Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 22575 Ker
Judgement Date : 19 November, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 28TH KARTHIKA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 11143 OF 2011
PETITIONERS:
1 SIVADAS @ BALAN,
S/O. SEMANDY, AGED 44 YEARS, RESIDING AT
KULAMANKUZHIKUDI,VALARA.P.O., MANNAMKANDOM VILLAGE,
DEVIKULAM TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
2 SUDEVAN, S/O. VELLAMUTHU,
AGED 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT KULAMANKUZHIKUDI,
VALARA.P.O., MANNAMKANDOM VILLAGE,
DEVIKULAM TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
3 PETER, S/O.CHINNASWAMI, AGED 43 YEARS,
RESIDING AT KULAMANKUZHIKUDI, VALARA.P.O.,
MANNAMKANDOM VILLAGE,
DEVIKULAM TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
4 V.S. MANOJ, S/O.SIVADAS, AGED 35 YEARS
RESIDING AT KULAMANKUZHIKUDI, VALARA.P.O.,
MANNAMKANDOM VILLAGE,
DEVIKULAM TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
5 MANCHANAN, S/O. CHOTTA, AGED 65 YEARS,
RESIDING AT KULAMANKUZHIKUDI, VALARA.P.O.,
MANNAMKANDOM VILLAGE,
DEVIKULAM TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
6 KARTHAN, S/O.YESUMALA, AGED 55 YEARS,
RESIDING AT KULAMANKUZHIKUDI, VALARA.P.O.,
MANNAMKANDOM VILLAGE,
DEVIKULAM TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
7 VELLAMUTHU SO.THAILANAGED 65 YEARS
RESIDING AT KULAMANKUZHIKUDI,VALARA.P.O.,, MANNAMKANDOM
VILLAGE,DEVIKULAM TALUK,IDUKKI DIST.
8 MANOJ.K., S/O.KARTHAN, AGED 28 YEARS,
RESIDING AT KULAMANKUZHIKUDI, VALARA.P.O.,
MANNAMKANDOM VILLAGE,
DEVIKULAM TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
9 JOBBY.N., S/O. NANAPPAN, AGED 32 YEARS,
RESIDING AT KULAMANKUZHIKUDI, VALARA.P.O.,
WP(C) NO.11143/2011
2
MANNAMKANDOM VILLAGE,
DEVIKULAM TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
BY ADV SRI.K.J.GEORGE KUNNUMPURATH
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001.
2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI,
COLLECTORATE, KUYILIMALA, PAINAVU,
IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN - 685 602.
3 THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER,
DEVIKULAM, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN - 685 613.
4 THE FOREST RANGE OFFICER,
NERIYAMANGALAM, RANGE OFFICE, IDUKKI
DISTRICT, PIN - 685 603.
ADV.SRI.T.P.SAJAN, SPECIAL GOVERNMENT
PLEADER (FOREST)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 19.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO.11143/2011
3
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
-------------------------------
W.P.(C)No.11143 of 2011
--------------------------------
Dated this the 19th day of November 2021
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with
following prayers:
"i) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or direction commanding the Respondents to record the rights conferred on the petitioners as per Section 3 of the Scheduled Tribes and other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights Act 2006) and issue necessary papers recording their rights.
ii) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or order or direction, directing the Respondents to remove the jundas put by the 4th respondent from the properties of the petitioners.
iii) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or order directing the Respondents not to make any obstruction while the petitioners make agricultural operations in their holding.
iv) To issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to dispose of Exhibit P-9 Representation within a time limit.
WP(C) NO.11143/2011
v) Issue such of other reliefs which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and just in the interest of justice in the particular facts and circumstances of this case."
2. Today when the matter came up for
consideration, the learned Special Government
Pleader(Forest) submitted that 7 out of 9
petitioners were already given the right
conferred as per Section 3 of the Scheduled
Tribes and other Traditional Forest Dwellers
(Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006.
The learned Government Pleader submitted
that, if there is any further grievance to
the other petitioners, they can approach the
authority concerned with a representation and
the authority concerned will do the needful
in accordance to law.
In the light of the above submission,
this writ petition can be disposed of in the
following manner:
(i) If any of the petitioners have
got any surviving grievance, they can WP(C) NO.11143/2011
approach the competent authority among the
respondents with a representation.
(ii) If such a representation is
received, the competent authority among the
respondents will consider the same and take
appropriate steps in accordance to law.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE DM WP(C) NO.11143/2011
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 11143/2011
PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING TAX REGISTER OF 1993-94 TO 2010-11 OF WARD NO.1 OF ADIMALI GRAMA PANCHAYATH.
EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING TAX EXTRACT FOR 1993-94 TO 2010-11 FOR THE 6TH PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE RATION CARD OF THE 1ST PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE RATION CARD OF THE 2ND PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE RATION CARD OF THE 6TH PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 15/12/1995.
EXHIBIT P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE FOREST RIGHTS COMMITTEE DATED 20.06.2009.
EXHIBIT P8 A TRUE COPY OF THE CLAIM SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION.
EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD.
EXHIBIT P11 TRUE COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD.
EXHIBIT P12 TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD.
//TRUE COPY//
PA TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!