Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Davis @ Thattakom Davis vs Sereena Nishad
2021 Latest Caselaw 23713 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23713 Ker
Judgement Date : 30 November, 2021

Kerala High Court
Davis @ Thattakom Davis vs Sereena Nishad on 30 November, 2021
                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                         PRESENT

                       THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARIPAL

            TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA, 1943

                                  CRL.MC NO. 5846 OF 2020

           (CRIME NO.258/2019 OF VELLIKULANGARA POLICE STATION, THRISSUR)

 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CP 101/2020 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS - I,

                                       CHALAKUDY

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 &3:

      1       DAVIS @ THATTAKOM DAVIS
              AGED 50 YEARS
              S/O.ANTHONY, THATTOKATH HOUSE, RANDUKAI DESOM, KUTTICHIRA
              VILLAGE, CHAIPPANKUZHY, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680724.

      2       JOY,
              AGED 49 YEARS
              S/O.ANTHONY, THATTOKATH HOUSE, RANDUKAI DESOM, KUTTICHIRA
              VILLAGE, CHAIPPANKUZHY, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680724.

              BY ADVS.
              PRABHU K.N.
              SHRI.MANUMON A.


RESPONDENTS/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT, INJURED & STATE:

      1       SEREENA NISHAD
              AGED 41 YEARS
              W/O.NISHAD, KAYAMKULAM HOUSE, MOSCO NAGAR, POTTA P.O., POTTA
              VILLAGE, CHALAKUDY THALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680722.

      2       NISHAD
              AGED 43 YEARS
              S/O.SUBAIR, KAYAMKULAM HOUSE, MOSCO NAGAR, POTTA P.O., POTTA
              VILLAGE, CHALAKUDY THALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680722.

      3       STATE OF KERALA,
              REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-
              682031.

              BY ADV JAYAN KUTTICHAKKU


OTHER PRESENT:

              ADV.M.C.ASHI (PP)


      THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.11.2021, THE COURT

ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 Crl.M.C.No. 5846 OF 2020
                                 2

                              ORDER

Petitioners are the accused 1 and 3 in C.P. No.101 of 2020

pending before the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court,

Chalakudy which arose from Crime No. 258 of 2019

Vellikkulangara police station, Thrissur. The allegations against

the petitioners are under Sections 323, 324, 326, 307, 379, 201

read with section 34 of the IPC. The petitioners have moved this

court for quashing the proceedings on the ground of settlement

reached with the party respondents 1 and 2.

2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and also the

learned Public Prosecutor.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor has strongly opposed the

acceptance of settlement reached between parties. Allegations

against the petitioners and the 2nd accused are that on 08.05.2019

at 19.00 hours, with the promise of settling the dispute between

the 2nd respondent and the 1st petitioner, called the 2nd respondent

to the house of the 1st petitioner; when the 2nd respondent reached

in front of the house on his motor cycle, 2 nd petitioner/3rd accused Crl.M.C.No. 5846 OF 2020

hit him down from behind with a wooden stick, when he fell

down, all the accused stamped him, the 1 st petitioner struck him

with a gun and caused grievous hurt to both his legs and right

hand and thus made attempts against his life; they also alleged to

have thieved his two mobile phones and a sum of Rs. 6500/-

carried by him. They also face allegations of destruction of

evidence.

4. Having regard to the nature and gravity of the allegations,

there is considerable force in the objections raised by the learned

Public Prosecutor. Offences under Sections 326 and 307 are the

major counts alleged against the petitioners. I have also gone

through the wound certificates in respect of the 2nd respondent. He

had suffered very serious injuries in the occurrence. He was taken

to the hospital with a puncture wound on the right 1/3rd forearm

over 1/3rd proximal aspect and other injuries. Further investigation

revealed that he suffered fracture on both bones, below leg also.

Moreover, an offence under section 307 of the IPC cannot be

considered for quashing on the ground of settlement in view of the Crl.M.C.No. 5846 OF 2020

decision in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and another [2012

AIR SCW 5333].

5. The learned Public Prosecutor also pointed out that the 1 st

petitioner is a history-sheeter in the sense that he has fourteen

criminal cases to his credit. Moreover, the 2 nd accused is shown

absconding and has not come into the picture at all. On these

considerations, the Criminal Miscellaneous Case is devoid of

merits and is liable to be dismissed. Dismissed.

Sd/-

K. HARIPAL JUDGE RMV/30/11/2021 Crl.M.C.No. 5846 OF 2020

APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 5846/2020

PETITIONER ANNEXURE

ANNEXURE A1 SEALED COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT IN CRIME 258/2019 OF VELLIKULANGARA POLICE STATION, DATED 09.05.2019.

ANNEXURE A2 SEALED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN C.P.NO.101/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, CHALAKUDY ARISING OUT OF CRIME 258/2019 OF VELLIKULANGARA POLICE STATION DATED 06.10.2020.

ANNEXURE A3 AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT/INJURED DATED 09.12.2020.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter