Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 15461 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 July, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
FRIDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JULY 2021 / 1ST SRAVANA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 25268 OF 2014
PETITIONER/S:
THE PARAVUR S.N.V. REGIONAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.
NO.1685, S.PARAVUR P.O., KOLLAM 691 301, REPRESENTED BY
ITS PRESIDENT.
BY ADVS.
SRI.B.SURESH KUMAR
SMT.ANUROOPA JAYADEVAN
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE CO-
OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, FORT P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 023.
2 THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, FORT
P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 023.
3 THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES GENERAL
OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
CIVIL STATION, KOLLAM 691 013.
4 THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
(GENERAL) OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-
OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, NEAR CIVIL STATION,
KOLLAM 691 013.
5 THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, URBAN BANKS
DEPARTMENT, RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, FORT P.O,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 023.
BY ADV SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI
SMT.MABLE C. KURIAN, GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
23.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO.25268/2014
2
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
-------------------------------
W.P.(C)No.25268 of 2014
--------------------------------
Dated this the 23rd day of July 2021
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is a regional co-operative
bank. As per Ext.P1, the petitioner registered
on 19.11.1927 as Paravur Sree Narayana Vilasom
mutual help bank in Kollam Taluk. Subsequently
it is changed as S.N.V. Regional Co-operative
Bank in the year 1956. According to the
petitioner, the Reserve Bank of India directed
the petitioner to change the category of the
bank as Primary Agricultural Credit Society.
According to the petitioner as per Exts.P3 and
P4 amendment of the bye-law, the category is
changed to Primary Agricultural Credit Society.
Subsequently, the petitioner submitted an
application for licence as per the Banking
Regulations Act, 1949. That was rejected as
per Ext.P5 order by the RBI. The petitioner WP(C) NO.25268/2014
subsequently submitted Ext.P6 representation
which was also dismissed as per Ext.P7 order.
Aggrieved by Exts.P5 and P7 orders of the RBI,
this writ petition is filed.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for
the petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel
appearing for the RBI and the learned
Government Pleader also.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner
submitted that as per the judgment of the Apex
Court in Pandurang Ganpati Chaugule v.
Vishwasrao Patil Murgud Sahakari Bank Ltd.
[2020(2)KHC 664] and the subsequent amendment
to the Banking Regulations Act, the petitioner
can apply for a licence. The learned counsel
submitted that Exts.P5 and P7 orders passed by
the RBI is illegal and unsustainable.
4. The learned Standing counsel appearing
for the RBI submitted that there is nothing
wrong in Exts.P5 and P7 as on the date on which
it is passed. The learned Standing counsel WP(C) NO.25268/2014
submitted that, if a fresh application is filed
for licence, the same will be considered in
accordance to law.
5. According to me, in the light of the
subsequent events, especially the amendment in
the Banking Regulations Act and also the
judgment of the Apex Court in Pandurang's
case(supra) there can be a direction to the
petitioner to file a fresh application for
license as per the Banking Regulations Act.
There can be a further direction to the RBI to
consider the same in accordance to law
untrammeled by any observation in Exts.P5 and
P7 orders and also in the light of the judgment
of the Apex Court in Pandurang's case(supra).
6. Therefore this writ petition is
disposed in the following manner:
(i) The petitioner is free to file a
fresh application for licence within one month
from the date of receipt of a copy of this
judgment.
WP(C) NO.25268/2014
(ii) If such an application is received
by the 5th respondent, the 5th respondent will
consider the same untrammeled by any
observation in Exts.P5 and P7 orders and also
in the light of the subsequent amendment in the
Banking Regulations Act and also the dictum
laid down by the Apex Court in Pandurang's
case(supra).
(iii) The above exercise should be
completed by the 5th respondent as expeditiously
as possible, at any rate, within five months
from the date of receipt of a copy of the
licence application.
SD/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE
DM WP(C) NO.25268/2014
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 25268/2014
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
P1: A TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 19/11/1927 ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR, TRAVANCORE MUTUAL HELP SOCIETY
P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT C.C.491/2010 DATED 23/4/2010 FILED BY THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA BEFORE THE MUNSIFF MAGISTRATE COURT, PARAVUR.
P3: A TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 16/12/2011 CLASSIFYING THE SOCIETY AS PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY ISSUED BY THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL)
P4: A TRUE COPY OF THE AMENDMENT TO BE CARRIED OUT BY THE SOCIETY DATED 25/11/2011 ISSUED BY THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL)
P5:A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNCATION DATED 3/3/2014 ISSUED TO THE SOCIETY BY THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
P6: A TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 29/5/2014 ISSUED TO THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, URBAN BANK DEPARTMENT, RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, BY THE SOCIETY
P7: A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 31/7/2014 ISSUED TO THE SOCIETY BY THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS
EXT.R5A: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DT.21.12.2007 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER
EXT.R5B: TRUE COPY OF THE PUBLIC NOTICE DT.27.12.2007 PUBLISHED IN HINDU DAILY
EXT.R5C: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DT.27.12.2007 PUBLISHED IN MALAYALA MANORAMA DAILY
EXT.R5D: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DT.27.12.2007 PUBLISHED IN MATHRUBHUMI DAILY
EXT.R5E: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.1685/R1/07-08 DT.9.1.2008 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER WP(C) NO.25268/2014
EXT.R5F: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DT.14.1.2008 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT
EXT.R5G: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DT.9.4.2008 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT
EXT.R5H: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.G1/1685/3/07-08 DT.5.5.2008 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER
EXT.R5I: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DT.1.7.2008 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT
EXT.R5J: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DT.20.8.2008 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT
EXT.R5K: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.E1/09 DT.11.7.2009 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER ALONG WITH ITS ENCLOSURES
EXT.R5L: TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DT.16.12.2011 ISSUED BY THE CO-OPERATIVE JOINT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), KOLLAM
EXT.R5M: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.67/2014 DATED 29.5.2014 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER
EXT.R5N: TRUE COPY OF THE AUDITED BALANCE SHEET, DT.28.2.2007
//TRUE COPY//
PA TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!