Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10418 Ker
Judgement Date : 26 March, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 5TH CHAITHRA, 1943
WP(C).No.14713 OF 2014(L)
PETITIONER:
A.M.YOUSEFF SAIT,
RESIDING AT 8/207, MAMMA VILLA,
GUJARATHI ROAD, KOCHI -682 002,
MUTHAWALI, CUTCHI HANAFI MOSQUE,
MATTANCHERY, KOCHI -2, ALSO KNOWN AS
CUTCHI MEMON HANAFI JAMA AT PALLI WAKF.
BY ADV. SRI.P.U.ZIYAD
RESPONDENTS:
1 SIDDIQUE
C.C 6/837, MALOTHU PARAMBU,
MATTANCHERY, KOCHI - 682 002.
2 CORPORATION OF KOCHI
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, CORPORATION OFFICE,
PARK AVENUE ROAD, KOCHI -11.
3 KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, WAKF
BOARD OFFICE, VIP ROAD, KALOOR, KOCHI - 682 017.
4 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 001.
BY ADV. SRI.K.J.MANU RAJ
R2 BY ADV. SRI.V.S.SREEJITH, SC, COCHIN CORPORATION
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
26.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C)No.14713 of 2014-L
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 26th day of March, 2021
This writ petition is filed by the petitioner complaining that an
illegal construction is carried out by the 1 st respondent in a property
within the limits of the Corporation of Kochi. According to the petitioner,
the said complaint was kept pending without taking any action and which
persuaded the petitioner to approach this court by filing this writ petition.
2. The writ petition was pending before this court from the year
2014 without securing any interim orders. Normally it cannot be believed
that any application filed before the Corporation is pending consideration
at this distance of time but however learned counsel for the Corporation
as well as the counsel for the petitioner submitted that perhaps
consequent to the pendency of O.S.No.404 of 2010 before the Munsiff's
Court, Kochi, action may not have been taken on the basis of the
complaint submitted by the petitioner. Anyhow, the writ petition is to be
disposed of since it is a very old matter.
Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner Sri.P.U.Ziyad and
learned standing counsel for the Corporation Sri.V.S.Sreejith, this writ
petition is disposed of, directing the Secretary of the Corporation to
consider Ext.P2 complaint if it is still remaining consideration, however W.P.(C)No.14713 of 2014-L
subject to any orders passed by the civil court in the pending
proceedings as is specified above. The exercise shall be completed at the
earliest and at any rate within two months from the date of receipt of a
copy of this judgment subject to any orders passed by the court in the
proceeding specified above. However I make it clear that if already a
decision is taken on the basis of Ext.P2 complaint, the issue shall not be
reopened and the order and the directions contained above shall stand
vacated.
Sd/-
Shaji P.Chaly Judge
vpv W.P.(C)No.14713 of 2014-L
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 22/05/2014.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 25/04/2014.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 25/04/2014 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
/TRUE COPY/
P.A. TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!