Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shameer.P.S vs Corporation Of Kochi
2021 Latest Caselaw 12578 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12578 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 May, 2021

Kerala High Court
Shameer.P.S vs Corporation Of Kochi on 27 May, 2021
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                       PRESENT
                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
                                          &
                     THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.R.ANITHA
           THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2021 / 6TH JYAISHTA, 1943
                               WA NO. 736 OF 2021
    AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGEMENT IN WP(C) 11172/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF
                                KERALA, ERNAKULAM
APPELLANT:

                  THE CHAIRMAN
0




                  THYKKATTU DEVASWOM TRUST, VENNALA P.O., KOCHI,
                  REPRESENTED BY T.G.N. KUMAR, RESIDING AT 33/3004,
                  VENNALA P.O., KOCHI-682 028
                  BY ADV P.S.BIJU


RESPONDENTS:

       1          SHAMEER.P.S
                  AGED 35 YEARS
                  S/O. SHABA, MADAPPATT HOUSE, EROOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT,
                  PIN-682 306.
       2          CORPORATION OF KOCHI
                  PARK AVENUE ROAD, MARINE DRIVE, KOCHI, KERALA-682 011,
                  REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
       3          THE SECRETARY
                  KOCHI CORPORATION, PARK AVENUE ROAD, MARINE DRIVE,
                  KOCHI-682 011.
       4          THE HEALTH OFFICER
                  CORPORATION OF KOCHI, PARK AVENUE ROAD, MARINE DRIVE,
                  KOCHI-682 011.
                  BY ADVS.
                  K.MOHANAKANNAN
                  P.S.BIJU


THIS       WRIT   PETITION   (CIVIL)   HAVING    COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
27.05.2021, ALONG WITH WP(C).9984/2020, 9783/2021 AND CONNECTED
CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.A No.736/2021 and con. cases
                                       - 2 -



                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                       PRESENT
                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
                                          &
                     THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.R.ANITHA
           THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2021 / 6TH JYAISHTA, 1943
                             WP(C) NO. 9984 OF 2020
PETITIONER:

                  SHAMEER.P.S.,AGED 35 YEARS
0




                  S/O.SHABA, MADAPPATT HOUSE, EROOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
                  BY ADV K.MOHANAKANNAN


RESPONDENTS:

       1          CORPORATION OF KOCHI, PARK AVENUE ROAD, MARINE DRIVE,
                  KOCHI, KERALA-682011, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
       2          THE SECRETARY,KOCHI CORPORATION, PARK AVENUE ROAD,
                  MARINE DRIVE, KOCHI-682011.
       3          THE HEALTH OFFICER,CORPORATION OF KOCHI, PARK AVENUE
                  ROAD, MARINE DRIVE, KOCHI, KERALA-682011.
       4          ADDL.R4.THE CHAIRMAN,THYKKATU DEVASWOM TRUST, VENNALA
                  P.O., KOCHI - 682 028. REPRESENTED BY T.G.N.KUMAR.

                  ADDITIONAL RESPONDENT IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED
                  11.06.2020 IN I.A.NO.1/2020 IN WP(C).
                  BY ADVS.
                  SRI.K.ANAND, SC, COCHIN CORPN.
                  P.S.BIJU
                  SMT.N.N.GIRIJA


THIS       WRIT   PETITION   (CIVIL)   HAVING    COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
27.05.2021, ALONG WITH WA.736/2021 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT
ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.A No.736/2021 and con. cases
                                       - 3 -



                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                       PRESENT
                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
                                          &
                     THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.R.ANITHA
           THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2021 / 6TH JYAISHTA, 1943
                             WP(C) NO. 9783 OF 2021
PETITIONER:

                  THE CHAIRMAN, THYKKATTU DEVASWOM TRUST
0




                  VENNALA P.O., KOCHI - 682 028.
                  BY ADV P.S.BIJU


RESPONDENTS:

       1          THE SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF KOCHI
                  ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682 011.
       2          THE HEALTH OFFICER
                  COOPERATION OF KOCHI, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682 011.
       3          THE HEALTH INSPECTOR
                  CORPORATION OF KOCHI, EDAPPALLY ZONE, KOCHI - 682 011.
       4          THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
                  PALARIVATTOM POLICE STATION, KOCHI - 682 025.
       5          SHAMEER P.S. FAMILY FRUITS, FISH AND CHICKEN, THURUTHEL
                  ROAD, VENNALA P.O., KOCHI - 682 028.
                  BY ADV SHRI.K.JANARDHANA SHENOY, SC, KOCHI MUNICIPAL
                  CORPORATION


