Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jyothy V Baby vs State Of Kerala
2021 Latest Caselaw 12641 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12641 Ker
Judgement Date : 31 May, 2021

Kerala High Court
Jyothy V Baby vs State Of Kerala on 31 May, 2021
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                            PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
    MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MAY 2021/10TH JYAISHTA, 1943
                    WP(C) NO. 27725 OF 2020


PETITIONER:
0



          JYOTHY V. BABY, AGED 35, ENGINEER,
          W/O.CIBU MATHEW, VARIKKATHUSSERIL HOUSE,
          KOZHIMALA P.O., ERAVIPEROOR VILLAGE,
          THIRUVALLA TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT,
          CURRENTLY RESIDING AT 9775 CREEKFRONT RD,
          APARTMENT 1703, JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA-32256,
          USA, REPRESENTED BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY
          HOLDER AND FATHER BABY JACOB, AGED 68,
          S/O.LATE V.C.JACOB, VARIKKATHUSSERIL HOUSE,
          KOZHIMALA P.O., ERAVIPEROOR VILLAGE,
          THIRUVALLA TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.

          BY ADVS.
          P.HARIDAS
          SRI.R.B.BALACHANDRAN
          SRI.RENJI GEORGE CHERIAN
          SRI.P.C.SHIJIN
          SRI.RISHIKESH HARIDAS
          SRI.BIJU HARIHARAN


RESPONDENTS:

    1     STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY
          ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF
          LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT, STATE SECRETARIAT,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001.

    2     REGISTRAR OF BIRTHS & DEATHS(SECRETARY),
          THALAVADY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KUTTANADU TALUK,
          ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN-689 571.

          BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.M. JASMIN

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP             FOR
ADMISSION ON 31.05.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME             DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) No.27725/2020
                                   :2 :




                          JUDGMENT

~~~~~~~~~

Dated this the 31st day of May, 2021

The petitioner states that she is a non-resident

Indian now working in the United States of America. She was

born in Kuttanad Taluk in Alappuzha District on 02.05.1985.

However, as disclosed from Ext.P1 Birth Certificate, in the

Register of Births, the petitioner's name "Jyothy V. Baby" was

shown as "Jyothy V. Babay" and the date of birth was

erroneously recorded as "02.07.1985". The name of the

mother was recorded as "Soosamma", instead of "Susamma

Baby". The house name was also wrongly recorded as

"Angilimoottil", instead of "Anjilimoottil".

2. The petitioner would state that the said entries in

the Birth Register were clerical errors and the date of birth,

mother's name and house name were correctly recorded in all

other documents namely, SSLC, Passport, Marriage WP(C) No.27725/2020

Certificate and Aadhaar as can be seen from Exts.P2 to P5.

The petitioner filed an application for correction of particulars

in Birth Register invoking Section 15 of the Registration of

Births and Deaths Act, 1969 read with Rule 11 of the Kerala

Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 1999.

3. However, the petitioner was served with Ext.P7

intimation of the Sub Registrar of Births and Deaths,

Thalavady Grama Panchayat requiring the petitioner to

produce Affidavit, Recognised School Certificate, Documents

in proof of name and address of mother and the original of

Birth Certificate already issued, and if the same is lost, an

affidavit to that effect on stamp paper of ₹100/-. The 2 nd

respondent further informed that under the existing law,

correction of date of birth is impermissible.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that

Ext.P6 application of the petitioner is supported by

Declarations given by two neighbouring citizens and correction

in Register of Births can be effected based on these

Declarations in the light of the judgments of this Court in The WP(C) No.27725/2020

Registrar of Births and Deaths v. Thomas Jacob [2011 (3)

KLT 461] and in Sajil v. State of Kerala [2019 (1) KLT 607].

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of

the extreme urgency in the matter, the 2 nd respondent may be

directed to reconsider the application and process the same in

the light of the aforesaid judgments of this Court.

5. In view of the nature of relief being granted in this

writ petition, notice to the 2nd respondent is dispensed with.

6. This Court in the judgment in The Registrar of

Births and Deaths v. Thomas Jacob (supra) has held that if

it is proved to the satisfaction of the Registrar that any entry of

a birth or death in any Register kept by him under the Act is

erroneous in form or substances, he may subject to such rules

as may be made by the State Government with respect to

conditions on which and the circumstances in which such

entries may be corrected or cancelled, correct the error or

cancel the entry by suitable entry in the margin, and shall sign

the marginal entry and add thereto the date of correction or

cancellation. Rule 11 provides that if a clerical or formal error WP(C) No.27725/2020

made in the register is either reported or noticed by the

Registrar, he shall enquire into the matter and if he is satisfied

that any error has been made, he shall correct the error in the

manner as provided therein. Sub-rule (2) provides that if any

person asserts that any entry in the register of births and

deaths is erroneous in substance, the Registrar may correct

the entry in the manner as prescribed under Section 15 of the

Act upon production by that person a declaration setting forth

the nature of the error and true facts of the case made by two

credible persons having knowledge of the facts of the case.

7. In view of the afore judgment, correction of date of

birth in the Birth Register is permissible and the Registrar has

power to make such correction.

In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of

directing the 2nd respondent to reconsider Ext.P6 application

submitted by the petitioner for correction of entries in the Birth

Register including the entry as to Date of Birth in the light of

the judgment of this Court in The Registrar of Births and

Deaths v. Thomas Jacob (supra) within a period of three WP(C) No.27725/2020

weeks. To enable the 2nd respondent to consider the

application as directed above, Ext.P7 communication is set

aside. The petitioner shall serve a copy of the judgment of

this Court reported in The Registrar of Births and Deaths v.

Thomas Jacob [2011 (3) KLT 461] and certified copy of this

judgment, on the 2nd respondent for compliance.

Sd/-

N. NAGARESH, JUDGE

aks/31.05.2021 WP(C) No.27725/2020

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 27725/2020

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE OF THE PETITIONER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 29.09.2020.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE SECONDARY SCHOOL LEAVING CERTIFICATE (SSLC) DATD 04.04.2000.

EXHIBIT P3            TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE
                      PASSPORT    OF    THE   PETITIONER    DATED
                      10.10.2014.
EXHIBIT P4            TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF MARRIAGE
                      OF THE PETITIONER DATED 17.12.2011.
EXHIBIT P5            TRUE   COPY    OF  THE   AADHAAR   OF   THE
                      PETITIONER DATED 09.10.2013.
EXHIBIT P6            TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY
                      THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT
                      DATED    03.12.2020    ALONG    WITH    THE
                      DECLARATION.
EXHIBIT P7            TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE 2ND
                      RESPONDENT    TO   THE  PETITIONER    DATED
                      10/1/2021
ncd
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter