Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 7960 Ker
Judgement Date : 8 March, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
MONDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 17TH PHALGUNA, 1942
MACA.No.1629 OF 2010(C)
AGAINST THE AWARD IN OP(MV)NO. 300/2003 DATED 30-12-2009 OF MOTOR
ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ,ATTINGAL
APPELLANTS:/APPLICANTS 1 TO 3
1 LEKHA, AGED 34 YEARS, W/O.RAJEEV,
VATTAVILA VEEDU,AROOR,,
MULAKKALATHUKAVU P.O,
KILIMANOOR.
2 SIVARAJ (MINOR), S/O.RAJEEV
REPRESENTED BY MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN,,
FIRST APPELLANT LEKHA,,
VATTAVILA VEEDU,AROOR,,
MULAKKALATHUKAVU P.O,
KILIMANOOR.
3 RAHUL RAJ (MINOR), S/O.RAJEEV
REPRESENTED BY MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN,,
FIRST APPELLANT LEKHA,
VATTAVIALA VEEDU,
AROOR,, MULAKKALATHUKAVU P.O,
KILIMANOOR.
BY ADVS.
SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF
SRI.A.MOHAMED RASHEED
RESPONDENTS/(RESPONDENTS & ADDL. APPLICANTS 6 TO 9):
1 S.R.DAS, S/O.SUKUMARAN
DAS BHAVAN, MANALIMUKKU,
VENJARAMOODU P.O,, PIN - 695 607/
2 ANIL KUMAR, S/O.CHANDRAN
CHARUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU,
PARANDAKUZHI,
THATTATHUMALA P.O,,
KILIMANOOR 695 601.
3 N.NADIRAHA, D/O.NAZAR,
PANAYIL PUTHEN VEEDU,
ARUKANJIRAM,
MACA.No.1629 OF 2010(C)
2
PULIYOORKONAM,MADAVOOR P.O,,
PALLICKAL 695 604.
4 DIVISIONAL MANAGER,
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,
DIVISIONAL OFFICE,,
LMS COMPOUND,PALAYAM,,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.
5 SREELASTHA, D/O.SREEDHARANA & LAKSHMI
PARAYIL PUTHEN VEEDU,
NEDUNGODU,,
KILIMANOOR P.O,PIN - 695 601.
6 REETHA, D/O.SREEDHARNA & LAKSHMI
PARAYIL PUTHEN VEEDU,
NEDUNGODU, KILIMANOOR P.O,PIN - 695 601.
7 SUDEVAN, S/O.SREEDHARNA & LAKSHMI
PARAYIL PUTHEN VEEDU,
NEDUNGODU, KILIMANOOR P.O,PIN - 695 601.
8 SAJEEV, D/O.SREEDHARNA & LAKSHMI
PARAYIL PUTHEN VEEDU,
NEDUNGODU, KILIMANOOR P.O,PIN - 695 601.
R1 BY ADV. SMT.ARYA HARSHAN
SRI.S.JUSTUS
THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 08.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
MACA.No.1629 OF 2010(C)
3
C.S.DIAS,J
------------------------
M.A.C.A.No.1629 of 2010
------------------------
Dated this the 8th day of March, 2021
JUDGMENT
Despite the orders dated 12.11.2019 and
26.11.2019, the appellants have not taken steps to
effect service of notice on respondents 4 to 8. The
appeal is of the year 2010. Hence, it is assumed that
the appellants are no longer desirous in prosecuting
the appeal.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.
Sd/-
C.S.DIAS,JUDGE
dlK 08.03.2021
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!