Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Poojashajilal vs Rahul
2021 Latest Caselaw 6323 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6323 Ker
Judgement Date : 22 February, 2021

Kerala High Court
Poojashajilal vs Rahul on 22 February, 2021
OP (FC).No.772 OF 2019

                              1

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                           PRESENT

      THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

                              &

              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS

MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 3RD PHALGUNA, 1942

                    OP (FC).No.772 OF 2019

       AGAINST O.P36/2018 OF FAMILY COURT, CHAVARA


PETITIONER:

              POOJASHAJILAL,
              AGED 22 YEARS
              D/O.SINDHU, SREELAYAMVEEDU, MADATHILKARAZHMA
              MURI, OACHIRA.P.O., KARUNAGAPPALLY.

              BY ADV. SRI.M.R.SASITH

RESPONDENT:

              RAHUL
              S/O.RAJENDRAN, AMMATTOOR VADAKKATHIL,
              MADATHILKARAZHMA, OACHIRA.P.O.,
              KARUNAGAPPALLY.


     THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
22-02-2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
 OP (FC).No.772 OF 2019

                            2

                         JUDGMENT

Dated this the 22nd day of February 2021

C.S.Dias, J.

The petitioner in this original petition had filed

O.P (HMA) No.36/2018 (Ext.P1) before the Family

Court, Chavara, seeking to declare her marriage with

the respondent as null and void.

2. The facts in a nut-shell in this original

petition is that while the petitioner was cross-

examined as PW1, certain photographs and a video

CD were shown to her, purportedly taken at the time

of marriage. She deposed that the video was taken

without her permission and, therefore, she could not

admit its contents.

3. In the meantime, the petitioner approached

this Court and filed O.P (FC)No.118/2019. This Court

by Ext.P2 judgment dated 6.3.2019 directed the

Family Court to dispose of Ext.P1 within a time frame. OP (FC).No.772 OF 2019

Thereafter, the respondent filed I.A No.1970/2019

(Ext.P3) to send the video CD to C-Dit,

Thiruvananthapuram, to prove its authenticity. The

petitioner filed Ext.P5 written objection to Ext.P3

application. The Family Court by Ext. P4 order

allowed the application and directed the CD to be

sent for expert opinion to C-Dit.

4. It is aggrieved by Ext.P4 order that this

Original Petition is filed.

5. This Original Petition was filed as early as

on 5.12.2019. This Court declined to stay further

proceedings in Ext.P1.

6. When this original petition came up for

consideration on 17.2.2021, this Court had called for

telephonic instructions from the Family Court, to

ascertain the present status of O.P. 36/2018. It has

been informed that Ext.P1 is posted for the report

from the C-Dit, Thiruvananthapuram and Ext.P1 is

posted to 24.2.2021. Taking note of the fact that, this OP (FC).No.772 OF 2019

Court had declined to stay all further proceedings in

Ext.P1 and the Family Court had forwarded the

disputed video CD to the C-Dit, pursuant to Ext.P4,

and now that the case is posted for the report from C-

Dit, Thiruvananthapuram, we do not find any reason

to interfere with Ext.P4 at this distance of time.

Moreover, on an appreciation of the pleadings,

materials on record and the findings of the Family

Court in Ext.P4 order, we do not find any error of

jurisdiction or illegality in the impugned Ext.P4 order

warranting interference by this Court in exercise of its

supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the

Constitution of India.

7. Taking note of the fact that this Court had by

Ext.P2 judgment directed the Family Court to consider

and dispose of Ext.P1 within a period of six months

from 6.3.2019,we direct the Family Court to dispose of

the case as expeditiously as possible on the receipt of

the report from C-Dit,Thiruvananthapuram. It is also OP (FC).No.772 OF 2019

brought to the notice of this Court that the learned

Judge of the Family Court has till date not sought for

any enlargement of time pursuant to the directions in

Ext.P2. It is upto the Family Court to seek for

enlargement of time to dispose Ext.P1.

With the above observations, this original petition

is disposed of.

Sd/-

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

JUDGE

Sd/-

                                    C.S.DIAS
ma/23.2.2021    /True copy/
                                     JUDGE
 OP (FC).No.772 OF 2019




                         APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1         TRUE COPY OF THE OP HMA NO.36/2019

FILED BY THE PETITIONER AGAINST THE RESPONDENT BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT AT CHAVARA

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN OP(FC)NO.118/2019

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE IA NO.1970/2019 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT BEFORE THE HON'BLE FAMILY COURT AT CHAVARA DATED 11.10.2019

EXHIBIT P4 RUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED IN I.A..1970/2019 IN O.P.36/2018 DATED 12.11.2019

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER

EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE IA NO.2278/2019 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT SEEKING FURTHER TIME FOR SENDING THE VIDEO DATED 20.11.2019

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter