Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Binu Mathew vs The Managing Director
2021 Latest Caselaw 3379 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3379 Ker
Judgement Date : 29 January, 2021

Kerala High Court
Binu Mathew vs The Managing Director on 29 January, 2021
RP.No.10 OF 2021
                                     1

            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

                 THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA

     FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 9TH MAGHA, 1942

                RP.No.10 OF 2021 IN WP(C). 11933/2020

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 11933/2020(N) OF HIGH COURT
                           OF KERALA


REVIEW PETITIONER/S:

                BINU MATHEW
                AGED 45 YEARS
                S/O. MATHEW VARGHESE, S.A HOMES JEWEL 3, TOWER 1-
                A2, KALLEPULLY, PALAKKAD-678 005.

                BY ADVS.
                SRI.JOMY GEORGE
                SRI.R.PADMARAJ
                SRI.DEEPAK MOHAN
                SMT. CHITRA N. DAS
                SHRI.RISHAB S.

RESPONDENT/S:

      1         THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
                KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALA BHAVAN, VELLAYAMBALAM,
                THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

      2         SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, P.H.CIRCLE, KERALA WATER
                AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD-678 001.

      3         EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
                WATER SUPPLY PROJECT DIVISION, KERALA WATER
                AUTHORITY, KALMANDAPAM, PALAKKAD-678 001.

                R1-3 BY SHRI.P.BENJAMIN PAUL, SC, KERALA WATER
                AUTHORITY

     THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION              ON
29.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 RP.No.10 OF 2021
                                    2




                                 ORDER

Dated this the 29th day of January 2021

The Review Petition is filed pointing out that the time

granted to the respondents is too large and petitioner is badly

in need of funds in order to complete the work.

2. As the work is ongoing, there shall be a direction to

the respondents to make the payment towards 25% of the amount

due to the petitioner within one month. The judgment is

therefore modified with a further direction to the respondents

to make 25% of the payment within one month.

The Review Petition is accordingly disposed of.

Sd/-

                                                 P.V.ASHA

rkc                                               JUDGE
 RP.No.10 OF 2021



                           APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

ANNEXURE A-1         TRUE   COPY   OF   THE   JUDGMENT    IN    WPC
                     NO.8842/2019   DATED   12.4.2019    OF    THIS
                     HON'BLE COURT.

ANNEXURE A2          TRUE COPY OF ANOTHER JUDGMENT IN WPC

NO.31939/2019 DATED 11.2.2020 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter