Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vidya Immanual @ Vidya Pious vs State Of Kerala
2021 Latest Caselaw 23742 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23742 Ker
Judgement Date : 30 November, 2021

Kerala High Court
Vidya Immanual @ Vidya Pious vs State Of Kerala on 30 November, 2021
                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                       PRESENT
                        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARIPAL
           TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA, 1943
                                CRL.MC NO. 4852 OF 2021
                    (CRIME NO. 1361 OF 2019 OF THE KURUVILANGAD-I)
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CMP 2167/2021 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS ,
                                        PALA
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:


             VIDYA IMMANUAL @ VIDYA PIOUS
             AGED 32 YEARS
             D/O PIOUS, PARAKKEL VEEDU,
             THAICKAL.P.O, OTTASMERI MURI,
             KADAKKARAPPALLY, CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA-688524.

             BY ADVS.
             ABRAHAM SAMSON
             LOVELY SAMSON



RESPONDENT/STATE:


             STATE OF KERALA
             REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
             ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-31.

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.11.2021, THE COURT ON
THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 Crl.M.C.No. 4852 OF 2021
                                 2

                              ORDER

Petitioner is the accused in Crime No. 1361 of 2019 of

Kuruvilangad police station, which was registered alleging offence

punishable under Section 420 read with Section 34 of the IPC.

2. It is submitted that the petitioner is a divorcee, having two

children. Earlier she was working in Dubai and now she wants to

go abroad seeking employment in Israel. With that intention she

moved Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court-I, Pala seeking

permanent exemption from attending the Court. But, by the

impugned order dated 11th August 2021, the application was

dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, she has moved this Court

under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash the Ext. A1 order dated

16.08.2021.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there

are four cases against her, in Chavara, Irinjalakkuda, Kattappana,

and Kuruvilangadu police stations, all are on the same lines. She

is on bail in all cases. She had moved similar petitions before all

jurisdictional Courts, but Irinjalakkuda and Kattappna Courts Crl.M.C.No. 4852 OF 2021

alone permitted her to go abroad, subject to certain conditions. If

only, she is able to get permission in all the crimes she will be able

to go abroad. According to the counsel, by finding out a suitable

employment, she will have to eke out her livelihood. She is

prepared to reach back station at any time, as and when directed

by the Court. It is a crime of the year 2019, the case is still under

investigation and it may take long time to complete the

investigation and file the final report. She is now on bail in all the

cases and is prepared to appear before the Investigating Officer or

the jurisdictional Court at any time as directed.

4. Annexure-A1 order indicates that the petitioner faces

allegations under Section 420 read with Section 34 of the IPC.

Bail was granted to her with a condition that she shall not go

abroad without the permission of the jurisdictional Court.

Investigation in the crime is still underway. It is uncertain as to

when investigation will be completed. In such a contingency, it is

improper to deny her legitimate right to seek employment abroad.

5. So long as the police have not formed an opinion about Crl.M.C.No. 4852 OF 2021

the complicity of the petitioner, it is inequitable to decline such a

request. At this stage, what is important is whether her presence

can be ensured if and when a charge sheet is filed against her.

That can be ensured by imposing appropriate conditions. After

considering rival contentions and hearing the learned Public

Prosecutor, it seems that the petitioner can be permitted to go

abroad for a period of one year, subject to the following

conditions:-

(i) she shall execute a bond for Rs.5,00,000/-(Rupees five

lakhs only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to

the satisfaction of the Magistrate; one of the sureties shall be a

near relative of the petitioner;

(ii) she shall furnish her itinerary before the Investigating

Officer and also the Chief Ministerial Officer of the jurisdictional

Court and also furnish her e-mail address, WhatsApp number, and

address abroad. Any change in address also shall be notified;

(iii) she shall file an affidavit undertaking to appear before

the Court/Investigating Officer as and when necessary. Copy of Crl.M.C.No. 4852 OF 2021

the affidavit shall be furnished to the Regional Passport Officer

also.

The Criminal Miscellaneous Case is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

K. HARIPAL JUDGE RMV/30/11/2021 Crl.M.C.No. 4852 OF 2021

APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 4852/2021

PETITIONER ANNEXURE

Annexure A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER IN CMP 2167/2021 IN CRIME NO.1361/2019 DATED 16.08.2021 OF JFCM-1, KURUVILANGAD(IMPUNGED ORDER)

Annexure A2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 6.8.2021 IN CMP 1449/2021 IN CC 102/2020 OF THE JFCM-I, KATTAPANA-I

Annexure A3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN CMP 1431/21 IN CC 102/2020 OF THE JFCM, KATTAPPANA-I, DATED 28.7.2021.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter