Sunday, 07, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Radhakrishna Pillai vs State Of Kerala
2021 Latest Caselaw 13514 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13514 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 July, 2021

Kerala High Court
Radhakrishna Pillai vs State Of Kerala on 1 July, 2021
WP(C) NO. 4300 OF 2021         1

            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                              PRESENT
        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
    THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JULY 2021 / 10TH ASHADHA, 1943
                     WP(C) NO. 4300 OF 2021
PETITIONER/S:

    1     RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI
          AGED 59 YEARS
          S/O.LATE BHASKARAN PILLAI, PULLAMPALLIL-KRISHNAHARI,
          KUNNATHUR EAST P.O., KUNNATHUR VILLAGE, SASTHAMKOTTA,
          KOLLAM - 690 540

    2     VASANTHI AMMA
          AGED 78 YEARS
          W/O.LATE BHASKARAN PILLAI, PULLAMPALLIL,
          KUNNATHUR EAST P.O., KUNNATHUR VILLAGE,
          SASTHAMKOTTA, KOLLAM 690 540

          BY ADV B.MOHANLAL



RESPONDENT/S:

    1     STATE OF KERALA
          REP.BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
          REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.

    2     THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
          COLLECTORATE, CUTCHERY P.O., KOLLAM 691 019

    3     THE TAHASILDAR
          TALUK OFFICE, KUNNATHUR P.O., KOLLAM 690 519

    4     THE VILLAGE OFFICER
          KUNNATHUR VILLAGE, KUNNATHUR P.O., KOLLAM 690 519

    5     THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
          PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, BEACH ROAD, KOLLAM 691 001.

    6     THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
           PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, KARUNAGAPPALLY,
          KARUNAGAPPALLY P.O., KOLLAM 690 518
 WP(C) NO. 4300 OF 2021         2



    7     THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER
          PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, SASTHAMCOTTAH,
          SASTHAMCOTTAH P.O., KOLLAM 690 520

    8     THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
          PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, KOTTARAKKARA, KOTTARAKKARA
          P.O., KOLLAM 691 546.




          SMT VIDHYA A.C, GP




     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
01.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 4300 OF 2021                3

                                   JUDGMENT

The 1st petitioner is the son of the 2nd petitioner. The petitioners state

that the 1st petitioner is the owner in title, possession and enjoyment of 1.40

Ares of property comprised in Re-Sy.No.400/16 in Block No.16 of the

Kunnathoor Village. It is on the strength of Settlement Deed No.4472/1995 of

the Sasthamcotta Sub Registry that he obtained title over the property. He has

effected mutation in his favour and has been paying tax as evident from

Exhibit-P1. Late Sri Bhaskaran, the husband of the 2nd petitioner was the

absolute owner in title and possession of property having an extent of 8.19

Ares, falling in Re-Sy.No.400/5 in Block No.16 of the Kunnathoor Village. He

assigned a portion of his property to his son Sri Sivasankara Pillai, and he was

left with 6.67 Ares, which is now being enjoyed by the 2nd petitioner as the

wife and legal heir. To substantiate the said fact, the petitioners rely on Exhibit

P1(a) receipt.

2. The petitioners contend that the respondents are now asserting

that the petitioners have encroached upon road poramboke and put up

constructions. According to the petitioners there is not even a speck of truth in

the said allegation. When steps were taken to demolish the constructions put

up by the petitioners, the 1st respondent lodged Ext.P5 complaint before the

higher authorities. However no action was taken. It is contended that the

petitioners and their family are under a threat of eviction and demolition of the

structures put up by them in the properties covered under Exts.P1 and P2. It

is in the afore circumstances that they have approached this Court seeking the

following reliefs:

i) To call for the records leading to the proceedings from the Respondents 5 to 8 and issue a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the proceedings of the Respondents to evict the petitioners from 1.40 and 6.67 Ares of property comprised in Re- Sy.No.400/16 and 400/5 in Block No.16 of Kunnathur Village and to demolish the Building No:13/674, 13/693, 13/661, 13/662, 13/663, 13/664 and No:13/659 of Kunnathur Grama Panchayath covered as per Ext.P1 to P2(a).

ii) to issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate order or direction commanding the Respondents not to evict the petitioners from 1.40 and 6.67 Ares of property comprised in Re-Sy.No:400/16 and 400/5 in Block No:16 of Kunnathur Village and not to demolish the Building No:13/674, 13/693, 13/661, 13/662, 13/663, 13/664 and No:13/659 of Kunnathur Grama Panchayath covered as per Ext.P1 to P2(a).

