Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12397 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 May, 2021
WP(C).No.9896 OF 2021(J) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MAY 2021 / 21ST VAISAKHA, 1943
WP(C).No.9896 OF 2021(J)
PETITIONER:
MANIKUTTAN
AGED 56 YEARS
S/O.NARAYANAN, NEENDUTHALAKKAL HOUSE,
KUNDUKAD P.O., MADAKKATHRA VILLAGE,
THRISSUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE DISASTER MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY
THRISSUR, CIVIL STATION, THRISSUR,
REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
THRISSUR PIN 680 020
2 THE DISTRICT GEOLOGIST
DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY,
DISTRICT OFFICE, THRISSUR DISTRICT,
PIN 680 020
3 THE DIRECTOR
MINING AND GEOLOGY,
OFFICE OF THE MINING AND GEOLOGY,
KESAVADASAPURAM, PATTAM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.
4 DISTRICT COLLECTOR
COLLECTORATE, KALYAN NAGAR,
AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR
PIN 680 003
5 THE VILLAGE OFFICER
MADAKATHARA VILLAGE,
THRISSUR DISTRICT 680 651
GOVT.PLEADER SRI B UNNIKRISHNA KAIMAL
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
11.05.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.9896 OF 2021(J) 2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 11th day of May 2021
Admit. Government pleader takes notice for the
respondents.
2. The petitioner who is the owner of 39.15 ares of
property comprised in survey numbers 1246/1, 1246/2 and
1246/3 of Madakkathara village in Thrissur taluk had applied for
permit to remove ordinary earth which had accumulated behind
this residential house during the floods and is a threat to this
residential building. It is stated that the application was filed on
7.11.2018 and that on 9.1.2019, the 3 rd respondent had issued
orders permitting the petitioner to remove the ordinary earth
situated dangerously. This was followed by subsequent orders
on 22.3.2019 and 6.5.2019, since the petitioner could not
remove the entire quantity of the ordinary earth. It is the case
of the petitioner that even though the validity of the permit was
extended on 6.5.2019, he could not remove the entire earth. In
the circumstances, he states that he submitted an application on
5.4.2021, which is produced as Exhibit P5 along with the writ
petition. Exhibit P6 is the receipt issued by the 2 nd respondent
evidencing the receipt of Exhibit P5 application. The only prayer
in the Writ Petition is that the 2nd respondent may be directed
to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P5 application at the
earliest, since the monsoon is fast arriving.
3. Heard.
4. Having regard to the limited prayer made in the Writ
petition, the 2nd respondent is directed to consider and dispose
of Exhibit P5 application in accordance with law, at the earliest,
at any rate within 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of
this judgment.
The Writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
T.R.RAVI
JUDGE
dsn
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPIES OF TAX RECEIPT DATED 28.5.2020 ISSUED BY THE FOURTH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE HEAP OF EARTH STACKED BEHIND THE HOUSE OF THE PETITIONER IN DANGEROUS CONDITION.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT NO.K1/113138/18 DATED 7/11/2018.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 6/5/2019 ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 5/4/2021 SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER BEFORE SECOND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 5/4/2021 ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER REGARDING RECEIPT OF EXHIBIT P5 APPLICATION.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!