Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 22411 Ker
Judgement Date : 9 November, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
TUESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 18TH KARTHIKA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 24450 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
LAIQUE.P.P,
AGED 52 YEARS,
S/O. P.P MUHAMMED,
BSNL CONTRACTOR,
PUTHUKAYIL PUTHIYA MALIYEKKAL HOUSE,
B.P ANGADI P.O,
TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT
BY ADV C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL
RESPONDENTS:
1 BHARATH SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED,
(GOVERNMENT OF INDIA UNDERTAKING)
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR,
BSNL CORPORATE OFFICE,
HARISH CHANDRA MATHUR LANE,
JANPATH, NEW DELHI 110 001
2 THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER,
BHARATH SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED,
PMG JUNCTION,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN 695 001
3 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ©,
BSNL CIVIL DIVISION NO.II,
ERNAKULAM , PIN 682 016
SRI.MATHEWS K PHILIP, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
09.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.24450/2021
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 9th day of November, 2021
The petitioner, who is a BSNL Contractor, has
approached this Court seeking to direct the respondents to
pay the amount due on the bills submitted by the petitioner in
respect of the works executed pursuant to Exts.P1 to P7
proceedings, within a time stipulated by this Court.
2. The petitioner states that he is a BSNL contractor
and was awarded with 7 works as per Exts.P1 to P7. The
petitioner claims that he has completed the work within the
stipulated time to the satisfaction of the respondents. The 3 rd
respondent has forwarded the bill of the petitioner to the 2 nd
respondent for processing and payment. As no amount is
paid, the petitioner submitted Ext.P8 representation to the 2 nd
respondent.
WP(C).No.24450/2021
3. The learned Standing Counsel representing the
respondents pointed out that Ext.P8 representation preferred
by the petitioner is pending consideration and the respondents
will be able to take a decision on the representation within a
time frame. In such circumstances, this Court is of the view
that no adjudication on the issues involved is necessary in this
writ petition at this stage as the petitioner's representation is
pending consideration before the authorities.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing
the 2nd respondent or any other authorised officer under the 2 nd
respondent, to consider Ext.P8 representation filed by the
petitioner and pass appropriate orders thereon, within a period
of six weeks.
Sd/-
N. NAGARESH JUDGE SR WP(C).No.24450/2021
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 24450/2021
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO.
C-101/EE-BSNL--CD-II/EKM/2018-19/435 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 27- 09-2018 Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO.
C-101/EE-BSNL-CD-II/EKM/2018-19/434 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DAT3ED 27- 09-2018 Exhibit P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO.
C-101/EE-CD-II/EKM/BSNL/2018-60 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 7-2-2018 Exhibit P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO.
C-101/EE/BSNL-CD-II/EKM/2018-19/400 ISSSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 5- 09-2018 Exhibit P5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO.
C-101/EE-CD-II/EKM/BSNL/2018/61 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 7-2-2018 Exhibit P6 THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO.
C-101/EE-BSNL-CD-II/EKM/2018-19/401 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 5- 09-2018 Exhibit P7 THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO.
C-101/EE-CD-II/EKM/BSNL/2018/62 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 7-2-2018 Exhibit P8 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 14-10-2021
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!