Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 21773 Ker
Judgement Date : 2 November, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
TUESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 11TH KARTHIKA, 1943
W.P.(C) NO.28273 OF 2013
PETITIONER:
XAVIER VARKEY,
S/O.VARKEY,
KUNNATHETTU HOUSE,
AYARKUNNAM VILLAGE,
KOTTAYAM TALUK AND DISTRICT.
BY ADV SRI.P.C.HARIDAS
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY,
GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
KOTTAYAM.
3 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFIER,
KOTTAYAM
4 THE TAHSILDAR,
TALUK OFFICE, KOTTAYAM.
5 AYARKUNNAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
AYARKUNNAM, KOTTAYAM-686 564
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
6 YAMUNA E.R.,
TALUK SURVEYOR,
TALUK OFFICE, KOTTAYAM.
7 JOSE MATHEW,
KUDAKASSERIL,
MUTTAMBALAM VILLAGE, COLLECTORATE P.O.,
KOTTAYAM.
W.P.(C) NO.28273 OF 2013
-2-
8 JOHN JOSEPH,
KUDAKASSERIL,
MUTTAMBALAM VILLAGE,
COLLECTORATE P.O., KOTTAYAM.
9 BENNY THOMAS,
MAMPUZHACKAL TRADERS,
AYARKUNNAM P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 564.
10 ITTIAVIRAH JOSEPH,
CHENNADU TAIKKOTTATHIL KIZHAKKETHIL,
AYARKUNNAM P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 564.
( ADDRESS OF R10 IS CORRECTED AS 'JOSEPH,
S/O.VALIYACHERINATTU CHACKO, THAIKKOOTTOM,
AMAYANNOOR P.O.', AS PER ORDER DATED 13-06-2014
IN I.A.NO.827/14).
11 ITTIAVIRAH VARKEY,
CHENNADU, AYARKUNNAM P.O.,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 564.
12 GEORGE JOSEPH
THOPPIL, AYARKUNNAM P.O.,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 564.
BY ADVS.
GOVERNMENT PLEADER
SRI.AUGUSTINE JOSEPH
SMT.BHAVANA VELAYUDHAN
SRI.JOHN JOSEPH VETTIKAD
SRI.P.J.JOSEPH PANIKKASSERY
SRI.K.P.JUSTINE KARIPAT
SRI.K.S.ROCKEY
SRI.S.SANAL KUMAR
SMT.T.J.SEEMA
SRI.TONY AUGUSTINE
SMT.RASHMI.K.M, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 02.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) NO.28273 OF 2013
-3-
JUDGMENT
The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner
has already approached the civil court and the petitioner may be
allowed to raise all the contentions before the civil court.
Therefore, this writ petition is closed, granting liberty to the
petitioner to raise all the contentions in the writ petition before
the appropriate court, in accordance with law.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE bpr W.P.(C) NO.28273 OF 2013
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1(3 IN TRUE COPIES OF TAX RECIPTS ISSUED TO THE NUMBERS) PETITIONER AND HIS WIFE.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY THE ROUGH SKETCH.
EXHIBIT P3(3 IN PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROPERTY OF THE NUMBERS) PETITIONER EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY THE PETITION DATED 27/6/2013
SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY THE LETTER DATED 29/6/2013 OF THE AGRICULTRAL OFFICER, AYARKUNNAM.
EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY THE REPROT DATED 9/7/2013 OF THE VILLAGE OFFICER, AYARKUNNAM.
EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY THE ORDER DATED 4/10/2013 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY THE PETITION DATED 21/10/2013 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P9 HIBIT P9TRUE COPY THE REPORT AND PLAN DATED 26/9/2013 OF THE 6TH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P10 HIBIT P10TRUE COPY THE REPORT DATED 30/9/2013 OF THE ADDL. TAHSILDAR, KOTTAYAM.
EXHIBIT P11 TRUE COPY THE PAPER REPORT IN JANMABHOOMI DAILY DATED 11/10/2013.
EXHIBIT P12 TRUE COPY THE LETTER DATED 12/9/2013 OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!