Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 15763 Ker
Judgement Date : 30 July, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 8TH SRAVANA, 1943
RP NO. 493 OF 2021
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 26612/2020 OF HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, ERNAKULAM
REVIEW PETITIONERS:
1 KERALA WATER AUTHORITY,
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, JALA BHAVAN,
VELLAYAMBALAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033.
2 MANAGING DIRECTOR,
KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALA BHAVAN, VELLAYAMBALAM
P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033.
3 CHIEF ENGINEER (HRD AND GI),
KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALA BHAVAN, VELLAYAMBALAM
P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033.
4 FINANCE MANAGER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER,
OFFICE OF THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA WATER
AUTHORITY, FINANCE WING, JALA BHAVAN, VELLAYAMBALAM
P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033.
5 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER INVESTIGATION PLANNING AND
DESIGN DIVISION,
KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, KOCHI-682 018.
6 ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER INVESTIGATION PLANNING
AND DESIGN SUB DIVISION,
KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, KOCHI-682 018.
BY ADV SMT.MARY BENJAMIN, KSCSCST
RESPONDENTS:
1 GOPALAKRISHNA PILLAI K.R.,
AGED 63 YEARS
S/O. THE LATE RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, ASSISTANT
ENGINEER, (RETIRED), I INVESTIGATION PLANNING AND
DESIGN SECTION III, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY,
CEMETARY JUNCTION, KOCHI, RESIDING AT KIZHAKKAYIL
HOUSE, KOLAPRA, KUDAYATHOOR P.O., THODUPUZHA,
RP NO. 493 OF 2021 2
IDUKKI DISTRICT-685 590.
2 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES
(WATER SUPPLY -B) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT
SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
SRI. SUNIL KUMAR KURIAKOSE - GP
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
30.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
RP NO. 493 OF 2021 3
ORDER
This petition for review has been filed seeking
that the direction in the judgment, to pay interest
at the rate of 9% on the amount of DCRG payable to
the writ petitioner, be vacated and the petitioners
assert that the delay in payment of the same has
been occurred solely on account of the COVID-19
pandemic restrictions.
2. Smt.Mary Benjamin, learned counsel
appearing for the review petitioners, submitted
that reliefs were granted to the writ petitioner
based on a Full Bench decision of this Court in
Chandran v. Local Self Government Department [2020
(5) KLT 669 (FB)], but that this judgment has been
now stayed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court; however,
adding that, in the meanwhile, the Water Authority
has paid eligible DCRG to the writ petitioner and
does not intend to recover the same, in any manner,
whatsoever in deference to the orders of this
Court. She, therefore, reiteratingly prayed that
the order for interest be vacated.
3. I find substantial force in the
submissions of Smt.Mary Benjamin and am, therefore,
of the view that since the full amount of DCRG has
already been paid to the writ petitioner by the
review petitioners, the direction to pay interest
for the delay would not be now necessary.
In the afore circumstances, I review the
judgment dated 14.12.2020 to the limited extent of
vacating the order to pay interest at the rate of
9% per annum.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE MC/4.8
APPENDIX OF RP 493/2021
PETITIONER ANNEXURE
Annexure R1(A) TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RECEIPT DATED 12.07.2021.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!