iii) To declare that the petitioners are entitled to continue occupation and enjoyment of 1.40 and 6.67 Ares of property comprised in Re-Sy No:400/16 and 400/5 in Block No:16 of Kunnathur Village and the Building No:13/674, 13/693, 13/661, 13/662, 13/663, 13/664 and No:13/659 of Kunnathur Grama Panchayath covered as per Ext.P1 to P2(a).

iv) To issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate order or direction commanding the Respondents 6 and 8 to consider and dispose of Ext.P5 within a stipulated time as directed by this Hon'ble Court and not to evict the petitioners from 1.40 and 6.67 Ares of property comprised in Re-Sy No:400/16 and 400/5 in Block No:16 of Kunnathur village and not to demolish the Building No:13/674, 13/693, 13/661, 13/662, 13/663, 13/664 and No:13/659 of Kunnathur Grama Panchayath covered as per Ext.P1 to P2(a)

3. As directed by this Court, a statement has been filed by the 8th

respondent. It is stated that the petitioners are residing on the sides of the

Kottarakkara - Sasthamcotta Road, the widening of which has been included in

the KIFBI Project of 2016-2017. As part of road widening, a survey was

conducted by the Tahsildar, Kunnathoor and the road boundary was

demarcated and survey stones were planted. Immediately thereafter, the

encroachers were put on notice and they were shown the actual boundary and

the extent of encroachment carried out by them. It is further stated that when

the property of the petitioners was surveyed and demarcated by the 3rd

respondent, it was noticed that the petitioners had constructed car porch and

had extended their building portions to the road puramboke. In paragraph 6

of the Statement, it is stated thus:

"It is submitted that, as survey was conducted in the year, 2019 the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue necessary directions to Revenue Authorities to demarcate the boundary of the said portion of PWD Road "Kottarakkara - Sasthamkotta after issuing notice to the encroachers and effected (sic). This respondent will evict encroachment only in accordance with the provisions of Kerala Highway Protection Act & Kerala Land Conservancy Act, 1919"

4. I have considered the submissions advanced. Admittedly, no

notice has been issued to the petitioners either under the Highway Protection

Act or under the Land Conservancy Act. Now that the respondents have

undertaken in their statement that a fresh survey would be conducted in the

presence of the petitioners taking note of their title deeds and other records, I

am of the view that necessary directions can be issued so that the entire

controversy is resolved.

Resultantly, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:

(a) Within a period of two weeks from today, notice shall be issued to

the petitioners and the affected parties, if any, by the 3rd respondent

informing the specific date on which their property would be measured

to ascertain whether the petitioners have encroached upon the road

puramboke and put up structures.

(b) The petitioners shall produce their title deeds, possession

certificates, site plan, sketch etc. which was submitted by them at the

time of construction of the building.

(c) The respondents shall conduct a survey and demarcate the

property on the strength of the revenue records and survey plan after

perusing the records made available by the petitioners. The entire

exercise shall be completed within a period of two months. If it is

found that the petitioners have encroached upon portions of road

puramboke, the respondents shall issue appropriate notice under the

relevant statute and proceed strictly in adherence with law.

Sd/-

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V JUDGE IAP

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 4300/2021

PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED 26.6.2020 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT IN RESPECT OF THE PROPERTY OF THE 1ST PETITIONER FOR THE PERIOD 2020-2021

EXHIBIT P1(A) THE TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED 1.7.2020 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND PETITIONER FOR THE PERIOD 2020-2021 IN RESPECT OF THE PROPERTY.

EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING TAX RECEIPT DATED 14.2.2021 ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY, KUNNATHUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH TO THE 1ST PETITIONER, FOR THE PERIOD 2020-2021

EXHIBIT P2 (A) THE TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING TAX RECEIPT DATED 21.1.2021 ISSUED BY KUNNATHUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH TO THE 2ND PETITIONER, IN THE NAME OF HER HUSBAND SRI. BHASKARAN PILLAI.

EXHIBIT P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 11/6/2018 ISSUED BY THE BRANCH MANAGER, S.B.I., KOTTARAKKARA TO THE 1ST PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P4          THE TRUE PHOTOGRAPH OF THE BUILDING OF THE
                    PETITIONERS HAVING ACCESS TO THE P.W.D ROAD
                    KOTTARAKKARA BHARANIKAVU SASTHAMCOTTAH

EXHIBIT P5          THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED
                    13.2.2021 FILED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER
                    BEFORE THE MINISTER FOR P.W.D. AND THE
                    RESPONDENTS 5 TO 8 AND ITS POSTAL RECEIPTS.




RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:NIL
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter