Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10229 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 March, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 4TH CHAITHRA, 1943
Con.Case(C).No.453 OF 2021 IN OP(KAT). 82/2020
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 09.03.2020 IN OP(KAT) NO.82/2020 OF
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
BIJU.S., AGED 47 YEARS
S/O.M. SALIM, RESIDING AT M.S. MANZIL, MAITHANI,
KARICHIRA, PALLIPPURAM P.O. ,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 316.
BY ADV. SRI.S.MOHAMMED AL RAFI
RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT:
SRI. T.K.JOSE
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,
SECRETARY, STATE OF KERALA, HOME DEPARTMENT,
GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.
BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.B.RAMANAND
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 25.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No.453 of 2021 2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 25th day of March, 2021
K. Vinod Chandran, J.
We are told that the matter was considered
and rejected and hence there is substantial
compliance of the judgment dated 09.03.2020 in
OP(KAT) No.82 of 2020. Learned Counsel for the
petitioner submits that copy of the order was not
served. The same has been handed over to the learned
Counsel for the petitioner across the Bar.
In such circumstance, we do not find any
contempt arising from the judgment. Hence the
contempt case is closed without prejudice to the
rights of the petitioner to challenge the order.
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JUDGE
sp/25/03/2021
//True Copy//
P.A. To Judge APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 09/03/2020 IN O.P.(KAT) NO.82 OF 2020.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!