Kerala High Court
Kunhamina vs Kunhamina on 7 January, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
THURSDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 17TH POUSHA, 1942
OP(C).No.1760 OF 2020
AGAINST THE ORDER IN OS 270/2004 DATED 08-10-2020 OF MUNSIFF
COURT, OTTAPPALAM
PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 5:
1 KUNHAMINA, AGED 66 YEARS
W/O. LATE MOHAMMADALI HAJI, KUNNAPPULLY, LAKKIDI
AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK,
PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
2 MUKHARI FIROZ, AGED 50 YEARS
S/O. LATE MOHAMMADALI HAJI, KUNNAPPULLY, LAKKIDI
AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK,
PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
3 NOUSHAD, AGED 46 YEARS
S/O. LATE MOHAMMADALI HAJI, KUNNAPPULLY, LAKKIDI
AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK,
PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
4 ABDUL NASAR, AGED 40 YEARS
S/O. LATE MOHAMMADALI HAJI, KUNNAPPULLY, LAKKIDI
AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK,
PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
5 ANWAR SADATH, AGED 40 YEARS
S/O. LATE MOHAMMADALI HAJI, KUNNAPPULLY, LAKKIDI
AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK,
PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
SRI.P.JAYARAM
SHRI. GIGI PAPPACHAN
SHRI.AKHIL P
RESPONDENTS:
1 T.K.SREENIVASAN, AGED 85 YEARS
S/O. LATE T. S. KRISHANA IYER, THANIPPATTA MADATHIL,
OTTAPALAM AMSOM, ARIYOOR THEKKMURI DESOM, OTTAPALAM
P. O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 679 101.
OP(C).No.1760 OF 2020
2
2 SAKKEER HUSSAIN, AGED 43 YEARS
S/O. LATE MOHAMMADALI HAJI, 7TH CROSS ROAD,
CHANGAPUZHA NAGAR P. O., KOCHI -33.
3 ASMA BEEBI, AGED 51 YEARS
W/O. N. A. BASHEER AHAMMED, ASMABI MANZIL, GODOWN
ROAD, EDAPPALLI TOLL P. O., KOCHI - 24.
4 SHAKKEELA, AGED 42 YEARS
W/O. BAVA MOHAMMED, KOTTUKKAL HOUSE, KANJIRAKKODE
P. O., VADAKKAMCHERI, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 582.
5 RUKKIYA, AGED 65 YEARS
D/O. LATE MUKHARI, KUNNAPPULLY, LAKKIDI AMSOM,
THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, LAKKIDI P.
O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 679 301.
6 AMINA, AGED 58 YEARS
D/O. LATE MUKHARI, KUNNAPPULLY, LAKKIDI AMSOM,
THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, LAKKIDI P.
O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 679 301.
7 SULAIMAN, AGED 56 YEARS
S/O. LATE MUKHARI, KUNNAPPULLY, LAKKIDI AMSOM,
THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, LAKKIDI P.
O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 679 301.
8 MOHHAMMED SUDHEER, AGED 38 YEARS
S/O. LATE MOHAMMADALI HAJI, KUNNAPPULLI, LAKKIDI
AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK,
LAKKIDI P. O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 679 301.
9 SHERIF HUSSAIN, AGED 50 YEARS
S/O. LATE PATHUMMA @ MUTHU, D/O. LATE MUKHARI,
KUNNAPPULLI, LAKKIDI AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM,
OTTAPALAM TALUK, LAKKIDI P. O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT -
679 301.
10 NAZEER HUSSAIN, AGED 49 YEARS
S/O. LATE PATHUMMA @ MUTHU, D/O. LATE MUKHARI,
KUNNAPPULLI, LAKKIDI AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM,
OTTAPALAM TALUK, LAKKIDI P. O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT -
679 301.
11 ISHAK HUSSAIN, AGED 47 YEARS
S/O. LATE PATHUMMA @ MUTHU, D/O. LATE MUKHARI,
KUNNAPPULLI, LAKKIDI AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM,
OP(C).No.1760 OF 2020
3
OTTAPALAM TALUK, LAKKIDI P. O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT -
679 301.
12 YAKOOB HUSSAIN, AGED 47 YEARS
S/O. LATE PATHUMMA @ MUTHU, D/O. LATE MUKHARI,
KUNNAPPULLI, LAKKIDI AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM,
OTTAPALAM TALUK, LAKKIDI P. O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT -
679 301.
