Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 22442 Ker
Judgement Date : 9 November, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHIRCY V.
TUESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 18TH KARTHIKA, 1943
BAIL APPL. NO. 8357 OF 2021
CRIME NO.512/2021 OF KODAKARA POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CRMC 1664/2021 OF COURT OF SESSIONS
THRISSUR
PETITIONER/1ST ACCUSED:
SHYJU @ PALLAN SHYJU
AGED 43 YEARS
S/O.VARGHESE, MACHINGAL HOUSE, PANTHALLOOR DESOM,
NELLAYI VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 305.
BY ADVS.
P.VIJAYA BHANU (SR.)
P.M.RAFIQ
SRUTHY N. BHAT
M.REVIKRISHNAN
AJEESH K.SASI
MITHA SUDHINDRAN
POOJA PANKAJ
RAHUL SUNIL
CIBI THOMAS
RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT AND STATE:
1 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
KODAKARA POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT -680 684.
2 THE STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031.
NOUSHAD.K.A- SR.PP
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
09.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
BAIL APPL. NO. 8357 OF 2021
2
ORDER
Application for regular bail.
2. The petitioner who is the 1st accused in Crime
No.512/2021 of Kodakara Police Station, Thrissur District
registered for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147,
148, 341, 323, 324, 294(b), 506(ii), 427 and 308 r/w Section 149
of the Indian Penal Code, has preferred this application for his
release on bail.
3. The petitioner has been in custody since 08.10.2021.
4. The prosecution allegation is that on 08.10.2021, the
petitioner along with his friends have reached at Nellai Junction as
invited by the defacto complainant for a settlement talk. But the
defacto complainant and his friends were attacked by this petitioner
and the other accused and caused fatal injuries. They have also
vandalized their vehicle and thereby committed the aforesaid
offences.
5. The learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner
has submitted that, though there is an allegation that the defacto
complainant and his friends have sustained injuries, there is
absolutely no document to show that any of them have sustained
any injuries from this petitioner and the other accused. But he is BAIL APPL. NO. 8357 OF 2021
undergoing incarceration since the date of his arrest and hence this
application.
6. This application is opposed by the learned Public
Prosecutor mainly on the allegation that he is having criminal
antecedents as he is involved in 16 criminal cases.
7. Annexure-IV is the wound certificate of this petitioner,
who had undergone treatment in Santhi Hospital, Kodakara on the
very same day of the incident i.e. on 08.10.2021. This wound
certificate would reveal that he has sustained grievous injuries in
the attack by the defacto complainant and his friends. Since there
is no wound certificate available in this case to show that the
defacto complainant and his friends have sustained injuries in the
attack by this petitioner as well the other accused persons, I think
that further detention may not be required in this case. As
submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor the investigation in both
the cases (Crime No.513/2021) are going on smoothly, I think that
his further detention may not be required for the investigating
agency to proceed with the investigation. Moreover it is submitted
by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner that, though 16
cases have been registered against this petitioner, in 14 cases, he
had already been acquitted, as per the information given by the BAIL APPL. NO. 8357 OF 2021
wife of the petitioner. Therefore, I am inclined to release this
petitioner also on bail subject to the following conditions:
(i) The petitioner shall be released on bail on his
executing a bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees
One Lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like
sum each to the satisfaction of the court having
jurisdiction.
(ii) The petitioner shall appear before Investigating
Officer for interrogation as and when required by him,
in writing.
(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly, make
any inducement, threat or promise to any person
acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade
him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any
police officer or tamper with the evidence.
(iv) The petitioner shall not commit any offence while
on bail.
In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned
Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with the
law.
Sd/-
SHIRCY V.
JUDGE mpm
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!