWARI BUILDING,,
          M.G.ROAD, THRISSUR-680 603., (POLICY NO.4554/2006
          VALID FROM 27.10.2005 TO, 26.10.2006).

          BY ADVS.
          SRI.P.JACOB MATHEW
          SRI.MATHEWS JACOB SR.
     THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 06.10.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
 MACA NO. 1526 OF 2011
                               2


                        JUDGMENT

The appellants were the petitioners in OP(MV)

No.810/2006 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims

Tribunal, Ottapalam. The respondents in the appeal were

the respondents before the Tribunal.

2. The appellants had filed the claim petition under

Section 163 A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (in short 'Act')

claiming compensation on account of the death of Dileep

(deceased), son of the appellants 1 and 2, husband of the 3 rd

appellant and brother of the 4th appellant. It was their case

in the claim petition that, on 30.06.2006, while the deceased

was riding a motor cycle bearing registration No.KL-8/S-

3642 through Adakkode - Pulakkode, the vehicle skidded on

the road and the deceased sustained serious injuries. The

deceased rushed to the Chelakkara Government Hospital,

but he lost his life. The deceased was the sole bread-winner

of the family. The deceased was a rubber tapper by

profession earning a monthly income of Rs.3,250/-. The 1 st

respondent was the owner and the 2 nd respondent was the

insurer of the motor cycle. Hence, the appellants claimed a MACA NO. 1526 OF 2011

compensation of Rs.4,75,500/- from the respondents, which

was limited to Rs.4,00,000/-

3. The 1st respondent did not contest the proceedings.

4. The 2nd respondent had fled a written statement,

interalia, contending that the insurance policy would not

cover the liability of the deceased-who was the rider of the

motor cycle. The 2nd respondent had not collected any

additional premium to cover the rider of the motor cycle. It

was also contended that the insurance policy was only an

'Act Policy'. Therefore, the 2nd respondent was not liable to

pay any amount as compensation.

5. The appellants produced and marked Exts.A1 to A7

in evidence. The 2nd respondent produced Ext.B1 insurance

policy and Ext.B2 kaicheet and marked it in evidence.

6. The Tribunal, after analysing the pleadings and

materials on record, dismissed the claim petition following

the decision of this Court in United India Insurance Co.

Ltd vs. Vijayarajan [2009 (3) KLT 269], wherein it was held

that the legal representatives of the deceased step into the

shoes of the owner of the motor cycle and, therefore, were MACA NO. 1526 OF 2011

not entitled to compensation under Section 163 A of the Act.

7. Aggrieved by the impugned award, the petitioners

are in appeal.

8. Heard; Sri.Sheji P. Abraham, the learned counsel

appearing for the appellants and Sri. P. Jacob Mathew, the

learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent/insurer.

9. The question that arises for consideration in this

appeal is whether the dismissal of the claim petition by the

Tribunal is sustainable in law or not.

10. The fact that the deceased lost his life in an

accident on 30.06.2006 is evident from Ext.A5 charge sheet.

11. Undisputedly, the accident was a self accident due

to the skidding of the motor cycle. It is trite law that in a

claim under Section 163 A, the owner/rider of the two-

wheeler is not entitled for compensation from the insurer, if

the policy is an 'Act Policy'.

12. Nevertheless, in Ramkhiladi and another vs.

United India Insurance Company Ltd. and MACA NO. 1526 OF 2011

another[(2020) 2 SCC 550], the Honourable Supreme Court

has in paragraph 9.8 held that, in the case of a personal

accident the owner/driver is entitled to a sum of

Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) as the rider would step

into shoes of the owner, provided the same is stipulated in

the insurance policy.

13. On a perusal of Ext.B1 insurance policy, it is seen

that the insurer has issued the policy with a personal

accident cover under Section 3, for the owner-driver to the

tune of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees One Lakh only).

14. In view of the above policy conditions in Ext.B1

insurance policy read with the ratio in paragraph 9.8 in

Ramkhiladi (supra), I hold that the appellants are entitled

for an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupess One Lakh only) as

personal accident cover as provided under Ext.B1 policy.

In the result, the appeal is allowed in part by setting

aside the impugned award of the Tribunal, and by

permitting the appellants to realise an amount of

Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) from the 2nd

respondent with interest at the rate of 7% per annum, from MACA NO. 1526 OF 2011

the date of petition till the date of realisation, after

deducting interest for a period of 571 days as ordered by by

this Court on 30.05.2019 in C.M.Appln. No.2333/2011, and a

cost of Rs.3,000/-. The 2nd respondent is directed to deposit

the above amount of Rs.1,00,000/- with interest and cost

before the Tribunal within a period of 60 days from the date

of receipt of a certified copy of the judgment. The Tribunal

shall disburse the compensation amount to to the appellants

2 and 3 in equal shares and in accordance with law.

Sd/-

C.S.DIAS JUDGE rkc

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter