Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13364 Ker
Judgement Date : 28 June, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
MONDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE 2021 / 7TH ASHADHA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 11669 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
AJITH K. CHERIYAN
AGED 53 YEARS
S/O. K.V.CHERIYAN, KANNUMPUTHOOR, AJI BHAVAN, CHENNEERKARA,
PATHANAMTHITTA.
BY ADVS.
R.SUNIL KUMAR
A.SALINI LAL
RESPONDENT:
DISTRICT GEOLOGIST
DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, MINI CIVIL STATION,
ARANMULA, PATHANAMTHITTA-689533.
BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.PAUL ABRAHAM VAKKANAL
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.06.2021,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
SATHISH NINAN, J.
==================
W. P. (C) No.11669 of 2021
==================
Dated this the 28th day of June, 2021
JUDGMENT
For construction of a building in the property
of the petitioner, he obtained Exts.P1 and P2 Building Permit and Development Permit. Alleging
that the petitioner is not being issued with
mineral transit passes by the respondent-Geologist
for removal of earth in terms of the Development
Permit, the petitioner approached this Court in
W.P.(C) No.3609/2021. Pending the writ petition,
the Geologist conducted a site inspection and
reported that though as per the Development Permit
938.08 cubic meter earth was permitted to be
removed, the actual quantity excavated is much
more. The petitioner undertook before this Court
that he will pay penalty including royalty and
fine. Accordingly the writ petition was disposed of
directing the Geologist to consider the request and
pass appropriate orders.
W. P. (C) No.11669 of 2021
2. It appears that, pursuant to the judgment in
W.P.(C) No.3609/2021, the petitioner was required
to pay royalty and fine amounting to `8,92,720/-
for excavation conducted beyond the permitted
quantity. The petitioner has as per Ext.P4 paid the
royalty and fine imposed. Thereafter as per Ext.P5,
the petitioner was issued with 1071 mineral transit
passes for transport of 10712 MT of earth.
According to the petitioner, on account of the lock
down imposed consequent on the Covid-19 Pandemic,
and due to other related issues, out of the 1071
passes that were issued to the petitioner only 98
passes could be used. The remaining passes were
surrendered before the Geologist on 28.04.2021. Now
the petitioner seeks for renewal and re-issuance of
the remaining 973 passes.
3. Without expressing anything on the merits of
the claim, it is ordered that, if the petitioner
approaches the respondent and makes a request for
renewal and issuance of transit passes claimed to
have been surrendered by him as noticed above, the
respondent shall conduct site inspection, with W. P. (C) No.11669 of 2021
notice to the petitioner, and thereafter pass
appropriate orders on such request. Let orders be
passed within a period of six weeks from the date
of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
Sd/-
SATHISH NINAN JUDGE
kns/-
//True Copy// P.S. to Judge APPENDIX OF WP(C) 11669/2021
PETITIONER ANNEXURE
Exhibit P1 COPY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT.
Exhibit P2 COPY OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT PERMIT.
Exhibit P3 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.3609/21 DATED 19.3.2021.
Exhibit P4 COPY OF THE CHELLAN DATED 13.4.21.
Exhibit P5 COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE RESPONDENT DATED 19.4.21.
Exhibit P6 COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT DATED 28.4.21.
-----
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!