Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chandran vs The Union Of India
2021 Latest Caselaw 14842 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14842 Ker
Judgement Date : 15 July, 2021

Kerala High Court
Chandran vs The Union Of India on 15 July, 2021
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
                 THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BADAR
     THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 24TH ASHADHA, 1943
                       WP(C) NO. 12795 OF 2021
PETITIONER:

          CHANDRAN,
          AGED 65 YEARS
          S/O. AYYAPPAN KUTTY, PANAMBUKATTUCHIRA, PERUMBALAM,
          ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT 688 570.

          BY ADV P.ANOOP (MULAVANA)



RESPONDENTS:

    1     THE UNION OF INDIA,
          REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, MINSTER Y OF EXTERNAL
          AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI 110 001.

    2     THE REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER,
          REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICE, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, KOCHI,
          KERALA 682 036.

          BY ADV SHRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR, ASG OF INDIA




     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
15.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 12795 OF 2021
                                      2

                               JUDGMENT

Heard both sides. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits

that the petitioner wants to attend marriage of his son in the UAE and

the respondents are not issuing passport to him because a crime

no.98/2019 under section 55(1) of the Abkari Act is registered against

him and a criminal case is pending against him in the Court of the

learned Judicial First Class Magistrate Court - II, Cherthala. In view of

judgment of this Court in Criminal Miscellaneous case No.2695/2021,

Ext.P4 between Arun Baby and State of Kerala and Another, petitioner is

not required to obtain No Objection Certificate from the concerned Court

of the Judicial First Class Magistrate.

2. The ASGI submits that on own admission of the petitioner,

criminal case is pending against him in the Court of Judicial First Class

Magistrate Court and therefore, it becomes incumbent on his part to

apply for 'No Objection' for travelling abroad to the concerned Court.

3. I have considered the submissions so advanced. Ruling of this

Court in Criminal Miscellaneous case No.2695/2021 is not applicable to

the facts of this case. In that matter, this Court has exercised power

under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In the said case,

the petitioner therein was being prosecuted for offences punishable WP(C) NO. 12795 OF 2021

under Section 498A and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner

therein had not applied to the concerned Court for permission to travel

abroad. However, he had moved a petition under Section 482 of the

Cr.PC before this Court. While allowing that matter, this Court has

observed that considering the nature of prosecution against the

petitioner therein, there is no need for the prosecution witnesses to

identify the said petitioner as offender. In that case, the petitioner

therein undertook to appear before the Trial Court on all hearing dates

as may be directed by the said Court. In this view of the matter, this

Court instead of relegating the petitioner to the concerned criminal Court

for seeking permission to apply for issuance of passport, and for granting

No Objection Certificate to visit the foreign country, had itself, in

exercise of powers under Section 482 of the Cr.PC granted permission to

the petitioner to travel abroad for employment purpose on the condition

that he shall file an undertaking in the form of an affidavit in the Court of

the concerned Magistrate to the effect that he would appear before that

Court as and when required by the Court. Such is not the case in hand.

In the instant case, the petitioner has applied this Court for a writ under

Article 226 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to the respondent -

Passport Authority to consider his application for issuance of a new

passport and for directing the 2nd respondent to issue a fresh passport to

the petitioner for a period of six months.

WP(C) NO. 12795 OF 2021

In the light of these facts, the judgment of this Court in Criminal

Miscellaneous case No. 2695/2021 is of no avail to the petitioner.

The petition is accordingly dismissed. The petitioner is at liberty to

approach the respondents for the same relief by getting necessary

permission from the concerned court of JFCM.

Nsd                                                  sd/-


                                                A.M.BADAR
                                                   JUDGE
 WP(C) NO. 12795 OF 2021


                      APPENDIX OF WP(C) 12795/2021

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1              TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED
                        08.02.2021.

Exhibit P2              TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED
                        23.02.2021.

Exhibit P3              TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED
                        12.05.2021.

Exhibit P4              TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HONBLE
                        COURT IN CRL.M.C. NO. 2695 OF 2021 DATED
                        11.06.2021.

//true copy//

PA to Judge
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter