Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 632 Ker
Judgement Date : 7 January, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
THURSDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 17TH POUSHA, 1942
RCRev..No.395 OF 2018
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN RCA NO.8 OF 2016 DATED 17.11.2017 OF THE
RENT CONTROL APPELLATE AUTHORITY, KASARAGOD REVERSING THE ORDER OF
THE RENT CONTROL COURT, HOSDURG IN RCP NO.42 OF 2013 DATED
31.3.2016
REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
T.V. BHASKARAN
AGED 69 YEARS
S/O. T.V.KARTHUNHI,TAILOR,R/AT
NHANIKKADAVU,OZHINJAVALAPPU, NILESHWARAM VILLAGE,
HOSDURG TALUK
BY ADVS.
SRI.A.ARUNKUMAR
SRI.VIPIN T JOSE
RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
T.V. NARAYANAN
AGED 60 YEARS
S/O. T.V.KORAN, THONATH VALAPPIL, KURUNTHUR, PADNEKAD
P.O., KANHANGAD VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK-671 315
R1 BY ADV. SRI.SURESH KUMAR KODOTH
R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.P.ANTONY BINU
THIS RENT CONTROL REVISION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
07.01.2021, ALONG WITH RCRev..352/2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
RCRev.395 & 352/2018 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
THURSDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 17TH POUSHA, 1942
RCRev..No.352 OF 2018
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN RCA NO.7 OF 2016 DATED 17.11.2017 OF THE
RENT CONTROL APPELLATE AUTHORITY, KASARAGOD REVERSING THE ORDER
OF THE RENT CONTROL COURT, HOSDURG IN RCP NO.9 OF 2014 DATED
30.3.2016
REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
P.ABDUL RAHIMAN
AGED 52 YEARS
S/O HASSAINAR, RESIDING AT NHANIKKADAVU,
OZHINHAVALAPPU, NILESWARAM VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK.
BY ADVS.
SRI.A.ARUNKUMAR
SRI.VIPIN T JOSE
RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/RESPONDENT:
T.V.NARAYANAN
AGED 60 YEARS
S/O T.V KORAN, THINATH VALAPPIL, KURUNTHUR,
PADNEKAD.P.O, KANHANGAD VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK-
671315
R1 BY ADV. SRI.SURESH KUMAR KODOTH
R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.P.ANTONY BINU
THIS RENT CONTROL REVISION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
07.01.2021, ALONG WITH RCRev..395/2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME
DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
RCRev.395 & 352/2018 3
JUDGMENT
[ RCRev..395/2018, RCRev..352/2018 ]
Dated this the 7th day of January 2021 ..
Heard the learned counsel on both sides in the
above Revision Petitions.
2. The learned counsel for the Revision
Petitioners submitted that, the tenants have
surrendered the tenanted premises to the respondent-
landlord in both the cases and, therefore, the matter
has become infructuous.
Hence, the above Revision Petitions are dismissed
as infructuous.
Sd/-
A.HARIPRASAD
JUDGE
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
pkk JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!