Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 158 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 January, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 15TH POUSHA, 1942
WP(C).No.27516 OF 2020(L)
PETITIONERS:
1 FATHIMA ABDUL AZEEZ (MINOR),
D/O. ABDUL AZEEZ, AMBALATHU VEETTIL
KAKKARAMBATH, PAVARARTTY P.O. PUTHUMANASSERY,
PAVARATTY VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR
DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY FATHER AND NATURAL
GUARDIAN, ABDUL AZEES, S/O. KUNJUMUHAMME,
AGED 52YEARS, AMBALATHU VETTIIL,
KAKKARAMBATH, PAVARATTY P.O. PUTHUMANASSERY,
PAVARATTY VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR
DISTRICT.
2 AMINA ABDUL AZEEZ (MINOR),
D/O.ABDUL AZEES, AGED 52YEARS, AMBALATHU
VETTIIL, KAKKARAMBATH, PAVARATTY P.O.
PUTHUMANASSERY, PAVARATTY VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD
TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.REPRESENTS BY FATHER
AND NATURAL GUARDIAN,
ABDUL AZEES, S/O. KUNJUMUHAMME, AGED 52YEARS,
AMBALATHU VETTIIL, KAKKARAMBATH, PAVARATTY
P.O. PUTHUMANASSERY, PAVARATTY VILLAGE,
CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
3 HALEEMA ABDUL AZEEZ (MINOR),
D/O.ABDUL AZEES, AGED 52YEARS, AMBALATHU
VETTIIL, KAKKARAMBATH, PAVARATTY P.O.
PUTHUMANASSERY, PAVARATTY VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD
TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.REPRESENTS BY FATHER
AND NATURAL GUARDIAN,
ABDUL AZEES, S/O. KUNJUMUHAMME, AGED 52YEARS,
AMBALATHU VETTIIL, KAKKARAMBATH, PAVARATTY
P.O. PUTHUMANASSERY, PAVARATTY VILLAGE,
CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ
W.P.(C)No.27516 of 2020 ..2..
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE DISTRICT GEOLOGIST,
DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY,
THRISSUR DISTRICT 680 001.
2 THE DIRECTOR,
MINING AND GEOLOGY, OFFICE OF THE MINING AND
GEOLOGY, KESAVADASAPURAM, PATTAM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.
3 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA
GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
695001.
4 STATE ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY
SEIAA, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND FOREST,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, 695 001, GOVERNMENT OF
KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY.
OTHER PRESENT:
GP. PAUL ABRAHAM VAKKANAL
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 05.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C)No.27516 of 2020 ..3..
Writ Petition (C) No.27516 of 2020
-----------------------------------------------
JUDGMENT
Petitioners propose to put up a building measuring
2952.24 square metres in a land owned by them within the limits of
Erumappetty Grama Panchayat. The said land needs to be
developed by removing ordinary earth for the purpose of putting up
the building proposed by them. The petitioners, therefore obtained
Ext.P3 development permit and Ext.P4 building permit for the said
purpose. Thereupon, the petitioners have applied for quarrying
permit to remove ordinary earth from the land. The application
preferred by the petitioners in this regard has been rejected by the
first respondent in terms of Ext.P6 communication. Ext.P6
communication is under challenge in the writ petition.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as
also the learned Government Pleader.
3. It is seen that in the light of the amendment
introduced to Rule 14 of the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules,
2015 and in terms of G.O.(P) No.16/2020, quarrying permit is not W.P.(C)No.27516 of 2020 ..4..
required for removing ordinary earth from the site where the
petitioners propose to put up the building. As per the rules now in
force, the petitioners need only obtain mineral transit passes in
accordance with the Kerala Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining,
Storage and Transportation) Rules, 2015 for the said purpose.
4. Insofar as the petitioners need not have to obtain
quarrying permit for the purpose of removing ordinary earth from
the site where they propose to put up the building, it is unnecessary
to examine the correctness of Ext.P6 order.
The writ petition, in the circumstances, is disposed of
permitting the petitioners to prefer application before the first
respondent for mineral transit passes in terms of the Kerala Minerals
(Prevention of Illegal Mining, Storage and Transportation) Rules,
2015. Needless to say that if the petitioners prefer application for
mineral transit passes, appropriate decision shall be taken by the
first respondent on the said application, within one month from the
date of receipt of the application.
Sd/-
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE
ds 05.01.2021
W.P.(C)No.27516 of 2020 ..5..
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED
28.5.2019 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE
OFFICER, NELLUVAYI VILLAGE.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION
CERTIFICATE DATED 22.5.2019 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, NELLUVAYI VILLAGE.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT DATED 4.5.2018 ISSUED BY ERUMAPETTY GRAMA PANCHAYATH.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT DATED 14.6.2018 ISSUED BY ERUMAPETTY GRAMA PANCHAYATH.
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE CERTIFICATE DATED 4.10.2019 ISSUED BY THE FOURTH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATIVE DATED 4.2.2020 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT DATED 14.9.2020 IN WPC NO. 11426/2020.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!