Wednesday, 15, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Neethivedi' vs State Of Kerala
2021 Latest Caselaw 479 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 479 Ker
Judgement Date : 7 January, 2021

Kerala High Court
Neethivedi' vs State Of Kerala on 7 January, 2021
W.P.(C) No. 9148/2010                 : 1:


                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                  PRESENT

              THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR

                                     &

                  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY

       THURSDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 17TH POUSHA, 1942

                          WP(C).No.9148 OF 2010(S)

PETITIONER:
                NEETHIVEDI', REP. BY PRESIDENT V.T.KUMAR
                AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.THOLEN, RESIDING AT, VALAMVAYAL,
                VAZHAVATTA, KALPATTA, WAYANAD.

                BY ADVS.
                SRI.A.X.VARGHESE
                SRI.A.V.JOJO
RESPONDENTS:
      1      STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY CHIEF SECRETARY,
             SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
      2      STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY
             PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHEDULED CASTE SCHEDULED TRIBE
             DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,,
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
      3      THE CHIEF, TRIBAL RESETTLEMENT AND
             DEVELOPMENT MISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
      4      THE DIRECTOR, SCHEDULED TRIBE
             DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
      5      THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR.
      6      THE ADMINISTRATOR, ARALAM FARM
             ARALAM FARM P.O., PERAVOOR VIA, KANNUR.

                R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER

                SRI. ROBIN RAJ M.K., SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER

      THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
      07.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C) No. 9148/2010               : 2:




                   Dated this the 7th day of January, 2021.

                                    JUDGMENT

SHAJI P. CHALY, J.

This writ petition is filed as a Public Interest Litigation seeking

the following reliefs:

1. Call for the records pertaining to Ext. P4 and quash the same by issuing a writ of certiorari.

2. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents to provide entire Farm land in Aralam Farm to landless tribals in Kerala as agreed by the Government vide Ext.P1.

3. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents 1 and 2 to desist from transforming the Aralam Farm into a Private Limited Company namely Aralam Farm into a Private Limited Company namely Aralam Farming Corporation of Kerala Ltd.

2. What is sought for in the writ petition is quashment of Ext. P4

Memorandum of Association of Aralam Farming Corporation of Kerala

Limited having its registered office within the State of Kerala. From

Ext. P4, it is evident that the main objects of the company are (i) to

take over the assets and liabilities of the Aralam Farm, Kannur District,

Kerala State from the Government of Kerala in consonance with the

Government Orders and to develop the infrastructure and other

facilities, which may inter alia improve the standard of living of the

adivasis to be rehabilitated adjoining to this farm; (ii) to carry on the

business of setting up and running agricultural farms for the

production, primarily of seeds of food grains, fibre crops, plantation

crops, oil seeds, vegetables and fruits as well as undertaking studies of

these crops on such lands as may be acquired or transferred from

Government of Kerala or any other mode; (iii) to carry on the business

of poultry, sheep, pig and other cattle breeding farms, either as

independent unit or as part of agricultural farms as also the business

of keepers, breeders, importers, exporters and traders of poultry and

cattle of all kinds; (iv) to carry on the business of farmers, producers,

processors, exporters, packers and importers of agricultural produce of

all kind including garden and horticulture produce; and (v) to provide

all manner of support services to further the social and economic

welfare of the tribals resettled in Aralam. The apprehension voiced by

the petitioner is that if a company is formed by taking over the

property of the Aralam farm providing land to the landless adivasis

would be given a go-bye.

3. According to the petitioner, even though certain initial steps

were taken, the Government has not initiated further action to assign

the land to the landless tribals and if the land earmarked for the

adivasis from among the Aralam farm is allotted to the company, it

would seriously prejudice the adivasis. Various other contentions are

also raised.

4. In fact, interim orders were being passed by this Court to

ensure that the lands are distributed to the tribals of Kannur District.

Anyhow, when the matter was posted on 29.03.2010, submission was

made by the learned Special Government Pleader that substantial

portion of the property measuring 2335 acres has already been

distributed. Anyhow, since the area of land distributed to the tribals

was not furnished, a direction was issued accordingly. Subsequent

interim orders show that the Government was directed to take action

so as to distribute the land to the tribals without fail.

5. Anyhow, on 22.06.2010, an interim order was passed

directing the State Government to allot land to landless tribals from

the rest of the lands earmarked in Aralam farm within 3 months from

the date of receipt of the order. Evidently, time was sought to

implement the interim order passed by this Court by filing I.A. No.

16611 of 2012 and accordingly, 6 months' time was granted from

22.10.2012.

6. As per the order dated 03.01.2013, the State Government

has filed a detailed counter affidavit along with the documents,

wherein it is stated that an extent of 2,335 acres of land in Aralam

farm has been allotted to only tribals from the Kannur District. Later, it

came to the notice of the Government that 1220 tribals from Kannur

who were not totally landless and held nominal extent of land had also

been allotted land in Aralam farm.

7. The Government has also issued a direction in letter No.

830/D2/2009/SCSTDD dated 18.02.2009 to allot lands only to landless

tribals, and that in case where there were no more landless tribals in

Kannur, lands at Aralam were to be distributed to the landless tribals

from the neighbouring districts, which includes Wayanad, evident from

Ext.R2(b). Such aspects were reiterated in Ext.R2(c) communication

dated 24.02.2010. It is also stated that as per the data collected from

the Director, Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes Development

Department, there are 14213 landless tribals in the State, of which

Kannur District has 893. However, on further verification, it has been

reported from Kannur that there are only 308 landless tribals yet to

receive land in Kannur District. Therefore, according to the State

Government, in terms of the current orders, only 308 landless tribals

alone are to be provided with lands. But, fact remains, the said

affidavit filed by the Government was on 18.05.2010 and when the

matter was taken up today, the learned Government Pleader submitted

that land is allotted to all the landless tribals in Kannur District.

In view of the submissions made above, we are inclined to

dispose of the writ petition recording the same and also with adequate

directions. Therefore, after having heard the learned counsel for the

petitioner Sri Jojo A.V and the learned Special Government Pleader Sri.

Robinraj M. K, this writ petition is disposed of recording the aforesaid

submission and further directing that if any landless tribals are

identified from Kannur District, the said aspect shall be considered by

the State Government and take appropriate action to redress the

grievance also.

S. MANIKUMAR, CHIEF JUSTICE.

SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE.

Rv

APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(P) NO.41/2002/SC ST DD DATED 20.07.2002.

EXT.P1(a): TRUE COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.P1.

EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF G.O.(MS) NO.45/2006 SCST DD DATED 02.09.2006.

EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE LIST PREPARED BY THE TRIBAL RESETTLEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT MISSION.

EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION AND ARTICLE OF ASSOCIATION FORWARDED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT WITH A COVERING LETTER DATED 05.03.2010.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:

EXT.R2(a): TRUE COPY OF G.O.(MS) NO.45/2006/SCSTDD DATED 02.09.2006.

EXT.R2(b): TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO. 830/D2/2009/SCSTDD DATED 18.02.2009.

EXT.R2(c): TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(MS) NO.23/2010/SCSTDD DATED 24.02.2010.

/True Copy/

P.S to Judge.

rv

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter