Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 967 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
MONDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 21TH POUSHA, 1942
Crl.MC.No.703 OF 2020(G)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN SC 239/2011 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS
MAGISTRATE COURT, PARAVUR
CRIME NO.1332/2010 OF Paravoor Police Station , Kollam
PETITIONER:
SAJAD
AGED 32 YEARS
S/O. JAMALUDHEEN, M.N MANZIL, THEKKUMBAGAM CHERRY,
KOTTAPPURAM VILLAGE, KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI.M.R.SASITH
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN 682 013
2 THE SUB INSPECTOR
PARAVOOR POLICE STATION,KOLLAM,PIN 683513
3 NISAD
S/O SAJITH,NISAMANZIL,THEKKUMBHAGAM
CHERRY,KOTTAPPURAM VILLAGE,691503
Addl.4 SHOUKATHALI,
AGED 80
YEARS,MUHAMMEDN00HU,NIZAMANZIL,THEKKUMBHAGOM,PARAVOOR
KOLLAM,PIN 691503
Addl.5 NAJMILNIZA,
D/O HABSABEEVI,AGED
49,NIZAMANZIL,THEKKUMBHAGOM,PARAVOOR,KOLLAM,691503
Addl.respondents impleaded as per order dated
16.11.2020 in Crl.M.A.1 of 2020.
R4-5 BY ADV. SHRI.RANJITH E N
SR.PP.C.S.HRITHWIK
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
11.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crmc 703/2020 2
V.G.ARUN, J.
===========================
Crl.M.C.No.703 of 2020
===========================
Dated this the 11th day of January, 2021
ORDER
Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.1332 of 2010
registered at the Paravur Police Station for the offence punishable
under Sections 324, 294(b) and 451 of IPC, now pending as
S.C.No.239 of 2011 of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Paravur.
The de facto complainants at whose instance the crime was
registered are respondents 3, 4 and 5. Annexure A3 affidavit
has been filed by the 3rd respondent, Annexure 4 by the 4th
respondent and Annexure 5 by the 5th respondent stating that
the dispute has been settled and that they have no subsisting
grievance against the petitioner.
2. Heard the learned Public Prosecutor also, who, on
instructions, submits that the petitioner has no criminal
antecedents.
3. Having considered the gravity of the offences alleged,
nature of the injury caused and having perused the affidavit filed
by the respondents 3, 4 and 5, the contents of which are
submitted to be true and voluntary, I am satisfied that the
dispute is settled and that no public interest is involved in this
matter. Moreover, in view of the settlement, possibility of the
criminal proceedings ending in conviction is remote. As such,
continuance of the proceedings will amount to an abuse of
process of court and hence, in view of the legal position set out
by the Honourable Supreme Court in Madan Mohan Abbot v.
State of Punjab [(2008) 4 SCC 582] and Gian Singh v. State
of Punjab and another [(2012) 10 SCC 303], there is no
impediment in granting the relief sought.
4. In the result, this Crl.M.C is allowed. The proceedings in
S.C.No.239 of 2011 of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Paravur is
quashed.
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN JUDGE
lgk
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.
1332/2010 OF PARAVOOR POLICE STATION, KOLLAM
ANNEXURE A2 CERTIFIED COPY OF FINAL REPORT SUBMITTED BEFORE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, PARAVOOR
ANNEXURE A3 TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
ANNEXURE 4 ATTESTED COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 12.3.2020 FILED BY R4
ANNEXURE 5 ATTESTED COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 12.3.2020 FILED BY R5
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!