Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6479 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 4TH PHALGUNA, 1942
Crl.MC.No.755 OF 2021(D)
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 527/2019 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
OF FIRST CLASS - I, KARUNAGAPPALLY
CRIME NO.4596/2017 OF Karunaagapally Police Station, Kollam
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 AND 2:
1 SRUTHI
AGED 31 YEARS
W/O. VIKAS THAMPURAN,
RESIDING AT PUNARTHAM VEEDU,
OOCHIRA, PAYIKUZHIMURI,
OOCHIRA, KOLLAM.
2 VIKAS THAMPURAN
S/O. THAMPURAN,
RESIDING AT PUNARTHAM VEEDU,
OOCHIRA, PAYIKUZHIMURI,
OOCHIRA, KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI. S. SREEKUMAR
RESPONDENTS/STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:
1 THE STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031.
2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
KARUNAGAPALLY POLICE STATION,
KOLLAM, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM 682 031.
3 K. P. SOBHANA,
AGED 52 YEARS, W/O. K. SADHASIVAN,
RESIDING AT KOYIKKAL THEKKATHIL,
PADYANAYARKULANGARA, KARUNAGAPALLY,
KOLLAM - 690 544.
R3 - G.P. ANILKUMAR
SRI. C. S. HRITHWIK, SR.PP.
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
23.02.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No.755 OF 2021
2
ORDER
Dated this the 23rd day of February 2021
Petitioners are the accused in Crime No.4596/2017
registered at the Karunagapally Police Station for offences
punishable under Sections 406, 416 and 420 read with Section
34 of IPC, now pending as C.C. No.527/2019 on the files of the
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Karunagapally. The de
facto complainant, at whose instance the crime was registered,
is arrayed as the 3rd respondent. Annexure - A3 affidavit has
been filed by the 3rd respondent stating that the dispute, which
was the reason for the incident and registration of the crime,
has been resolved amicably and she has no subsisting
grievance against the petitioners.
2. Heard the learned Public Prosecutor also, who, on
instructions, submits that the petitioners have no criminal
antecedents.
3. Having considered the gravity of the offences
alleged, nature of the injury caused and having perused the Crl.MC.No.755 OF 2021
affidavit filed by the 3rd respondent, the contents of which are
submitted to be true and voluntary, I am satisfied that the
dispute is settled and no public interest is involved in this
matter. Moreover, in view of the settlement, possibility of the
criminal proceedings ending in conviction is remote. As such,
continuance of the proceedings will amount to an abuse of
process of court and hence, in view of the legal position set out
by the Honourable Supreme Court in Madan Mohan Abbot v.
State of Punjab [(2008) 4 SCC 582] and Gian Singh v. State
of Punjab and another [(2012) 10 SCC 303], there is no
impediment in granting the relief sought.
In the result, this Crl.M.C is allowed. The proceedings in
C.C. No.527/2019 on the files of the Judicial First Class
Magistrate Court, Karunagapally is quashed.
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN JUDGE
SPR Crl.MC.No.755 OF 2021
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A1 A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.4596/2017 OF THE KARUNAGAPALLY DATED 27.12.2017.
ANNEXURE A2 A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE CHARGE ON THE FILE OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT- KARUNAGAPALLY IN CC NO.527/2019.
ANNEXURE A3 A AFFIDAVIT DATED 15TH JANUARY, 2021 HAS BEEN SWORN BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT BEFORE THIS HON'BLE COURT.
RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS: NIL.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!