THIS       WRIT   PETITION   (CIVIL)   HAVING    COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
27.05.2021, ALONG WITH WA.736/2021 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT
ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.A No.736/2021 and con. cases
                                       - 4 -



                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                       PRESENT
                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
                                          &
                     THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.R.ANITHA
           THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2021 / 6TH JYAISHTA, 1943
                             WP(C) NO. 11172 OF 2021
PETITIONER:

                  SHAMEER P.S.AGED 35 YEARS
0




                  S/O. SHABA, MADAPPATT HOUSE, EROOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
                  BY ADVS.
                  K.MOHANAKANNAN
                  SMT.T.V.NEEMA


RESPONDENTS:

       1          CORPORATION OF KOCHI, PARK AVENUE ROAD, MARINE DRIVE,
                  KOCHI, KERALA-682 011 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
       2          THE SECRETARY, KOCHI CORPORATION, PARK AVENUE ROAD,
                  MARINE DRIVE, KOCHI-682 011.
       3          THE HEALTH OFFICER, CORPORATION OF KOCHI, PARK AVENUE
                  ROAD, MARINE DRIVE, KOCHI, 682 011.
       4          THE CHAIRMAN, THYKKATTU DEVASWOM TRUST, VENNALA PO,
                  KOCHI, REPRESENTED BY T.G.N. KUMAR, RESIDING AT
                  33/3004, VENNALA P.O., KOCHI-682 028.
                  BY ADV SRI.P.S.BIJU


THIS       WRIT   PETITION   (CIVIL)   HAVING    COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
27.05.2021, ALONG WITH WA.736/2021 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT
ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.A No.736/2021 and con. cases
                                       - 5 -



                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                       PRESENT
                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
                                          &
                     THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.R.ANITHA
           THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2021 / 6TH JYAISHTA, 1943
                             WP(C) NO. 23106 OF 2020
PETITIONER:

                  SHAMEER P.S, AGED 35 YEARS
0




                  S/O. SHABA, MADAPPATT HOUSE, EROOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT
                  BY ADVS.
                  K.MOHANAKANNAN
                  SRI.H.PRAVEEN (KOTTARAKARA)


RESPONDENTS:

       1          CORPORATION OF KOCHI
                  PARK AVENUE ROAD, MARINE DRIVE, KOCHI, KERALA-682 011
       2          THE SECRETARY,KOCHI CORPORATION, PARK AVENUE ROAD,
                  MARINE DRIVE, KOCHI-682 011
       3          THE HEALTH OFFICER,CORPORATION OF KOCHI, PARK AVENUE
                  ROAD, MARINE DRIVE, KOCHI-682 011
       4          THE CHAIRMAN,THYKKATTU, DEVASWOM TRUST, VENNALA P.O.,
                  KOCHI REPRESENTED BY T.G.N.KUMAR, RESIDING AT 33/3004,
                  VENNALA P.O., KOCHI-682 028
                  BY ADV SRI.P.S.BIJU


THIS       WRIT   PETITION   (CIVIL)   HAVING    COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
27.05.2021, ALONG WITH WA.736/2021 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT
ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.A No.736/2021 and con. cases
                                 - 6 -



            K. Vinod Chandran & M.R. Anitha, JJ.
            -------------------------------------
     Writ Appeal No.736 of 2021, W.P(C) No.23106 of 2020,
                   W.P(C) No.9984 of 2020,
        WP(C)9783 of 2021 and W.P(C) No.11172 of 2021
             -------------------------------------
           Dated, this the 27th day of May, 2021

                              JUDGMENT

Vinod Chandran, J.

The writ appeal is against an interim order passed

by the learned Single Judge in a writ petition. The learned

Counsel for the appellant submits that by the interim order,

the petitioner/1st respondent has been permitted to continue

his business in vegetables and fruits despite the Corporation

having revoked his D&O licence. The revocation has come into

effect and the consequential order of stoppage of business as

per Ext.P14 and P15 have been challenged in the writ petition

from which the appeal arise. The learned Counsel for the 1st

respondent submits that the revocation order produced as

Ext.P10, is challenged in W.P(C) No. 23016/2020. We also

notice from the order impugned in the W.P.(C) that there are

a number of writ petitions pending between the parties and

the litigation has a chequered past. We hence called for the

writ petitions also for hearing to have a quietus in the

matter.

W.A No.736/2021 and con. cases

- 7 -

2. It is seen that the 1st respondent was carrying

on a business in vegetables and a cold storage as per Ext.P2

D&O licence. The appellant who was in management of a temple

was concerned with the desecration of the temple premises

with the waste generated from the business of cold storage

conducted by the 1st respondent. The appellant filed a writ

petition in which Ext.P4 judgment was passed. It was directed

that the competent authority of the Corporation would

consider the objections raised by the appellant and decide

upon the renewal of licence sought for and the complaint

raised of business being carried without a proper D&O licence

would also be looked into. Pursuant to Ext.P4 judgment Ext.P5

was passed directing stoppage of the business conducted by

the 1st respondent.

