Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23400 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 November, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 33300 OF 2015
PETITIONER:
SASI KUMAR, AGED 61 YEARS, S/O KUMARAN,
RESIDING IN HOUSE NO.9/397, PALLIPURAM PANCHAYAT, CHERAI MURI, CHERAI,
PALLIPURAM, KOCHI.
BY ADVS.
SRI.C.P.UDAYABHANU
SRI.R.MANOJ
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT,
STATE SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 001.
2 THE SECRETARY
KOTTUVALLY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, VALLUVALLY, KOONAMMAVU P.O.
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683 518
3 THE KERALA COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN-695001.
R1- SRI.JACOB E SIMON,SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER
R3- SRI.M.P.PRAKASH, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.11.2021, THE COURT
ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 33300 OF 2015
:: 2 ::
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 25th day of November 2021
This writ petition is filed by the petitioner challenging Ext.P3 order
passed by the Secretary of the Kottuvalli Grama panchayat - the second
respondent dated 1.11.2014 informing the petitioner that the building
permit application submitted by the petitioner cannot be granted for the
reason that the property in question would come under the Coastal
Regulation Zone in accordance with the notification issued by the
Government of India in the year 2011. It is thus, challenging the legality and
correctness of Ext.P3, this writ petition is filed.
2. The Coastal Zone Management Authority namely, the third
respondent has filed a statement before this court. It is stated that the land
belonging to the petitioner lies in the CRZ area where new construction of
residential buildings is not permissible and further that the building site lies
in "No Development Zone of CRZ-III category".
3. I have heard Sri.C.P.Udayabhanu, learned counsel for the
petitioner; Sri.Jacob E. Simon, learned Senior Government Pleader for the
State; Sri.M.P.Prakash for Kerala Coastal Zone Management Authority and
perused the pleadings and materials on record. WP(C) NO. 33300 OF 2015 :: 3 ::
4. The discussion of facts made above would make it clear that the
property of the petitioner situated in the Sy.No.88/2B of Kottuvally Village,
Paravur Thaluk having an extent of 8.09 Ares according to the Panchayat as
well as the Coastal Zone Management Authority would come under the
notification issued by the Government of India in the year 2011 and is a 'No
Development Zone of CRZ III'.
5. Viewed in that circumstances, it cannot be said that Ext.P3 order
passed by the Secretary of the Grama Panchayat is irregular or illegal. If the
property comes under the provisions of the CRZ notification, 2011 it was for
the petitioner to file a suitable application along with building permit
application before the Secretary of the Grama Panchayat, which would have
enabled the Secretary to forward the same to the Coastal Zone Management
Authority for appropriate decision. Petitioner has not cared to take any
such action.
6. In that view of the matter, I do not think there is any illegality in
Ext.P3 order passed by the Secretary of the Grama Panchayat. However, I
am of the considered opinion that an opportunity can be given to the
petitioner to file suitable application. In that view of the matter, petitioner
is granted the liberty to file suitable building permit application in
accordance with the Kerala Panchayat Building Rules, 2019 before the WP(C) NO. 33300 OF 2015 :: 4 ::
Secretary of the Grama Panchayat and along with the same, petitioner is also
at liberty to file suitable application under the Coastal Zone Management
Notification 2011. If the Secretary receives any such application from the
petitioner, it shall be forwarded to the Coastal Zone Management Authority
at the earliest possible and at any rate within two weeks from the date of
receipt of the application from the petitioner. The Coastal Zone
Management Authority shall consider the application in accordance with the
prevailing notification at the earliest and at any rate within two months
thereafter and forward the same to the Secretary at the earliest possible.
Thereafter the Secretary would be at liberty to consider the building permit
application in terms of the decision taken by the Coastal Zone Management
Authority as per law.
Writ petition is disposed of.
SD/-
SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE jes WP(C) NO. 33300 OF 2015 :: 5 ::
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED EXECUTED IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER DATED 5.03.2013 AND BEARING NO.1152/1 OF PARAVUR SUB REGISTRY
P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE LATEST TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KOTTUVALLY
P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 01.11.2014
// TRUE COPY //
P.S. TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!