Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23397 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 November, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH
Thursday, the 25th day of November 2021 / 4th Agrahayana, 1943
CRL.M.APPL.NO.2/2021 IN CRL.A NO. 482 OF 2021
SC (NDPS) 33/2018 OF SPECIAL COURT (NDPS ACT CASES), THODUPUZHA,
IDUKKI
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.4:
VIMAL RADHAKRISHNAN, AGED 24 YEARS, S/O RADHAKRISHNAN,
PANACHAYIL HOUSE, KOLANY KARA, THODUPUZHA TALUK, THODUPUZHA,
IDUKKI DISTRICT,KERALA-685 608
RESPONDENTS/STATE/APPELLANT NO.1:
1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031.
2. SAJAN SAMUEL, AGED 38/17, S/O SAMUEL JOSHWA, PARASSERIL
HOUSE, ERUMAPRA KARA, MELUKAVUMATTOM P.O.MELUKAVUMATTOM
VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT 686652
Application praying that in the circumstances stated
therein the High Court be pleased to suspend and stay the
execution of sentence imposed on the Petitioner vide order dated
16.02.2021 in S.C.(NDPS) No. 33/2018 passed by the Court of the
Special Judge for NDPS Act Cases, Thodupuzha in the interest of
justice.
This Application coming on for orders upon perusing
the application and upon hearing the arguments of RENJITH
B.MARAR, LAKSHMI.N.KAIMAL, ARUN POOMULLI, SURABHI SANTHOSH,
MEERA M., SRILAKSHMI NAIR R, BALASUBRAMANIAM R., Advocates for
the petitioner and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent 1
and of P.K.VARGHESE, P.S.ANISHAD, K.R.ARUN KRISHNAN, P.T.MANOJ,
T.M.SUDHEER, SANJANA RACHEL JOSE, REGHU SREEDHARAN, advocates
for the Respondnent 2, the court passed the following:
(PTO)
MARY JOSEPH, J.
=============================
Crl.M.A Nos.1 & 2 of 2021
in
Crl.A No.482 of 2021
=============================
Dated this the 25th day of November, 2021
ORDER
C.M.Appln. No.1 of 2021 :
This is an application seeking to suspend the execution of the
sentence assailed in this appeal. The applicant is the first accused. It is
submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor that another crime was
registered against him and in that prosecution, the petitioner was
directed to pay the fine amount. The petitioner has paid the fine also.
Therefore, this Court is inclined to allow the application. The execution
of the sentence imposed by the judgment assailed is suspended on
execution of a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) with two
solvent sureties for the likesum and also on deposit of Rs.40,000/-
(Rupees forty thousand only) towards the fine amount, before the trial
court.
Crl.M.A No.2 of 2021 :
This is an application seeking to suspend the execution of the
sentence assailed in this appeal. The applicant is the fourth Crl.M.A Nos.1 & 2 of 2021
accused. It is reported by the learned Public Prosecutor that the
quantity of Ganja involved is only 1.05 kg and that criminal
antecedents are not pending against the petitioner. In the abovesaid
circumstances, this Court is inclined to allow the application. The
sentence imposed by the judgment under challenge is suspended on
execution by the petitioner of a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one
lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the likesum and also on deposit
of Rs.40,000/-(Rupees forty thousand only) towards the fine amount,
before the trial court.
sd/-
MARY JOSEPH,
JUDGE
amk
25-11-2021 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!