Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 22021 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 November, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 12TH KARTHIKA, 1943
RP NO. 742 OF 2021
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 14.09.2021 IN WA 504/2021 OF HIGH
COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM
REVIEW PETITIONER/APPELLANT:
NISHA R.
AGED 40 YEARS
W/O.SHANIL S., THODIYIL VEEDU, THRIVENI JUNCTION,
VALATHUNGAL P.O., THATTAMALA, KOLLAM - 691 018.
BY ADVS.
LIJU.V.STEPHEN
INDU SUSAN JACOB
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
2 DIRECTORATE OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION
NEAR FIRE STATION, PALACE ROAD, VAYASKKARAKKUNNU,
VAYASAKKARA, KOTTAYAM - 686 001.
3 UNIVERSITY OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PALAYAM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 034.
4 THE VICE CHANCELLOR
UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -
695 034.
5 THE UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION (UGC)
BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG, NEW DELHI - 110 002,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
:2:
R.P.No.742 of 2021
in
W.A.No.504 of 2021
6 TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, NANTHANCODE,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 034.
7 SREE AYYAPPA COLLEGE
ERAMALLIKKARA, CHENGANNUR - 689 109, REPRESENTED BY
ITS PRINCIPAL.
8 SREELAKSHMI A.N.
AGED 30 YEARS
D/O.S.NASIM, VADASSERL, PURAMATTOM P.O.,
THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT - 689 543.
(ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER
SCIENCE, SREE AYYAPPA COLLEGE, ERAMALLIKARA,
CHENGANNUR).
9 DR.SREERAJ M.
AGED 38 YEARS
S/O.MADHAVANKUTTY K., RESIDING AT SREEMADHAVAM,
AMBALAPUZHA P.O., AMBALAPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT,
PIN - 688 561.
BY ADV. SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.A.J.VARGHESE
BY ADV.SRI.THOMAS ABRAHAM, SC
BY ADV.SRI.G.BIJU,SC
BY ADV.SRI.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY, CGC
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
03.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
:3:
R.P.No.742 of 2021
in
W.A.No.504 of 2021
ORDER
A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar, J.
On a perusal of the averments in the Review Petition, we are of
the view that no grounds have been made out for a review of the
impugned judgment. A Review Petition cannot be a ruse for re-arguing
the Writ Appeal on merits. The Review Petition fails and is accordingly
dismissed.
Sd/-
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE
Sd/-
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
JUDGE
mns
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!