Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13391 Ker
Judgement Date : 28 June, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
MONDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE 2021 / 7TH ASHADHA, 1943
MACA NO. 397 OF 2012
AGAINST THE AWARD DATED 14.12.11 IN OPMV NO.538/2011 OF MOTOR
ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, KOZHIKODE
APPELLANT:
RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
KOZHIKODE, REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPUTY MANAGER, REGIONAL
OFFICE, ERNAKULAM.
BY ADV SRI.GEORGE CHERIAN (THIRUVALLA)
RESPONDENTS:
1 RATHEESH
AGED 35 YEARS
S/O DAMODHARAN NAIR, 1141, PARATHAPOYIL HOUSE,
VENNAKKODU P.O., CHATHAMANGALAM, KOZHIKODE.
2 NIVED (MINOR)
AGED:2-1/2 YEARS, DATE OF BIRTH: 28.05.2008 REP. BY HIS
FATHER RATHEESH, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT 1141,
PARATHAPOYIL HOUSE, VENNAKKODU P.O., CHATHAMANGALAM,
KOZHIKODE-673 003.
3 SIVADASAN NAIR,
AGED 58 YEARS,
S/O RAGHAVAN ADIYODI, RESIDING AT : 194 A,
MANIYHANCHERI P.O. THALAKKULATHOOR, KOZHIKODE-673 028.
4 RADHA
W/O. SIVADASAN NAIR, RESIDING AT : 194 A, MANIYANCHERI
P.O., THALAKKULATHOOR, KOZHIKODE - 673 028.
BY ADV SMT.K.V.RESHMI
THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
28.06.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
A. BADHARUDEEN, J.
-----------------------------------------------------
M.A.C.A No.397 of 2012-C
----------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 28th day of June, 2021
JUDGMENT
This appeal arises out of award dated 14.12.2011 in O.P(MV).No.538 of 2011
on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Kozhikode at the instance of the
original 3rd respondent Reliance General Insurance Company Limited. The original
petitioners and other respondents were arrayed as respondents in this appeal.
2. The parties in this appeal will be referred as to their status before the
Tribunal.
3. The original petitioners filed application under Section 166 of the Motor
Vehicles Act and claimed Rs.8 lakhs as compensation in consequence to the death of
one Ranjini in a Motor Vehicle mishap on 23.05.2010.
4. The Tribunal considered the matter on merits after adducing evidence
and granted compensation amounting to Rs.5,07,400/- as against the claim of Rs.8
lakhs.
5. The Insurance Company, which is aggrieved by the quantum of
compensation granted by the Tribunal, is before this Court.
6. When the matter was heard, the learned counsel for the insurance
company submitted that in view of the latest rulings of the Honourable Supreme
Court, the compensation awarded under various heads under challenge would not
sustain. In view of the matter, the learned counsel could not justify the contentions
raised in the appeal.
7. I have perused the award and I could find that a reasonable award was
passed by the Tribunal and it could not be held as excess on any appreciation. In
view of the matter, there is no reason to interfere with the impugned award and as
such the award passed by the Tribunal is liable to be confirmed.
In the result, the appeal is dismissed with no costs.
Sd/- (A. BADHARUDEEN, JUDGE) rtr/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!