Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9978 Ker
Judgement Date : 24 March, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 3RD CHAITHRA, 1943
WP(C).No.1184 OF 2021(W)
PETITIONER:
DEEPAK S.
AGED 34 YEARS
S/O. K.R. SASIKUMAR, DEEPAM HOUSE,
UDYOGAMANDAL, MANJUMMEL P.O,
ERNAKULAM - 683501.
BY ADV. SRI.P.A.ABHILASH
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY,
KERALA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001.
2 DISTRICT COLLECTOR/DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,
CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, PIN - 682030.
3 STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
IRINJALAKKUDA POLICE STATION,
THRISSUR - 680125.
4 CHAIRMAN
DRUG DISPOSAL COMMITTEE,
OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
DISTRICT C BRANCH, THRISSUR RURAL, PIN - 680503.
5 DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
DISTRICT C BRANCH, THRISSUR, RURAL, PIN - 680503.
SMT. M. K. PUSHPALATHA, SR.PP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
24.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.1184 OF 2021(W)
-2-
JUDGMENT
The grievance of the petitioner is that the Drug
Disposal Committee did not consider the decision of this
Court in Smart Logistics (M/s.) Kozhikode v. State of
Kerala and others [2020 (5) KHC 139] before disposing
of Ext.P4 representation filed by the petitioner as per
Ext.P5.
2. It has been further submitted by the
learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner
was not even granted an opportunity of hearing before
passing Ext.P5.
3. The Court in Smart Logistics (supra) held
that the owner of the vehicle is having the liberty to
make representation before the Drug Disposal
Committee concerned raising his claim over the vehicle WP(C).No.1184 OF 2021(W)
concerned, which was seized under the Narcotic Drugs
and Psychotropic Substances Act. It was further held in
Smart Logistics (Supra) that if any such representation
is made by the owner of the vehicle, the Drug Disposal
Committee, before taking a decision on the disposal of
the vehicle, shall grant an opportunity of hearing to the
owner and pass appropriate orders on the
representation.
Since no opportunity was granted to the owner
of the vehicle, who is the petitioner herein, Ext.P5
communication expressing the inability of the 4 th
respondent to consider the application cannot be
sustained. In the said circumstances, I am inclined to
set aside Ext.P5 and direct the 4 th respondent to pass
order afresh on the representation of the petitioner in
accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and at
any rate, within one month from the date of WP(C).No.1184 OF 2021(W)
receipt/production of a copy of this judgment,
affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the
petitioner as held by this Court in Smart Logistics
(Supra). The copy of the order, which will be passed on
the representation shall be communicated to the
petitioner by 4th respondent and till such
communication is made, the vehicle bearing
registration No.KL-41-N-5890 involved in crime
No.743/2020 of Irinjalakkuda Police Station registered
under Section 20 (b)(ii)A of the NDPS Act shall not be
disposed of.
Sd/-
B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
JUDGE Nkr/24.03.2021 WP(C).No.1184 OF 2021(W)
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF THE VEHICLE BEARING REGISTRATION NO. KL 41 N 5890
EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE VEHICLE PASS DATED 01.06.2020.
EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE FIR NO. 743/2020 OF INRIJNALAKUDA POLICE STATION, THRISSUR RURAL.
EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 21.12.2020 ISSUED BY THE DRUGS DISPOSAL COMMITTEE THRISSUR, RURAL.
RESPONDENTS'S EXHIBITS: NIL
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!