13 SABITH HUSSAIN, AGED 47 YEARS
S/O. LATE PATHUMMA @ MUTHU, D/O. LATE MUKHARI,
KUNNAPPULLI, LAKKIDI AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM,
OTTAPALAM TALUK, LAKKIDI P. O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT -
679 301.
14 SIDHIQ HUSSAIN, AGED 47 YEARS
S/O. LATE PATHUMMA @ MUTHU, D/O. LATE MUKHARI,
KUNNAPPULLI, LAKKIDI AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM,
OTTAPALAM TALUK, LAKKIDI P. O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT -
679 301.
15 AFSAL HUSSAIN, AGED 47 YEARS
S/O. LATE PATHUMMA @ MUTHU, D/O. LATE MUKHARI,
KUNNAPPULLI, LAKKIDI AMSOM, THEKKUMANGALAM DESOM,
OTTAPALAM TALUK, LAKKIDI P. O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT -
679 301.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.S.SHYAM
THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07.01.2021,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
OP(C).No.1760 OF 2020
4
Sathish Ninan, J.
==============================
O.P.(C) No.1760 of 2020
==========================
Dated this the 07th day of January, 2021
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to
withdraw the original petition without prejudice to his
rights to file an appeal against the order impugned in terms
of Order 43 Rule 1 CPC. Permission granted. Original
petition dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
Sathish Ninan, Judge
vdv
OP(C).No.1760 OF 2020
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S.NO.270/2004,
ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPALAM.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT
SUBMITTED BY DEFENDANTS 1 TO 3, 5 AND 6 IN
O.S.NO.270/2004, ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF
COURT, OTTAPALAM.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT AND PLANS DATED
14.10.2008 FILED BY ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER
IN I.A.NO.2431/2006 IN O.S.NO.270/2004, ON
THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPALAM.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22.01.2013 IN
I.A.NO.3187/2012 AND I.A.NO.3188/2012 IN
O.S.NO.270/2004, ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF
COURT, OTTAPALAM REMITTING THE
COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND PLAN.
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT AND PLAN DATED
20.02.2015 FILED BY ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER
IN I.A.NO.3188/2012 IN O.S.NO.270/2004, ON
THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPALAM.
EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE
DEFENDANTS IN I.A.NO.3357/2015 IN
O.S.NO.270/2004, ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF
COURT, OTTAPALAM TO REMIT EXHIBIT P5 REPORT
AND PLAN OF THE COMMISSIONER.
EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER STATEMENT FILED ON
BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF IN I.A.NO.3357/2015
IN O.S.NO.270/2004, ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF
COURT, OTTAPALAM OPPOSING THE APPLICATION
TO REMIT THE COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND
PLAN.
EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTIONS SUBMITTED
AGAINST THE COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND PLAN
DATED 28.02.2015 BY THE DEFENDANTS 1,2,3,5
AND 6.
EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTIONS SUBMITTED
OP(C).No.1760 OF 2020
AGAINST THE COMMISSIONER'S REPORT AND PLAN
DATED 28.02.2015 ON BEHALF OF THE
PLAINTIFF.
EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22.06.2020 IN
I.A.NO.3357/2015 IN O.S.NO.270/2004, ON THE
FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPALAM REMITTING
THE REPORT OF THE COMMISSIONER.
EXHIBIT P11 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 21.07.2020
SHOWING PAYMENT OF COMMISSIONER'S BATHA IN
O.S.NO.270/2004, ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF
COURT, OTTAPALAM.
EXHIBIT P12 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 17.07.2020
SHOWING PAYMENT OF BATHA TO DISTRICT SURVEY
SUPERINTENDENT.
EXHIBIT P13 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVIEW,
I.A.NO.1438/2020 IN O.S.NO.270/2004, ON THE
FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPALAM TO REVIEW
EXHIBIT P10 ORDER FILED BY THE PLAINTIFF.
EXHIBIT P14 TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER STATEMENT FILED BY
DEFENDANTS 1 TO 3, 5 AND 6 IN THE
APPLICATION TO REVIEW FILED BY THE
PLAINTIFF I.A.NO.1438/2020 IN
O.S.NO.270/2004, ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF
COURT, OTTAPALAM.
EXHIBIT P15 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 08.10.2020 IN
I.A.NO.1438/2020 IN O.S.NO.270/2004, ON THE
FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPALAM.
