Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Viswambharan vs State Of Kerala
2021 Latest Caselaw 991 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 991 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2021

Kerala High Court
K.Viswambharan vs State Of Kerala on 11 January, 2021
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

     MONDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 21TH POUSHA, 1942

                      WP(C).No.33022 OF 2011(C)


PETITIONER:

               K.VISWAMBHARAN, AGED 51 YEARS, S/O.K.KRISHNAN,
               RESIDING AT KEEZHE PUTHENVILAKATHU, VEEDU, PALLICHAL,
               GANDHI NAGAR, NARUVAMOODU P.O,, PALLICHAL VILLAGE,
               THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN 695 020.

               BY ADV. SRI.D.ROBINSON

RESPONDENTS:

      1        STATE OF KERALA
               REP.BY ITS SECRETARY SCHEDULED CASTE DEPARTMENT,
               SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

      2        THE AGENCY FOR NON-CONVENTIONAL ENERGY
               AND RURAL TECHNOLOGY (ANERT) REP.BY ITS DIRECTOR
               CUM MEMBER SECRETARY, PATTOM PALACE,
               THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

               SRI. SUNIL KUMAR KURIAKOSE - GP

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD         ON
11.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C).No.33022 OF 2011(C)

                                         2


                                   JUDGMENT

Dated this the 11th day of January 2021

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a

permanent appointment as driver in the services of the second

respondent and to quash the appointment of a certain

Sri.Satheesan.

I notice that this matter has been pending before this Court

for the last more than nine years without being admitted and

without any orders being issued. In fact, the proceedings dated

14.12.2011 show that the petitioner sought time but did not move

this writ petition further again.

I am, therefore, of the firm view that this writ petition has

now become infructuous.

I, therefore, close it for such reason; however, leaving

liberty to the petitioner to seek a rehearing, if it is so necessary.




                                               Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

    Stu                                                 JUDGE
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter