Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sulfeekarali vs The State Of Kerala
2021 Latest Caselaw 21871 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 21871 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 November, 2021

Kerala High Court
Sulfeekarali vs The State Of Kerala on 3 November, 2021
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                           PRESENT
           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021/12TH KARTHIKA, 1943
                 WP(C) NO. 23223 OF 2021
PETITIONERS:

    1    SULFEEKERALI,
         AGED 41 YEARS,
         S/O. HASSAIN E.P.,
         PUTHENPEEDIKA HOUSE,
         ANCHACHAVADI P.O.,
         KALIKAVU, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

    2    ANEES BABU,
         AGED 39 YEARS,
         S/O. MOIDEEN HAJI,
         PAKIDEERI HOUSE,
         KALIKAVU, MALAPPURAM.

    3    RAMSHAD P.,
         AGED 27 YEARS,
         S/O. ALAVI, POOVATHINGAL HOUSE,
         VELLAYOOR P.O.,
         KALIKAVU, MALAPPURAM.

         BY ADV K.RAKESH


RESPONDENTS:

    1    THE STATE OF KERALA,
         REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
         DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS,
         SECRETARIAT, PALAYAM,
         TRIVANDRUM, PIN - 695 001.

    2    THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH,
         OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH,
         CIVIL STATION,
         UP-HILL, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676505.

    3    THE KALIKAVU GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
         REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
         KALIKAVU P. O.,
         MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676 525.
 WP(C) No.23223/2021
                            :2 :


     4     THE SECRETARY,
           KALIKAVU PANCHAYATH,
           KALIKAVU P.O.,
           MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676 525.

     5     THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
           LSGD SECTION, KALIKAVU GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
           KALIKAVU P. O.,
           MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676 525.

           BY ADV SHRI.EBIN MATHEW, SC, KALIKAVU GRAMA
           PANCHAYAT

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP           FOR
ADMISSION ON 03.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME           DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) No.23223/2021
                                     :3 :




