Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23329 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 November, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 26235 OF 2021
PETITIONERS:
1 RAFEEK K.,
AGED 36 YEARS
S/O. KUNJALI, R/O. KADUVANDIL HOUSE, THEKKUMBAGAM,
THRIPPUNITHURA, KERALA-682301.
2 RIYAS K.,
AGED 41 YEARS
S/O. KUNJALI, R/O. KADUVANDIL HOUSE, THEKKUMBAGAM,
THRIPPUNITHURA, KERALA-682301.
3 KUNJALI K.,
AGED 67 YEARS
S/O. KUNJU MOHAMMED, R/O. KADUVANDIL HOUSE,
THEKKUMBAGAM, THRIPPUNITHURA, KERALA-682301.
BY ADVS.
M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS
SHAKTHI PRAKASH
PRATHEEK VISWANATHAN
HARIKRISHNAN M.S.
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
2 THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA) NO.1,
KOCHI METRO RAILWAY PROJECT, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD,
ERNAKULAM-682030.
3 THE KOCHI METRO RAIL LIMITED,
4TH FLOOR, JLN METRO STATION, KALOOR, COCHIN-682017,
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
4 THE HDFC BANK,
RETAIL LOAN SERVICE CENTRE, 1ST FLOOR, SUDHAS BUILDING,
WP(C) NO. 26235 OF 2021
2
MADHAVA PHARMACY JUNCTION, BANERJI ROAD, ERNAKULAM-
682018, REPRESENTED BY BRANCH MANAGER.
BY ADV P.SATHISAN
SMT. M.U VIJAYALAKSHMI.SC.
SR GP SMT AMMINIKKUTTY
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
25.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 26235 OF 2021
3
JUDGMENT
The petitioners have approached this Court
seeking a direction to the 4th respondent -
HDFC Bank, to submit the original of the title
deeds of their property before the Competent
Authority for Land Acquisition (CALA), acting
under the provisions of the National Highway
Act - which has been retained by them under an
equitable mortgage executed by her - in terms
of the request made by them in Ext.P2, so that
the compensation for the portion of the
property acquired from it, can be released into
the loan account itself.
2. The petitioners explain that since only
a portion of the property covered by the title
document retained by the Bank has been
acquired, unless it is produced before the
CALA, eligible compensation will not be
released and that they have no objection in the WP(C) NO. 26235 OF 2021
said document being either returned to the Bank
or a certified copy of it being retained by the
CALA for such purpose. They then unequivocally
undertook that merely because of the request
which they are now making, they will not impel
contention that they had not created an
equitable mortgage on the property in question.
3. Sri.P.Sathisan - learned counsel
appearing for the 4th respondent - Bank,
submitted that since the amount of compensation
with respect to the acquired property is to be
remitted to the loan account, it is also in the
interest of his client to produce the document
before the CALA. He submitted that his client
had earlier done so and is willing to do so
again, but that they are only making a request
that the CALA be directed to retain a certified
copy of the same and return the original to his
client, so that they can retain it in safe
custody, to proceed against the remaining WP(C) NO. 26235 OF 2021
property for recovery of the balance loan
amount.
4. Smt.K.Amminikutty - learned Senior
Government Pleader, submitted that once the 4th
respondent produces the title document before
the CALA, he will examine the same and then
decide the manner in which it has to be
retained or returned; however, stating that
there will be no prejudice to the Bank because
the said Authority will not return it to the
petitioners but only to them and no one else.
She added that unless the 4th respondent-Bank
produces the title document, the compensation
eligible for the acquired property cannot be
released.
5. Smt.Athira.T.S., representing
Smt.M.U.Vijayalakshmi- learned Standing Counsel
for the Kochi Metro Rail Limited (KMRL),
submitted that her client has no role to play
in this case, but prayed that no interdictory WP(C) NO. 26235 OF 2021
orders be issued against them since the work is
still in progress.
6. When I consider the afore submissions,
it is clear that there is no dispute as to the
compensation or its disbursement and that all
the parties are ad idem that the said amount
has to be credited to the loan account of the
petitioners. The only issue in the manner is as
to if and how the original document has to be
retained or otherwise by the 4th respondent.
In the afore circumstances, I order this
Writ Petition directing the 4th respondent -
Manager of the HDFC Bank, to produce the
original documents of the property covered by
the acquisition before the jurisdictional CALA,
who will examine the same and then either
return the document to them or retain it if it
is absolutely necessary, on issuance of proper
receipt to them indicating such retention.
The CALA will, thereupon, ensure that the WP(C) NO. 26235 OF 2021
eligible compensation is disbursed to the Bank,
to be credited to the loan account of the
petitioners; and will subsequently, return the
document to the Bank, if it is retained as per
the afore liberty, but never to the petitioners
or to any other person.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE SAS/25/11/2021 WP(C) NO. 26235 OF 2021
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 26235/2021
PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 COPY OF THE NOTICE BEARING NO. LAC 8/21, DATED 16/10/2021 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P2 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 03/11/2021 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P3 COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!