3. The said order of stoppage was challenged by the 1 st

respondent in W.P(C) No.9984 of 2020 which was heard along

with another writ petition, wherein a similar order was

challenged by yet another trader and Ext.P7 interim order was

passed. The undertaking of the petitioner therein, who is the

1st respondent in this appeal, that he would not conduct any

business other than in fruits and vegetables was recorded. As

a consequence the premises which was closed down and sealed

by the officials was directed to be resumed to the possession W.A No.736/2021 and con. cases

- 8 -

of the petitioner so as to enable him to conduct his

business. Noticing the objections raised against the

functioning of the business, it was also directed that the

Devaswom which is the appellant herein, who was not made a

party in the above writ petition, be impleaded. We see from

the records of W.P(C) No.9984/2020 that an impleading

petition was filed by the Devaswom itself immediately after

the interim order was passed. The matter is still pending,

which according to us is infructuous by reason of the

subsequent proceedings.

4. After Ext.P7 interim order, on 19.06.2020 it is

seen that the 1st respondent was issued with Ext.P8 D&O

licence for carrying on the business of vegetables and

fruits. Alleging non-consideration of the objections of the

appellant a contempt case was initiated, by the appellant as

against the non-compliance of the directions in Ext.P4

judgment. The contempt case was disposed off as per Ext.P11.

It was conceded in the contempt proceedings that the

Corporation had unilaterally granted renewal of the trade

licence and an opportunity was sought to remedy and rectify

the same. The learned Single Judge hence closed the contempt

case recording the submission of the Corporation and directed

consideration of the objections as had been stipulated in W.A No.736/2021 and con. cases

- 9 -

Ext.P4. The learned Single Judge was also cautious to observe

that there was no adjudication made by this court on the

merits of the controversy.

5. In compliance with Ext.P11 the parties were heard

and Ext.P10 order was passed by the Corporation revoking the

licence granted by Ext.P8. Ext.P10 was challenged in W.P(C)

No.23106/2020. The same was filed on 27.10.2020 and was

posted before Court on various dates. The matter was admitted

on 22.03.2021. However despite a prayer made for an interim

order, no stay of the order of revocation at Ext.P10 was

granted. Inspite of the 1st respondent having not obtained a

stay of the order of revocation, as is seen from the records

he continued with his business; which continuance was sans a

D&O licence. The Corporation authorities alertly took up the

matter and an inspection was conducted based on which a

report was filed by a team of employees of the Health

Department of the Corporation. It was categorically stated in

the report, Ext.P12, that the 1st respondent was carrying on a

vegetable and fruit stall in building No.42/856A (Old

No.33/147 C1). In addition, it was also reported that there

is an unauthorized construction extending to 110 sq.meters in

the premises. Notices were issued and eventually Ext.P15

order was passed. Ext.P15 directed removal of the W.A No.736/2021 and con. cases

- 10 -

unauthorised constructions and stoppage of the business.

6. As we observed, while Ext.P15 was challenged in

the present writ petition Ext.P10 was challenged in an

earlier writ petition. Ext.P15 is a consequence of Ext.P10

order. The revocation of the D&O licence as per Ext.P10 was

not stayed in the earlier proceedings. The 1st respondent

ought not to have continued his business even confined to

vegetables and fruits. This is for the simple reason that he

had no D&O licence to carry on the business for reason of the

revocation order having not been stayed. In the subsequent

writ petition challenging the consequential order the learned

Single Judge according to us, inadvertently directed

continuance of the business. We also see that as of now even

if the revocation order was interfered with, the licence at

Ext.P8 does not revive, as it has expired as early as on

31.03.2021.

7. The learned Counsel for the petitioner/1st

respondent fervently argued before us that he had continued

the business only by virtue of Ext.P7 order. We are unable to

countenance the said contention especially since Ext.P8

issuance of licence and Ext.P10 revocation were subsequent to

Ext.P7 order of this Court. We also do not approve of the

said contention as one bona fide made, especially since the W.A No.736/2021 and con. cases

- 11 -

1st respondent quite aware of this position had challenged the

revocation in a separate writ petition. In the above context

the learned Counsel for the 1st respondent submitted that he

has now made a fresh application as per Ext.P16 for D&O

licence, which could be directed to be considered. It is also

prayed that till such consideration the 1st respondent may be

allowed to continue the business.

