Sunday, 07, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Suo Motu vs State Of Kerala
2021 Latest Caselaw 12664 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12664 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 June, 2021

Kerala High Court
Suo Motu vs State Of Kerala on 1 June, 2021
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                      Present:
                  THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR
                                          &
                       THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR
                                          &
                      THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY

              TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE 2021 / 11TH JYAISHTA, 1943
                              WP(C) No.11316/2021 (S)


PETITIONER
      SUO MOTU PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE HIGH COURT
      IN THE MATTER OF EXTENSION OF ORDERS OF STAY GRANTED BY
      THE HIGH COURT IN WP(C)NO.9400/2020(S) AND CUSTODY ORDERS
      IN RESPECT OF CHILDREN ISSUED BY THE FAMILY COURTS, WHICH
      ARE DUE TO EXPIRE OR COMMENCE DURING THE PERIOD OF
      LOCKDOWN/COVID RESTRICTIONS.

RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT IN WPC NO.9400/2020(S)
      STATE OF KERALA,
      REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY,
      GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN 695 001.

      This Suo Motu writ petition again coming on for orders upon perusing the
petition,this Court's order dated 19/05/2021 and upon hearing the arguments of
SRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP,ADVOCATE GENERAL,SRI.THOMAS ABRAHAM, PRESIDENT HIGH COURT
ADVOCATES'ASSOCIATION,SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM(SENIOR ADVOCATE),ADVOCATE SRI.JAWAHAR
JOSE,AND ADVOCATE SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW the court passed the following:


                                                                             P.T.O.
rs.
                         S.MANIKUMAR, C.J.,
                        C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J.
                                  &
                         SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
             ----------------------------------
                     W.P.(C) No.11316 of 2021
             ----------------------------------
                 Dated this the 1st day of June, 2021

                                     ORDER

S.MANIKUMAR, C.J.

On 19th May, 2021, we passed a detailed interim order, in the

matter of all the proceedings before this Court, as well as in lower

courts/Tribunals, and issued directions that, no coercive action be taken

till 31.05.2021.

2. The said interim order expired and thus, this suo motu writ

petition is listed today. Government have issued G.O.(Rt)

No.444/2021/DMD dated 29th May, 2021, extending the lockdown in the

State of Kerala from 31.05.2021 to 09.06.2021, subject to the conditions

set out in the said Government Order.

3. As lockdown continues, the difficulty of the litigants/learned

counsel to approach the courts also continue and, therefore, the need to

extend the interim orders.

4. On this aspect, we have heard Mr. K. Gopalakrishna Kurup,

learned Advocate General; Mr. George Poonthottam, learned Senior

Counsel; Mr. Thomas Abraham, President of Kerala High Court

Advocates' Association; Mr. Jawahar Jose, learned counsel for some of the

banks and Mr. Santhosh Mathew, learned counsel for other parties and

representing members of the bar respectively.

5. Mr. George Poonthottam, learned Senior counsel, and Mr. Santhosh

Mathew, learned counsel, submitted that there are matters in which, courts

have granted interim orders on or before 09.04.2021. Due to lockdown, those

matters could not be listed, and thus, the interim orders have to be extended.

He also pointed out that similar is the case with the interim orders passed by

the vacation courts. Learned counsel, therefore, prayed that the interim order

granted on 19.05.2021 be extended to the abovesaid category of cases.

6. Inviting the attention of this Court to paragraphs 7, 8, 36 and 37 of the

interim order dated 19th May, 2021, Mr. Jawahar Jose, learned counsel,

submitted that there is misconception about the implementation of the interim

orders, by the press. On the said aspect, it is clarified that pursuant to the

directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the High Power Committee

constituted for the purpose has taken note of the gravity of the

offences/exemptions to be granted for the purpose of grant of bail to under

trial/remanded prisoners. In the said circumstances, we are of the view that

there is no need to modify the interim orders granted on 19.05.2021, in respect

of the said issue.

7. Inviting our attention to paragraph No.39 of the interim order dated

19.05.2021, Mr. K. Gopalakrishna Kurup, learned Advocate General, submitted

that in the earlier order, interim stay granted was limited upto 31.05.2021 or

till the end of the lockdown period by the Government, whichever is earlier.

Now, the Government have issued G.O.(Rt) No.444/2021/DMD dated 29 th May,

2021, extending the lockdown in the State of Kerala from 31.05.2021 to

09.06.2021. Therefore, this Court may consider modification of the interim

order already granted to have parity with the orders passed now, extending

the interim orders .

8. Considering the submission of the learned Advocate General, in the

matter of interim bails, directed to be extended till 31.05.2021 or till the end of

the lockdown period by the Government, whichever is earlier, taking note of

the Government Order dated 29.05.2021, extending the lockdown in the State

of Kerala from 31st May, 2021 to 9.6.2021, and considering the present pandemic

situation, we hereby add that those interim orders covered under paragraph 39

would be extended upto 15.06.2021.

9. We are also in agreement with the abovesaid submission of Mr. George

Poonthottam, learned Senior Counsel, and Mr. Santhosh Mathew, in the matter

of interim orders granted before and during the vacation. Thus, in the

abovesaid matters, wherever interim orders granted on 09.04.2021, the orders

in force as on the said day, and the interim orders granted during vacation and

expiring in the interregnum, are extended upto 15.06.2021, subject to the

respondents or the concerned, moving the courts for vacating the interim

orders, if so advised till 16.05.2021.

10. While granting interim order on 19.05.2021, we have considered the

difficulty in the matters arising out of the proceedings under Section 138 of the

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, where interim directions are issued for

appearance or payment of certain amounts due under cheques dishonoured.

Today, we have also taken note of the fact that in cases arising out of the

proceedings under Section 138, there can be final judgments, directing

payment of amounts, within a prescribed period, and for appearance of the

parties. In line with the earlier order, we make it clear that, in those cases also,

there would be an interim order not to enforce the final judgment, wherever a

revision petition/appeal could not be filed due to the lock down restrictions.

On the aspect of limitation, parties will get protection under the orders of the

Hon'ble Apex Court.

11. For the reasons aforesaid and having regard to the abovesaid

submissions, the interim orders granted on 19.05.2021 are also extended till

15.06.2021.

12. Registry is directed to post this suo motu writ petition on 14.06.2021.

The Registry is also directed to issue a copy of this order today itself to all

concerned on usual terms.

Sd/-

S. MANIKUMAR CHIEF JUSTICE

Sd/-

C. T. RAVIKUMAR JUDGE

Sd/-

SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE jes

//TRUE COPY//

P.S. To Judge

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter