Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 15772 Ker
Judgement Date : 30 July, 2021
Con.Case(C) No.1893/2020 1/3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
Friday, the 30th day of July 2021 / 8th Sravana, 1943
CONTEMPT CASE(CIVIL) NO. 1893 OF 2020(S) IN WP(C) 12510/2015
PETITIONER:
K.V.MOHANDAS,AGED 71 YEARS,S/O.VELAYUDHAN,KOZHIPARAMBIL
HOUSE,KAIPAMANGALAM P.O.,
THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 681
BY ADVOCATE SMT.DAISY A.PHILIPOSE
RESPONDENT:
JEEVAN BABU K,THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC
INSTRUCTIONS,JAGATHI,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695 001
SRI.SURIN GEORGE IPE,SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR RESPONDENT
This Contempt of court case (civil) having come up for orders on
30.07.2021, the court on the same day passed the following:
PTO
Con.Case(C) No.1893/2020 2/3
SHAJI P.CHALY, J.
===============================
Contempt Case No.1893 of 2020
in
W.P(C) No.12510 of 2015
===============================
Dated this the 30th day of July, 2021
ORDER
On 2nd July, 2021, after taking into account
the fact situations and the number of postings made
in the contempt of court case, it was directed
that, the respondent shall comply with the
directions contained in the judgment and report the
matter before this Court. Such a direction was
issued after taking note of the fact that, an
appeal was filed by the Government against the
judgment with a delay of 411 days.
2. Today when the matter was taken up,
learned Senior Government Pleader Sri.Surin George
Ipe submitted that, eventhough the order was
communicated, there is no response from the
respondent apart from pointing out that in the Con.Case(C) No.1893/2020 3/3
Contempt Case No.1893of 2020 in W.P(C) No.12510 of 2015
delay petition a Division Bench of this Court has
issued notice to the respondent. It was also
pointed out that an urgent memo was also filed for
listing the writ appeal. Whatever that be, the
judgment of this Court is dated 6th November,2019
and this contempt petition was pending before this
Court from 23.11.2020 also. Inspite of sufficient
opportunity provide to the respondent, no serious
action was taken and therefore, direct the
respondent to appear before this Court on
13.08.2021, if the directions in the judgment are
not complied with or in the event of any order
passed by the Division Bench staying the operation
of the directions contained in the judgment.
Sd/-
SHAJI P.CHALY JUDGE hmh
30-07-2021 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!