Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 7097 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 March, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
MONDAY, THE 01ST DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 10TH PHALGUNA, 1942
WP(C).No.5219 OF 2021(B)
PETITIONER:
SMITHA T.S., AGED 46 YEARS
W/O MANI,
MASMARA, MEVANAKONAM, KALLUVATHUKKAL P.O.,
KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-691578.
BY ADVS.
SMT.M.R.JAYALATHA
SMT.K.VINAYA
ABHILASH.B
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
2 REVENUE DIVISONAL OFFICER
PUNALUR, KOLLAM-691013.
3 THE TAHSILDAR
KOLLAM, KALUVATHUKKAL VILLAGE, KOLLAM TALUK,
KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-691578.
4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER
KALLUVATHUKKAL VILLAGE,
KOLLAM TALUK, NADAKKAL ,
OYOOR ROAD, NADAKKAL P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT-
691578.
W.P.(C) No.5219 of 2021 2
5 AGRICULTURAL OFFICER
KRISHI BHAVAN KALLUVATHUKKAL, KALLUVATHUKKAL
VILLAGE, KALLUVATHUKKAL P.O.,
MUKKADA, PARIPPALLY,
KOLLAM DISTRICT-695146.
OTHER PRESENT:
GP. RAVI KRISHNAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 01.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No.5219 of 2021 3
W.P.(C) No.5219 of 2021
-----------------------------------------------
JUDGMENT
Ext.P2 is an application preferred by the petitioner in
Form No.5 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland
Rules (the Rules) for removal of the property of the petitioner
referred to in the writ petition from the data bank prepared in
terms of the Kerala conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act,
2008 (the Act). Ext.P3 is another application preferred by the
petitioner in Form No.6 of the Rules for permission to utilize the
said land which is an un-notified land in terms of the Act, for other
purposes. The grievance of the petitioner in the writ petition
concerns the inaction on the part of the second respondent in
taking a decision on Ext.P2 and Ext.P3 applications.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as
also the learned Government Pleader.
3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of
the case, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition
directing the second respondent to take up and pass appropriate
orders on Ext.P2 in accordance with law, if the same is received
and pending, after affording the petitioner an opportunity of
hearing. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say that if Ext.P2
application is allowed, orders shall be passed by the second
respondent simultaneously on Ext.P3 application as well. This shall
be done within three months from the date of production of a copy
of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the
petitioner. If the applications directed to be disposed of are found
defective, the defect shall be intimated to the petitioner by the
second respondent immediately on production of a copy of this
judgment, and the second respondent will be entitled to avail the
time taken by the petitioner to cure the defects in the applications
also, for compliance of the directions contained in this judgment.
It is made clear that the hearing in terms of this judgment can
either be physical or through video conference.
Sd/-
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.
ds 01.03.2021
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 12.5.2020 WITH TYPED COPY.
EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION IN FORM NI 5 DATED 30.12.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE FORM 6 DATED
30.12.2015 APPLICATION FILED BY THE
PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!