Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10191 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 March, 2021
W.P(c).No.5156/2020-T 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 4TH CHAITHRA, 1943
WP(C).No.5156 OF 2020(T)
PETITIONERS:
1 AMBARIMATHA TRUST
RUBY LANE, THAMMANAM, ERNAKULAM 32, REPRESENTED BY
TRUSTEE, MR VIMAL ARACKAL, AGED 48
S/O. CHARLES ARACKAL.
2 LEELA JACKSON,
D/O. LATE JACKSON ARACKAL, ARACKAL HOUSE, NOW
RESIDING AT RATHAN BABU ROAD, 15/1/ KOSIPUR,
CULCUTTA 2, HAVING ADDRESSED AT ARACKAL VEEDU,
KANDAKADAVU MURI, CHELLANAM VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF
ATTORNEY VIMAL ARACKAL, AGED 48,
S/O. CHARLES ARACKAL.
3 MR. VIMAL ARACKAL
AGED 48 YEARS
S/O. CHARLES ARACKAL, ARACAKL HOUSE, RUBY LANE,
THAMMANAM P.O. KOCHI, TRUSTEE, AMBARIMATHA TRUST,
RUBY LANE, THAMMANAM, ERNAKULAM 32.
BY ADV. SRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY
RESPONDENTS:
1 DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
ERNAKULAM 682 030.
2 REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
FORT COCHIN, ERNAKULAM 682 001.
3 STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
KANNAMALI POLICE STATION, KANNAMALI, KOCHI 682 008.
4 KANDAKADAVU PADASEKHARA COMMITTEE,
AGED 55 YEARS
KANDAKADAVU 682 008, REP BY SECRETARY, GEORGE,
PUTHUKKATHUSSERY.
W.P(c).No.5156/2020-T 2
5 KEATH ANTONY,
AGED 35 YEARS
S/O V T ANTONY, VACHAKKAL HOUSE, CHELLANAM P.O.,
KOCHI 682 007.
R5 BY ADV. SRI.S.SUJIN
SMT.VINITHA.B, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
25.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P(c).No.5156/2020-T 3
P.V.ASHA, J.
-----------------------------------------------------
W.P(c) No.5156 of 2020-T
----------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 25th day of March, 2021
JUDGMENT
The petitioner Trust claims that respondents 4 and 5 are engaged in fish
farming and prawn filtration without any licence. Pointing out the same, the
petitioners have submitted Ext.P8 representation before the 1 st respondent. The
complaint of the petitioners is that the 1 st respondent is not taking any action on
Ext.P8 and respondents 4 and 5 continue fish farming without statutory
permission.
2. As the petitioners claim that no action is taken on Ext.P8 complaint,
there shall be a direction to the 1 st respondent to consider and pass orders on
Ext.P8 complaint after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners as
well as respondents 4 and 5 in accordance with law within a period of three
months from the date of receipt of a copyof this judgment.
The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.
Sd/- (P.V.ASHA, JUDGE)
rtr/
APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE TRUST DEED WITH NO.
65/IV/2017 DATED 21.08.2017 OF SRO MARADU.
EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE NOTARIZED COPY OF THE AGREEMENT OF ENTRUSTMENT OF AMBARI MATHA TRUST DATED 03.10.2019.
EXHIBIT P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 34195/2018 DATED 22.10.2018.
EXHIBIT P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 29053/19 DATED 30.10.2019.
EXHIBIT P5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE SKETCH OF THE PROPERTY ISSUED BY TALUK SURVEYOR, KOCHI TALUK DTD.NIL.
EXHIBIT P6 THE TRUE COPY OF THE POWER OF ATTORNEY WITH NO. 203/4/2016 DATED 25.10.2016 OF SRO KOCHI.
EXHIBIT P7 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 21.12.2019 OF FISHERIES DEPUTY DIRECTOR OFFICE.
EXHIBIT P8 THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPRESENTATION TO STOP THE ILLEGAL FISH FARMING AND PRAWN FILTRATION DATED 10.02.2020.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!