8. We are of the opinion that there could be a

consideration made of Ext.P16, but after hearing the Devaswom

also. However we are not inclined to permit the continuance

of the business especially noticing the fact that despite a

revocation of trade licence and the same having not been

stayed by this Court in a challenge made, the 1st respondent

has been continuing the business. To bring a quietus to the

matter we are of the opinion that the following orders shall

be passed settling the dispute as of now.

9. W.P(C) No.9984 of 2020 filed by the 1st respondent

in the appeal is against the earlier stop memo issued.

W.P.(C) No.9783 of 2021 filed by the appellant herein sought

further proceedings on Ext.P12 report. Both these writ

petitions do not survive and are closed as infructuous. In

W.P.(C) No. 185/2021 we see that the appellant has

contentions with respect to other traders also. In such W.A No.736/2021 and con. cases

- 12 -

circumstance the same shall be considered by the Bench having

roster.

10. We issue the following directions, disposing of

WA 736/20 W.P(C) No.11172/2021 and 23106/2020.

Considering the fact that the petitioner is carrying on

the business of perishable items, we permit the continuance

of the business till 1.00 pm on 01.06.2021. We direct the 1st

respondent to then stop the business carried on in the

premises. The Corporation shall inspect the premises and

ensure the stoppage. If the petitioner has complied with our

directions as also removed the unauthorised constructions,

then and only then the Corporation shall take up

consideration of renewal of licence, within two weeks from

that date. The appellant and the 1 st respondent shall be

issued with notice and a hearing shall be conducted within

the said period. An order shall be passed within one week

from the date of hearing. The rival contentions of the

parties are left open to be agitated before the Corporation.

Ordered accordingly.

Sd/-

K. Vinod Chandran,Judge

Sd/-

M.R Anitha, Judge jma W.A No.736/2021 and con. cases

- 13 -

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 9783/2021

ANNEXURE/EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.3414/2020 DATED 26/02/2020.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN COC NO.1112/2020 IN WP(C) NO.3414/2020 DATED 24/09/2020. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS NO.MOH13/004584/2020 DATED 18/12/2020.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.ISO/MOH13/004585/2020 DATED 19/03/2020 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT ISSUED TO THE 5TH RESPONDENT.

W.A No.736/2021 and con. cases

- 14 -

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 11172/2021

ANNEXURE/EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE CORPORATION DATED 9.3.2020.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COY OF THE LICENCE ISSUED BY THE CORPORATION OF KOCHI DATED 09.11.2018. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDNET CORPORATION DATED 28.2.2019. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 26.2.2020 IN WRIT PETITION (C) 3414/2020.

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE BEARING NO. MOH 13/004584/20 DATED 30.4.2020, ISSUED BY THE CORPORATION OF KOCHI.

EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER GO(RT) NO.820/2020/LSGD DATED 4.5.2020.

EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER PASSD IN WRIT PETITION NO.9984/2010 DATED 15.5.2020. EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE LICENCE ISSUED BY THE CORPORATION DATED 19.6.2020.

EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 21.10.2020.

EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT, DATED 22.10.2020.

EXHIBIT P11 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN CCC NO.1112/2020 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3414/2020 DATED 24.9.2020. EXHIBIT P12 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 18.12.2020 OF THE CORPORATION WITH INSPECTION REPORT. EXHIBIT P13 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION SENT BY THE PETITIONER TO THE CORPORATION DATED 6.1.2021. EXHIBIT P14 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 19.3.2021 ISSUED BY THE CORPORATION. EXHIBIT P15 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 21.4.2021.

EXHIBIT P16 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF LICENCE WITH POSTAL RECEIPT DATED 4.5.2021 SENT BY THE PETITIONER.

W.A No.736/2021 and con. cases

- 15 -

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 23106/2020

ANNEXURE/EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE CORPORATION DATED 9.3.2020 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE LICENCE ISSUED BY THE CORPORATION OF KOCHI DATED 15.10.2018 EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE CORPORATION CORPORATION DATED 28.2.2020 EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 26.2.2020 IN WRIT PETITION (C) 3414/2020 EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE BEARING NO.MOH 13/004584/20 DATED 30.4.2020 ISSUED BY THE CORPORATION OF KOCHI EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER GO (RT) NO.820/2020/LSGD DATED 4.5.2020 EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER PASSED IN WRIT PETITION NO.9984/2020 DATED 15.5.2020 EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE LICENCE ISSUED BY THE CORPORATION DATED 19.6.2020 EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 21.10.2020 EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT, DATED 22.10.2020 EXHIBIT P11 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN CC NO.112/2020 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3414/2020 DATED 24.9.2020

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter