Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12398 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 May, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MAY 2021 / 21ST VAISAKHA, 1943
Crl.Rev.Pet.No.334 OF 2021
(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 26.11.2020 IN CRL.A NO.274/2017 ON THE
FILE OF THE COURT OF SESSION, THRISSUR , WHICH AROSE OUT OF THE
JUDGMENT DATED 06.11.2017 IN ST NO.117/2017 ON THE FILE OF
JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS - II, CHALAKUDY)
PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED:
SOUMYA V.S., AGED 38, W/O.ADVOCATE RAVIKUMAR,
VADAKKEKARA HOUSE, THADIAMPADU P.O., PEPPARA,
IDUKKI VILLAGE, IDUKKI TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT,
PIN - 685 602.
BY ADVS.
DR.V.N.SANKARJEE
SRI.V.N.MADHUSUDANAN
SMT.R.UDAYA JYOTHI
SRI.M.M.VINOD
SMT.M.SUSEELA
SMT. KEERTHI B. CHANDRAN
SHRI.VIJAYAN PILLAI P.K.
SRI.C.PURUSHOTHAMAN NAIR
SHRI.SANAL C.S
SHRI.NITHEESH.M
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANTS AND STATE:
1 HARIDAS, AGED 51, S/O.PALATINGAL GOPALAN NAIR,
PALATHINGAL HOUSE, EAST CHALAKUDY VILLAGE,
KOODAPUZHA DESOM AND POST, CHALAKUDY TALUK,
THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680 022.
2 THE STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031.
R1 BY ADV. T.K.NAZAR
P.P.SMT.K.K.SHEEBA
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 11.05.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.Rev.Pet.No.334 OF 2021
-2-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
--------------------------------------
Crl.R.P. No. 334 of 2021
---------------------------------------
Dated this the 11th day of May, 2021
ORDER
This revision petition is filed against the conviction and
sentence imposed on the appellant as per the judgment
dated 26.11.2020 in Crl.A.No.274 of 2017 on the file of the
Session's Judge, Thrissur which arises from the judgment
dated 06.11.2017 in S.T.No.117 of 2017 on the file of the
Judicial Magistrate of the First Class - II, Chalakudy. It was
a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act.
2. When this revision came up for consideration, the
learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner
submitted that the matter is settled and a compounding
petition is filed. A counsel appeared for the first respondent
and he submitted that an affidavit is filed stating that the Crl.Rev.Pet.No.334 OF 2021
matter is settled and the first respondent has no grievance
against the petitioner. Heard the learned Public Prosecutor
also.
3. In the light of the fact that the matter is settled
between the parties and a compounding petition is also
filed, I think the conviction and sentence imposed on the
revision petitioner can be set aside.
Therefore, this Crl.R.P. is allowed. The conviction and
sentence imposed on the appellant, as per the judgment
dated 26.11.2017 in Crl.A.No.274 of 2017 which arises
from the judgment dated 06.11.2017 in S.T.No. 117 of
2017, is set aside.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE akv Crl.Rev.Pet.No.334 OF 2021
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE 1 AFFIDAVIT DATED 5/5/2021 SWORN TO BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!