Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shajahan Kassim vs Union Of India
2021 Latest Caselaw 21847 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 21847 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 November, 2021

Kerala High Court
Shajahan Kassim vs Union Of India on 3 November, 2021
            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT

        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021/12TH KARTHIKA, 1943

                     WP(C) NO. 14378 OF 2021

PETITIONER:

            SHAJAHAN KASSIM
            AGED 51 YEARS,S/O. KASSIM,
            NAVAS MANZIL,
            THATHAMPALLY P.O, INDIRA JUNCTION,
            ZILLA COURT WARD, ALAPPUZHA,
            KERALA 688 013
            BY ADV. PRAISHEEL PRAKASAM


RESPONDENTS:

    1       UNION OF INDIA
            REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF
            INDIA, MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS,
            NEW DELHI 110 001
    2       PASSPORT OFFICER
            REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICE,
            PANAMPILLY NAGAR,
            ERNAKULAM, KOCHI 682 015
    3       PASSPORT OFFICER
            ALLAPUZHA PASSPORT SEVA KENDRA,
            ALLEPPY AVENUE CENTER,
            BEACH ROAD, ALAPPUZHA 688 003
            BY ADV SHRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR, ASG OF INDIA



     THIS     WRIT   PETITION    (CIVIL)     HAVING    COME    UP    FOR
ADMISSION     ON   03.11.2021,    THE     COURT   ON   THE    SAME   DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C) No.14378/21                  -:2:-




                     BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
                       ------------------------------------
                        W.P.(C) No.14378 of 2021
                      --------------------------------------
                 Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2021

                                JUDGMENT

Petitioner seeks correction of date of birth in his passport. Petitioner

alleges that though by Ext.P7 application he applied to the second

respondent to correct his date of birth from 20.02.1962 to 01.06.1969,

respondents have not taken a decision thereon and the delay is causing

prejudice to the petitioner.

2. Petitioner is the holder of an Indian passport beaning

No.J8560151 which was issued on 31.10.2011. Petitioner further pleads

that, the date of birth shown in the passport is incorrect and that his place

of birth as well as the date of birth are contrary to the actual date of birth

and place of birth. He has produced the birth certificate, the Aadhar card

and his PAN card, wherein the date of birth is shown as 01.06.1969 and

place of birth as Avalookkunnu, Alleppy, while in the existing passport, the

date of birth is shown as 20.02.1962 and place of birth as Tirunelveli, Tamil

Nadu. Petitioner seeks directions for correction of his date of birth and

place of birth and filed Ext.P7 application for renewal of his passport.

3. A statement has been filed on behalf of respondents 1 to 3

wherein it is stated that the existing passport issued to the petitioner is

only a continuation of his earlier passports and further that, the first

passport was issued to the petitioner in 1987. Respondents have further

averred that petitioner had been using his passport for the last 39 years

and interference with his date of birth, as entered in the existing passport

cannot be done lightly, especially since, the same will have far reaching

implications. The respondents have also referred to the fact that

documents produced by the petitioner for the entries as it presently exists

in the passport, would obviously have been submitted by the petitioner

and he cannot at this belated stage be permitted to correct those entries

for the mere asking that too on the basis of new documents.

4. I have heard Adv.Praisheel Prakasam., learned counsel for the

petitioner as well as Adv.P.Vijayakumar, learned Assistant Solicitor General

of India for the respondents.

5. Petitioner's existing passport is admittedly not his first passport.

As pleaded by the respondents, his first passport was issued 34 years

back, in 1987. Petitioner has admitted in his pleadings that he was

working abroad and had travelled abroad using all the earlier passports

issued to him. Visa's were obtained by the petitioner for travelling abroad

wherein the endorsement relating to his date of birth and place of birth

would have formed part of the records of the countries he travelled.

6. A passport is a solemn document, as observed by this Court in

Union of India v. Sunil Kumar (2015 (3) KLT 501) Vasu Sasi v. Union

of India and Others (2020 (4) KHC 405). Every passport is issued and

the particulars entered by referring to the documents submitted by the

applicant for such passports. The documents required to be submitted

obviously include certificates to prove the date of birth and other

documents of identification. Thus when petitioner obtained his initial

passport 34 years back, some documents would have been submitted by

the petitioner to prove his date and place of birth. There is no mention in

the writ petition as to which were those documents submitted by the

petitioner for obtaining the present entries in his passport. In the absence

of any reference to such documents, it is not proper for this Court, in

exercise of its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India to direct the passport issuing authority to rely upon

the documents now submitted by the petitioner for carrying out

corrections.

7. It would be apposite to notice that the documents of identity like

the birth certificate, Aadhar card and PAN card submitted by the petitioner

for the correction now sought for, are all documents of recent origin. The

passport issuing authority cannot determine the veracity of date of birth

now seen in the certificates produced, since such a power of

determination on the veracity of the contents of documents is not vested

with the said statutory authority.

8. Further, no explanation of any nature is forthcoming from the

petitioner to justify such a highly belated application for correction of the

date and place of birth. This Court cannot accept that the petitioner was

unaware about the entries regarding date and place of birth in his passport

for the last three decades. A liberal approach in correcting the date and

place of birth in the passport may have far reaching consequences. A

passport is treated as a document of identity, especially while travelling

abroad and for obtaining employment abroad. The issuance of a passport

to the citizen of a country is based upon an International Civil Aviation

Agreement of 1944, to which India is a signatory. The International Civil

Aviation Organization (ICAO) has enacted regulations enabling a Traveller

Identification Programme (TRIP). The aforesaid programme emphasis

integrity of civil rights that issued identity documents which formed the

basis for issuance of passport. A liberal correction of important document

like passport will erode the sanctity and integrity of the Indian Passport

issuance system, amongst the international community. Such a process

cannot be permitted to be done with the stroke of a pen, that too, very

lightly.

9. There is yet another significant impact of correction of date of

birth especially in the nature of one sought for in this writ petition.

Petitioner would have obtained employment abroad utilizing the date of

birth mentioned in the passport. The age of retirement, pensionary

benefits from abroad, if eligible and other significant rights of the said

individual would be flowing from the date of birth stipulated in the passport.

The correction of date of birth in the passport will have a far reaching

impact upon the employment of not only the petitioner but even of other

persons, who could be prejudiced. In such a view of the matter dealing

with a correction of date of birth in a passport ought to be carried with

circumspection and caution. A statutory authority vested with the powers

for correcting the date of birth, that too, in a solemn document like the

passport, ought to exercise such a power without any dictate from a Court

much less a constitutional court, unless exceptional circumstances

warrant.

10. In view of the above, I find no reason to direct the respondents

to correct the date of birth in the passport of the petitioner. However since

Ext.P7 application has been submitted by the petitioner, there is no reason

to assume that a decision will not be taken by the respondents pursuant to

such application.

With the above observations, I refuse to exercise the discretion

under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and dismiss this writ petition.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE vps

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 14378/2021

PETITIONER'S/S' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF PASSPORT OF PETITIONER WHICH IS ISSUED ON 31-11-2011 EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE DATED 23-03-2021 ISSUED BY ALAPPUZHA MUNICIPALITY EXHIBIT P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE AADHAR CARD DATED 19-04-2021 EXHIBIT P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE SSLC BOOK EXHIBIT P5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE PAN CARD NO.

                         CKQPK68370
EXHIBIT P6               THE TRUE COPY OF      THE    DRIVING   LICENSE
                         DATED 17-07-1987
EXHIBIT P7               THE TRUE COPY OF ONLINE APPLICATION
                         RECEIPT DATED 30-06-2021 WITH REFERENCE
                         NO 21-1003652201
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter