Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6712 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 February, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 6TH PHALGUNA, 1942
Crl.MC.No.8792 OF 2019(H)
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 632/2018 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
OF FIRST CLASS,TALIPARAMBA
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 12:
1 AJITH ALEN
AGED 22 YEARS
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING STUDENT, VIMAL JYOTHI
ENGINEERING COLLEGE, CHEMPERI, P.O.CHEMPERI, KANNUR
DISTRICT-670632.
2 ABY
AGED 22 YEARS
CIVIL ENGINEERING STUDENT, VIMAL JYOTHI ENGINEERING
COLLEGE, CHEMPERI, P.O.CHEMPERI, KANNUR DISTRICT-
670632.
3 JOYAL
AGED 22 YEARS
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING STUDENT, VIMAL JYOTHI
ENGINEERING COLLEGE, CHEMPERI, P.O.CHEMPERI, KANNUR
DISTRICT-670632.
4 THANISH
AGED 22 YEARS
CIVIL ENGINEERING STUDENT, VIMAL JYOTHI ENGINEERING
COLLEGE, CHEMPERI, P.O.CHEMPERI, KANNUR DISTRICT-
670632.
5 SAYOOJ
AGED 22 YEARS
CIVIL ENGINEERING STUDENT, VIMAL JYOTHI ENGINEERING
COLLEGE, CHEMPERI, P.O.CHEMPERI, KANNUR DISTRICT-
670632.
6 VINAY
AGED 22 YEARS
CIVIL APPLIED ELECTRONICS AND INSTRUMENTATION
ENGINEERING STUDENT, VIMAL JYOTHI ENGINEERING
COLLEGE, CHEMPERI, P.O.CHEMPERI, KANNUR DISTRICT-
670632.
CRL.M.C.NO.8792 OF 2019
2
7 SHYAM
AGED 22 YEARS
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING STUDENT, VIMAL JYOTHI
ENGINEERING COLLEGE, CHEMPERI, P.O.CHEMPERI, KANNUR
DISTRICT-670632.
8 ATHUL SAJI
AGED 22 YEARS
COMPUTER ENGINEERING STUDENT, VIMAL JYOTHI
ENGINEERING COLLEGE, CHEMPERI, P.O.CHEMPERI, KANNUR
DISTRICT-670632.
9 ANANTHU
AGED 22 YEARS
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING STUDENT, VIMAL JYOTHI
ENGINEERING COLLEGE, CHEMPERI, P.O.CHEMPERI, KANNUR
DISTRICT-670632.
10 RAHUL THEKKAN
AGED 22 YEARS
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING STUDENT, VIMAL JYOTHI
ENGINEERING COLLEGE, CHEMPERI, P.O.CHEMPERI, KANNUR
DISTRICT-670632.
11 BIBIN MATHEW
AGED 22 YEARS
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING STUDENT, VIMAL JYOTHI
ENGINEERING COLLEGE, CHEMPERI, P.O.CHEMPERI, KANNUR
DISTRICT-670632.
12 KIRAN
AGED 22 YEARS
ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING STUDENT, VIMAL JYOTHI
ENGINEERING COLLEGE, CHEMPERI, P.O.CHEMPERI, KANNUR
DISTRICT-670632.
BY ADV. SRI.V.A.SATHEESH
RESPONDENTS/STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:
1 STATE OF KERALA,
REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA
AT ERNAKULAM.
2 SANJAY WILSON,
S/O.O.S.WILSON, AGED 24 YEARS, OLAVAKKUNEELHOUSE,
PERAMBRA, CHANGAROTH AMSOM, AVADUKKA DESOM,
QUILANDY TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN-673014.
R2 BY ADV. V.T.MADHAVANUNNI
CRL.M.C.NO.8792 OF 2019
3
OTHER PRESENT:
PP T.R.RENJITH
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
25.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
CRL.M.C.NO.8792 OF 2019
4
ORDER
Dated this the 25th day of February 2021
Petitioners are the accused in C.C.No.632/2018
on the files of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court,
Taliparamba for offences punishable under Sections
143, 148, 341, 323, 324 & 294(b) read with Section
149 of IPC. The de facto complainant, at whose
instance the crime was registered, is arrayed as the
2nd respondent. The 2nd respondent has filed an
affidavit stating that the dispute, which was the
reason for the incident and registration of the crime,
has been resolved amicably and he has no subsisting
grievance against the petitioners.
2. Heard the learned Public Prosecutor also,
who, on instructions, submits that the petitioners
have no criminal antecedents.
3. Having considered the gravity of the offences
alleged, nature of the injury caused and having
perused the affidavit filed by the 2nd respondent, the CRL.M.C.NO.8792 OF 2019
contents of which are submitted to be true and
voluntary, I am satisfied that the dispute is settled
and no public interest is involved in this matter. That
the petitioners were students, when the incident
occurred is also taken into consideration. Moreover, in
view of the settlement, possibility of the criminal
proceedings ending in conviction is remote. As such,
continuance of the proceedings will amount to an
abuse of process of court and hence, in view of the
legal position set out by the Honourable Supreme
Court in Madan Mohan Abbot v. State of Punjab
[(2008) 4 SCC 582] and Gian Singh v. State of
Punjab and another [(2012) 10 SCC 303], there is
no impediment in granting the relief sought.
In the result, this Crl.M.C is allowed. Further
proceedings C.C.No.632/2018 on th files of Judicial
First Class Magistrate Court, Taliparamba is quashed.
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN
JUDGE
NB CRL.M.C.NO.8792 OF 2019
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE COMPLAINT IN C.C.NO.632/2018 ON THE FILE OF J.F.C.M. COURT, TALIPARAMBA.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL
TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!