                           JUDGMENT

~~~~~~~~~

Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2021

The petitioners, who are Contractors who

participated in the tender proceedings conducted by the 5 th

respondent, are before this Court seeking to direct

respondents 3 to 5 to extend the benefit of Ext.P14

Government Order in favour of the petitioners and to execute

the agreement in tune with the stipulations in Ext.P14.

2. Ext.P14 Government Order dated 07.01.2021

extends three special benefits to the Contractors which are as

follows:-

(1) Performance Security / Security Deposit to be submitted at the time of executing the agreement is reduced from the existing rate of 5% to 3% of the contract amount.

(2) Correspondingly Bid Security / Earnest Money Deposit is reduced from 2.5% to 1.5% of the estimated amount.

(3) Additional Performance Guarantee is waived for the low quoted items on the condition that the bidder shall furnish an undertaking to execute all low quoted items in full as per contract terms.

WP(C) No.23223/2021

3. The case of the petitioners is that the petitioners

may be permitted to execute agreements in respect of the

works bid by them without giving Additional Performance

Guarantee, on the petitioners undertaking to execute the low

quoted items in full as per contract terms. The learned

counsel for the petitioners submitted that though Ext.P14 is an

order issued by the Government Finance (Industries and

Public works-B) Department, the 3rd respondent-Panchayat is

bound by Ext.P14 and is compellable to extend the benefits

granted by the Government, to the petitioners who are

Contractors engaged by the Panchayat.

4. The learned Standing Counsel for the 3 rd

respondent-Panchayat filed a statement on behalf of

respondents 3 to 5. In the statement, it has been disclosed

that the petitioners in the previous financial years undertook

certain contract works and they slipped over 12 contracts and

abandoned altogether 7 other contracts. When the petitioners

are having the habit of violating their contract terms, they

cannot seek for waiver on the Additional Performance WP(C) No.23223/2021

Guarantee fixed in Ext.P14.

5. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners

and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

6. At the time of hearing, the learned Standing

Counsel for the 3rd respondent submitted that the benefit as

regards Performance Security / Security Deposit to be

submitted at the time of executing the agreement is reduced

from the existing rate of 5% to 3% of the contract amount.

The said benefit has already been extended to the petitioners.

Furthermore, the Standing Counsel submitted that the benefit

of reduction of corresponding Bid Security from 2.5% to 1.5%

of the estimated amount will be given to all Contractors.

7. Therefore, the only issue remaining is relating to

waiver of Additional Performance Guarantee. But, taking into

consideration the fact that the petitioners have slipped over 12

contracts and abandoned 7 works, this Court is of the opinion

that the Panchayat is justified in insisting that the petitioners

should provide Additional Performance Guarantee. This being

an arrangement of contractual nature, the 3 rd respondent will WP(C) No.23223/2021

be fully justified in insisting for Additional Performance

Guarantee in the facts of the case. Therefore, this Court is of

the considered opinion that the petitioners cannot as of right

claim waiver of Additional Performance Guarantee.

In such circumstances, the writ petition is disposed

of recording the submissions made as above by the Standing

Counsel for the 3rd respondent as regards the conditions at

paragraph 4(1) and 4(2) of Ext.P14. As the last date for

executing agreement is today and since the petitioners did not

execute agreements in view of the pendency of this writ

petition, respondents 3 to 5 are directed to permit the

petitioners to execute the requisite agreement at the latest by

5 p.m. on 05.11.2021.

Sd/-

N. NAGARESH, JUDGE

aks/03.11.2021 WP(C) No.23223/2021

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 23223/2021

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 21.10.2021 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST PETITIONER AS NO.138/21-22 AE/LID&EW/GEN, INFORMING OF HIS SELECTION.

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 21.10.2021 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST PETITIONER AS NO.186/21-22 AE/LID&EW/GEN, INFORMING OF HIS SELECTION.

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 21.10.2021 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST PETITIONER AS NO.142/21-22 AE/LID&EW/GEN, INFORMING OF HIS SELECTION.

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 21.10.2021 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST PETITIONER AS NO.188/21-22 AE/LID&EW/GEN, INFORMING OF HIS SELECTION.

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 21.10.2021 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND PETITIONER AS NO.177/21-22 AE/LID&EW/GEN, INFORMING OF HIS SELECTION.

Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 21.10.2021 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND PETITIONER AS NO.175/21-22 AE/LID&EW/GEN, INFORMING OF HIS SELECTION.

Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 21.10.2021 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND PETITIONER AS NO.80/21-22 AE/LID&EW/GEN, INFORMING OF HIS SELECTION.

Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 21.10.2021 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND PETITIONER AS NO.74/21-22 AE/LID&EW/GEN, INFORMING OF HIS SELECTION.

WP(C) No.23223/2021

Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 21.10.2021 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND PETITIONER AS NO.97/21-22 AE/LID&EW/GEN, INFORMING OF HIS SELECTION.

Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 21.10.2021 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD PETITIONER AS NO.114/21-22 AE/LID&EW/GEN, INFORMING OF HIS SELECTION.

Exhibit P11 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 21.10.2021 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD PETITIONER AS NO.143/21-22 AE/LID&EW/GEN, INFORMING OF HIS SELECTION.

Exhibit P12 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 21.10.2021 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD PETITIONER AS NO.173/21-22 AE/LID&EW/GEN, INFORMING OF HIS SELECTION.

Exhibit P13 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 21.10.2021 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD PETITIONER AS NO.179/21-22 AE/LID&EW/GEN, INFORMING OF HIS SELECTION.

Exhibit P14 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER AS G.O.(P) NO.7/2021/FIN DATED 7.1.2021 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:

ANNEXURE R3(a) TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE TENDER NOTICE DATED 23.09.2021 ANNEXURE R3(b) DECISION OF THE PANCHAYATH DATED 18.10.2021 ANNEXURE R3(c) DECISION OF THE PANCHAYATH DATED 29.10.2021

SR

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter